Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH Security Advisor Shoots Down Babbling Chris Wallace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 02:28 PM
Original message
WH Security Advisor Shoots Down Babbling Chris Wallace
 
Run time: 01:03
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7DZ_f_77us
 
Posted on YouTube: May 08, 2011
By YouTube Member: jackohoft
Views on YouTube: 306
 
Posted on DU: May 08, 2011
By DU Member: Grassy Knoll
Views on DU: 2593
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dencol Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Could have done much better.
OBL posed a direct threat as an armed man in a "battle." Those we interrogate are unarmed and pose no threat to us; that's why we cannot use force as a civilized society. This is so obvious, but the security advisor couldn't even articulate this fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Fully agree
There is a difference between offing a guy in a military operation vs. torturing a handcuffed prisoner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I thought he did fine. it was a barrage of stupid, question statements
some of which were not based on facts at all. The guys at Fox have a tough job these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yeah. It was a pretty weak answer. But he did answer it. It's because one has been captured
and poses no threat at the time, and interrogation techniques are for the purpose of getting information, not doling out justice. OBL was killed as part of a military action, and the main purposes were to dole out justice, get rid of a mass murderer as expeditiously as possible, WHILE ENSURING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE THAT THE SEALS DIDN'T GET HURT OR KILLED, and were able to get out asap.

Two totally different scenarios for different purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Typical dishonest banter from a media figure ....
Chris Wallace was using a false analogy ... it was completely fallacious ....

I could explain the difference, but I dont have to .... Suffice to say 'Chris Wallace ? .... FUCK YOU !'


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Notice how Wallace twisted his words to "Against our values to get info from KSM:"
No Chris-tool, against our value to torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Torture elicits
bad information that wastes resources. If the interrogator is seeking a desired answer torture works. If valuable information is needed torture is not a good technique. Republicans are still trying to justify Bush cartel war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnie Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. There is a huge difference in torturning a captive
who is defenseless, and who is being repeatedly treated in a manner to create suffering in a non combat setting,and firing on an enemy in a military confrontation when the individual(s) being fired on could reasonably be expected to be combatants and be armed and capable of firing back.

Generally POW's are not combatants, they cannot possibly be armed, they have been rendered virtually harmless. POW's are not repeatedly shot just to make them suffer, that would indeed be torture.

Wallace's question was vastly ignorant and the response missed the oportunity to show Wallace up as a total ignoramus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Too timid. Too apologetic about torture.
Edited on Sun May-08-11 10:14 PM by JDPriestly
Torture of a prisoner is quite different from killing a person during a military action in a location that is only momentarily under your control and in which hostile parties might attack entering troops.

A person who is tortured is completely under your control. Torture is unnecessary in order to subdue or control the person. It is therefore an abuse of power -- a bully technique.

When you send a team of Seals into a country without the open approval and perhaps even without the acquiescence of the government of that country, and

when, on top of that, the location that the Seals are entering is a few blocks from a major military installation in that country, you do not have control.

Your target is not subdued. Killing the person you are seeking is to be expected if there is strong evidence to suggest that the person might respond violently. In this case, killing the person is a military action, not an abuse of power or a bully technique.

Fox News does not plug the brightest bulbs into its shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very_Boring_Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. That was dissapointingly weak
The correct response would have been that OBL was a direct threat to the SEALS at the time. Captive prisoners are threats to nobody (except perhaps themselves).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC