Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT editorial: PROTECT OUR TROOPS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:12 PM
Original message
NYT editorial: PROTECT OUR TROOPS!
A Failure to Protect Our Troops
Published: June 14, 2007

The Bush administration and military leaders in Washington are always claiming that they will do anything to support American troops fighting in Iraq. That makes it all the more infuriating to learn that, for more than two years, the Pentagon largely ignored urgent requests from field commanders for better armor-protected vehicles that could have saved untold lives and limbs.

Improvised explosive devices, or I.E.D.’s, can blast through the flat underbelly of the military’s standard Humvees, maiming and killing the soldiers within. These devices, a low-tech response to America’s overwhelming military power, are now causing 70 percent to 80 percent of the American combat deaths in Iraq.

More than two years ago, according to newly disclosed documents, Marine commanders in Al Anbar Province, a center of the Sunni insurgency, submitted an urgent request for more than 1,100 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles, or MRAPs, that have V-shaped bottoms able to deflect blasts from below. For reasons yet to be satisfactorily explained, military officials initially sat on the request and then ordered relatively few....

Only now are Pentagon leaders, prodded by Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. and other critics on Capitol Hill, rushing to ramp up production....If the small companies that make these vehicles are not able to produce the quantities needed quickly, President Bush and Secretary Gates ought to make this a crash program and enlist major manufacturers.

There can be no excuse for failing to provide the best possible protection for American troops in this disastrous war.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/14/opinion/14thu1.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. But... but... but... the private mercenary contractors always need ...
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 03:25 PM by Amonester
mo' money (so they can run away from the IRS with it scot-free)...

And, BTW, didn't the NYT support that disastrous war?

Libby's & his "Aspens" (Miller&Co)' LIES? :grr:

Well, better late than never, but sheesh...



On edit: "LIES?" added.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. One of these days, I'm going to look up the editorials -- but I don't think that page...
which is separate from the news pages, cheered the run-up to the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Point taken.
If that page didn't cheer the run-up to the oil war-crime, I will apologize.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. It begs the question..WHY
would the bushits send our Soldiers into battle unprotected? Don't they have enough funds in the Pentagon cash drawer to protect our troops when they send them to a foreign country, that's loaded with oil, to bomb them and install their presence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Indeed, we've spent billions on SOMETHING. Exactly, what, I wonder. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Exactly!! Why can't Ford and Chrysler help out??
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 04:47 PM by Breeze54
"They ought to make this a crash program and enlist major manufacturers"

Yes they should!!! We have the factories and laid off auto workers,

so why aren't they enlisting their help??

:kick: & R'd!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That is a great idea. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC