How long would Bush last if someone launched an "Arkansas Project" aimed at him?
ck4829
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 07:02 PM
Original message
How long would Bush last if someone launched an "Arkansas Project" aimed at him?
The Arkansas Project was a project to dig up information on Bill Clinton and publish it in an attempt to make him look bad? How long would Bush last if several people decided to get together and form a "Texas Project" aimed at making him look bad?
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. We are at a disadvantage, unlike the Arkansas project, we
deadmessengers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We also don't have Scaife's money
It helps a bit - private eyes are expensive.
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What the PI's didn't find, the Arkansas Project made up.
Read David Brock's book "Blinded by the Right."
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Congress should operate as an "Arkansas Project" for his
crimes in office. We need a Truth Commission for the next Republic junk yard dog they unleash on the public.
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Arkansas Project operated with the full cooperation of the media
Not to mention the Office of Independent Counsel and a sexual pervert named Ken Starr who fed twice daily "leaks" to GOP operatives and the press. I doubt whether Democrats would have that kind of organizing power.
sam sarrha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
Edweird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think we should finish what's on our plate before going back for seconds.
These guys have admitted everything and done so in a public way. There really isn't a need to dig stuff up. Not that I am opposed, but good lord, isn't there enough already?
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not necessary. He "looks bad" right out there in front of everyone, everyday.
And as long as the media refuse to report on his royal nakedness, it makes very little difference.
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. We told the press. They ignored us. They lied to us.
They continued to play Bush as just your best buddy ever and deliberately used phrasing and camera angles that made our people look like crap. We had Funeralgate. We had his AWOL status. We had the way he used eminent domain to make himself rich. The press ignored everything.
Oeditpus Rex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Sat Jun-02-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
I'm convinced that W could masturbate in the rose garden during a live press conference and skate. America is that complacent.
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Sun May 05th 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.