Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ITS A GO!!!! WE HAVE THE VOTES!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 08:09 AM
Original message
ITS A GO!!!! WE HAVE THE VOTES!!
babylonsister sister just posted it in GDP.. It is 8:08 CST.. and we have the votes for HCR!

Over 100 years in the making, and we did it!..

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's about time and
Republicans are still crying foul because this wasn't done out in the open and that they were not included after almost a year of debate, two bills already passed and now more open debate, amendments (from both sides) and soon passage of a series of reconciliation bills.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Out in the open, like their reasons for war?
Out in the open like all the information pointing to Iraq not having weapons of mass destruction? That kind of Republican openness? Their hypocrisy in attempting to prevent one dime of tax money, what they consider their war for oil and weapons makers funds, going to help the people of this country is so sickening that if we actually had a functional press it would disgust people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not going to breathe a sigh of relief until the vote is done.
Counting chickens and all that...

*nervous*
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's what I thought, too! Now, they're saying, we're at 214. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Conflicting sources ...

The source of 216 is John Larson, the Democratic caucus chairman. I tend to believe he is probably in the best position to know at this point.

The other sources are Stupak, who wants things, and someone else I can't remember at the moment.

Also, don't forget that the networks have their own interest in keeping the drama high.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Wow..just wow. They're always too prediCtible,
aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Quite ...

...and the latest, apparently Stupak is going to vote "Yes," so I guess he got what he wanted ... probably the executive order language he was looking for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thanks, we'll see..
And, I don't see how it could affect the reallity of the Bill any differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. It won't ...

It's just something Stupak will be able to take to his district during election time ... or his priest, whichever.

Any executive order he gets will be nothing more than a redundancy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Well, as much as I didn't like
stupak and his idiocy..if he's a YES than he's better than my blue dog who didn't even try..he just cowered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Just got up, looking for news
I should have known to come here first.

Thanks!

I turned on C-Span and Virginia Foxx was blathering about how terrible Democrats were to pass a bill that they admitted was awful. How does one get to be so hatefully stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Virginia Foxx - I have never seen such a vile woman.
Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. And why did cspan have such a
vile person on? Was there any balance to a person like her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Covering Rules Committee
I think it was a replay of something yesterday. Just not pleasant when you haven't even had your first cup yet.

Then they went to call-ins, god it's scary to think these stupid fuckers drive on the same roads I do. Especially the ones who don't want reform because it might mess up their Medicare or Medicaid. :crazy:

I just heard Stupak is a yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Stupak a YES?!
Oh my GOSH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's what this reporter on CSpan said
It was just a couple of comments and then on they went. House in session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Rules committee
I watched part of a repeat of that last night. UGH. The 4 GOP kept reading their ammendments and calling for a vote. When they lost the voice vote they called for an individual vote. This went on and on and on and on.

They were repeatedly told that they could NOT put ammendments in the Senate bill because then it would have to go back to the Senate and be filibustered. Didn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. I came here looking for news
just like this, Peacetrain! Thank you. A Real Squeaker!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC