Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Someone Ask Oh Gawd What Next? - Firm Sues Chinese Co. For Metal Shavings In Aspartame

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:42 PM
Original message
Did Someone Ask Oh Gawd What Next? - Firm Sues Chinese Co. For Metal Shavings In Aspartame
Firm Sues Chinese Co. For Shavings In Aspartame

Aug 18, 2007 7:01 am US/Central

(STNG) CHICAGO Libertyville-based DMH Ingredients has filed a federal lawsuit against Changzhou Kelong Chemical Co. Ltd., saying DMH found metal shavings in 11,200 kilos of aspartame artificial sweetener the Chinese company shipped in 2005.

DMH seeks more than $174,000 from the Chinese company to cover costs DMH had to pay Wisconsin-based Sturm Foods, where the metal shavings were discovered, the suit says.

http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/local_story_230080400.html


*** - Okay here's the plan. We don't eat, drink, sleep, wear any clothes or take any medicines. Oh, and no brushing of teeth either. Then we should be safe. We'll be sick and dying, exposing those tires around our middles and we'll smell really, really bad. But we'll be safe....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow....it just doesn't stop does it....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not yet....
...and when Marvin sang the song that said, "everyday there's something new," I'm sure he had no idea that he was talking about our future foreign trade policy....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Free market kills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. This is beyond "FREE".....
...this is reckless abandon. And TOTAL GREED.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. That would make a good bumper sticker wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Freeper heads explode as their theories on unregulated
capitalism and regulated "frivolous lawsuits" fall apart. Look at China, they're not regulated (obviously)

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. A Boolean search....
...for the word "China" would produce "0 hits" on the Freeper site, right now I'm sure....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. It's cheaper to make a dangerous product and cover it up...
than make a safe one in the first place.

So much easier. Lawsuits take years to resolve, but you can settle with a giant airtight non-disclosure agreement and a few-thousand-dollars-a-plaintiff payout.

Or intimdation works, or the occasional unfortunate accident involving a cement truck. That kind of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Like the infamous Pinto case, where Ford decided it was cheaper
to pay out the damages rather than redesign the vehicle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Right. An extra plate welded on to prevent the fires would have cost like $4 more
But....


And also, they defend themselves vigorously even when wrong just to discourage lawsuits in the future. Give up NOTHING without a fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why are You Bitchin' about Getting Iron-Fortified Nutrasweet for the Price of Regular?
Americans just can't be satisfied!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Oh, I see: That's not a bug, that's a feature! LOL. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Well call me picky....
...if you want to, but I prefer that when taking my iron supplement that I not have to follow it up with a trip to my oral surgeon.

Hey, I'm funny that way....

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. That was me, over at the post about formaldehyde in children's clothes and toys.
I have a two and a half year old grandson... This is just nuts.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Ohhhh....
...now I remember. I was you Hekate. You don't use this stuff do you?

I stopped using it years ago when I found out that it was invented on Donald Rumsfeld's watch at Seale in Chicago (I believe it was Searle if memory serves). It was originally being tested as an "anti-ulcer" drug. It was banned for 16 years by the FDA (before it became totally corrupted). I figured it out even back in the 70s that if Rumsfled had anything to do with it, it couldn't be any good. I remembered who he worked for (Nixon).

DeSwiss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Are they sure it wasn't aspartame
in their iron shavings?

I can't figure out which is worse for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Well.....
...you'd be taking your chances eating iron shavings, no doubt. On the otherhand, they've known that aspertame causes cancer almost from the start when it was invented. I'd take my chances with the shavings....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Frivolous lawsuits! Shyster lawyers! Anti-competitive!!!111

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. How long has China been producing poison products?
I wonder if they sell this crap to their own people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Poppy has been kneedeep in the Chinese economy since the 70's
Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Considering their air and water quality...
they probably don't notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. I'm sure its probably worse for the Chinese....
...at least if they're eating and wearing the stuff they make for the US. Plus all that toxic crap ends up in their water systems and soil.

On another note, many people are probably not aware that most of the vintage electronics that we throw away -- things like that old 286 or 386 PC, printers, televisions, and every other type of electronic devise imaginable -- many of them find there way onto barges and are shipped to China, India and other poor Southeast Asian countries where people bid on lots so that they can tear them apart for precious metals and other substances that are then resold to electronics makers.

The simplest way to get at these metals is burning. And of course the smoke is highly carcinogenic. And the people stand at their fires protecting them and separating the metals, exposing themselves and their children. And, in the absence of federal laws, there are only a few U.S. communities that mandate the proper disposal and recycling of this crap in the country right now....

Discarded computers, televisions, radios, batteries, cell phones, cameras and other gadgets contain a stew of toxic metals and chemicals such as lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium, brominated flame retardants and polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says American consumers generated nearly 2 million tons of electronic waste in 2005. Gartner estimates that 133,000 PCs are discarded by U.S. homes and businesses each day.

Only 10 to 15 percent of electronics are currently recycled, industry analysts say. The rest collects dust in people's homes or gets dumped into municipal landfills, where environmentalists worry toxic chemicals can leak out.

Among the e-waste that is recycled, activists say, up to 80 percent is exported overseas to dismantling shops where poor workers are exposed to hazardous fumes and chemicals while trying to extract valuable metals and components.

Researchers for Greenpeace International have detected high levels of toxic metals in soil and water samples collected around electronics-dismantling workshops in China and India.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/tech/20070303-1101-recyclingcomputers.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Yeah!!!
Who the hell are these people who want to live and not get sick? Selfish assholes the lot of em'.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. Recommended.
People need to be warned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. the manufactures involved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yeah, here's the thing, you'll actually have to hold your breath, too:

China is finding its many coal-burning power plants hard at work generating the much needed electricity power – as well as huge amounts of air pollutants like sulfur dioxide and mercury. The earth's climate system, however, does not recognize national borders, and that is how increased quantities of Chinese pollutants have joined, what the authors in this article call, a global "conveyor belt of bad air."

http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=5058
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. Read the labels...nothing from China
A can of fruit or vegetables will say packed by so and so but imported from China. They all have that on the can. And when you buy something that doesnt list where the ingredients came from...ask ask ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC