Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Doesn't anyone get it? We invaded Iraq which had nothing to do with 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 10:57 AM
Original message
Doesn't anyone get it? We invaded Iraq which had nothing to do with 9/11
nor did not have WMDs, or even present an immeninent threat to us

Yet they pound the drums how this is part of the war on terror, how fighting over there presents them from coming over here

No one, ESPECIALLY the Democrats seem to hit this point, THAT WE INVADED A COUNTRY FOR PURELY TAKING OVER THE RESOURCES OF A COUNTRY.

Does anyone even comprehend the immorality of that?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. shhh. We're 'spreading freedom' (tm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kucinich hits that point.
Why do people here keep ignoring him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Yes he does, and people here do not ignore him. The party does though
The reality is that he doesn't get the coverage, he is thought of as out of the norm, and has no chance, or much support

I would like to also remind you that during the Viet Nam war, those few people in Congress that were against THAT war were also thought of as out of the norm. In both cases, not only were they ahead of their time, they were right


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Well it's just that you said this...
"No one, ESPECIALLY the Democrats seem to hit this point"

So... that's why I felt it necessary to point out that actually that's not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I was referring to the Democratic leadership. You are right I didn't make it clear /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. If only he got the nomination...
I wonder how many people who have written off politics as pointless might have a change of heart if an honest candidate got through the whore media's filter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. In the primaries I will either vote for Edwards or Kucinich, haven't decided
Obviously, in the general election I will vote straight Democratic, if for nothing else than the Supreme Court


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
51. Yup... I'll hold my nose and do the same.
I just wish everyone who recognizes Kucinich's integrity and courage would vote for him in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
52. you know I wish he would buy some time on MSNBC to
respond to *'s speech, Edwards did. It would be great to hear both of their perspectives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Yup... sadly many Dems are going with an 'electable' candidate
and donating their money accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did you see Britney in her underwear the other night?...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. ... and do you think Larry Birkhead and Howard K. Sterne really DID it
... and what about that British couple ... did they really have something to do with Madeline's death?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
48. Hey! Don't you dare mock Britney!
Edited on Thu Sep-13-07 12:31 PM by smoogatz
She's a beautiful soul who grew up in a trailer park or something in the south, I think, and went on to lip-synch several pop classics, the names of which I've forgotten right now! And don't you dare say she was fat, because that's an insult to fat people everywhere, and don't say she looked stoned because that's insulting stoned people! Candle in the wind! Candle in the wind!!!!

Oh, wait. She's not dead. That wet, heavy thudding sound was just her career keeling over.

Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. You are preaching to the choir here. We all get it at DU.
It's the dummies that think Iraq had something to do with 9/11 who don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. I was expressing my frustration with the general public, not those at DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Which just hit you, the realization or the frustration that follows it? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. What triggered me was a poll I saw on Raw Story
http://rawstory.com//news/2007/No_surge_but_US_war_dissatisfaction_0913.html

It indicates that if Americans are affected by the selling of this war after 5 years, they still believe the original lies that motivated the invasion in the first place



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. The corporate media keeps selling those lies.
I'm not sure if it's because they don't want to admit they were wrong and complicit or if they are simply on the payroll of the propaganda machine (or both). But I can't think of an airport that doesn't have a TV playing CNN or Fox "news," continually seeding disinformation in the minds of every passerby.

But, yeah, it's scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
54. very scary, these propagandists for the * regime should be
called out for lying to the public, but they have gotten away with it for so long, they continue to dumb down Americans, really sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. I almost feel sorry for them.
Do you know how pissed all of these people are going to be once they find out, and they will eventually, that they've been made into suckers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. but they will never admit it how blind they are.
really sad, unfortunate to be so narrow minded huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. They'll just say they've been conned by people they trusted, which is consistent with their...
...version of reality (intelligent, strong, God-fearing leaders or whatever). And I don't care if the suckers admit it to me or not, as long as they turn their fury on those responsible for "duping" them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Unfortunately, 29%
still represents about 100 million idiots. Sad isnt it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. It's quite hard to believe after everything that has happened the last 7 years
It implies that we could invade another country, with the same lies, and people would fall in lock and step



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
55. yup, and the media will have another shock and awe spin
just disgusting, this pre emptive shit must end now. Yea, let's have a Dept. of Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
56. I suppose they are
those animal/man hybrids that santorum warned us about.....................called SHEEPLE.:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, you're partly right...
Edited on Thu Sep-13-07 11:02 AM by HereSince1628
but we REALLY invaded that country because it gave us a place that would help Bush control the WORLD.

Iraq is a nearly perfect location from which to project power that insures 'strategic influence' on access to oil not only from Iraq, but also from Africa, Russia, all of southwest Asia and Indonesia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. That is the illusion they have. How can you occupy another country?
The same critisim that we were throwing at Russia during the cold war, is hard to distinguish with what we are doing in Iraq


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. C.O.L.O.N.I.A.L.I.S.M., that's how.
It is what empires do. When the NeoConservative path to Global Hegemony was adopted as the Cheney administration's agenda all of this became inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. One would think we would have outgrown that? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. Wishful thinking. As long as greedy people like Dick Cheney hold the reins of power
exploitation of others will be part of the human condition.

For those who see $$ as the goal of government rather than betterment of humanity it's a no-brainer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. Actually our continued growth requires that we reach further and further
That means more Iraq's in the future. Different topic, but also more environemtnal destruction in the future. Which would cause more Iraq's, so now that I think about it, it's not a different topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
willoughby Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #24
36. Cold War Mentality
That is true! Trying to fight the "War on Terror" in the same manner that we fought the Cold War is a square peg in a round hole philosophy. The Bush administration misled the country into believing there was a connection or at least a threat towars us by Iraq. On the subject of being lied to by the government check out this link thats going around. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1Usd9HBuWg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
59. well we should all know by now, Cheney and Bush are OIL businessmen
anyway, and don't really care about anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good point, but all here know it to be true.
Why not send it to your local newspapers as a LTTE? You might reach some people who need to think about the truth of what you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. And with all that. Some people think the Democrats should distance themselves from MoveOn.org.
You know. Because apparently calling a General a name is worse than starting an illegal, lie-based war, and then lying about progress so you can stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. I remember when Westmorland said that the light was at the end of the tunnel
That was midway through the Viet Nam war. We lost 30000 more American lives after that, and over a million people were killed because of that war


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kucinich recognizes the immorality of that, yes.
Edited on Thu Sep-13-07 11:05 AM by redqueen
Are there any other candidates or politicians who admit it was a war for oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. There's a reason people believe this
When Robert Byrd commented that it was no coincidence that the Petraeus hearing was held on 9/11/2007 and asked Petraeus if Iraq had anything to do with 9/11, Petraeus replied, "Not to my knowledge." I could live with that.

But the very next Senator to question the general was Imhofe (R) and he emphatically stated that Iraq had terrorist training bases before 9/11 and even trained terrorists how to hijack jetliners. So the GOP managed to allow the general to avoid the lie but still got the lie on national radio/television so the lie could be perpetuated. Imhofe wasn't under oath so he, like most Republicans, had no qualms about spreading a bald face lie and keeping a straight face while doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. That is another point that bothers me. Why wasn't Petraeus under oath?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
58. that is another thing, why did they throw out McGovern when
he mentioned it too, what a bunch of liars, our troops are getting murdered by our thugs in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. I believe that you are preaching to the choir here. I would say
close to 100% of DU members are fully aware of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. I get it. I've said so too many times to count. Here. On DU.
The pre-emptive invasion of Iraq, for whatever reason, including the fact that it might have had WMD, was illegal. It was illegal under the rules of international law that the US itself helped to write. It was the act of an amoral and corrupt régime. Under those rules, enhanced interrogation is illegal. Under those rules, the targetting of civilian infrastructure is illegal. Under those rules, bombing Pakistan is illegal.

Under those rules, the Iraqi 'insurgents' are freedom fighters, and there is no such thing as an 'unlawful combatant.' The damage done to that country, including the pollution of soil and water and the litter of unexploded ordnance is criminal.

Among other things, the US owes reparations for those acts. However, it owes for more than that, and some of it cannot be fixed. For instance, the US base and the concomittant damage done to the excavations at the ancient city of Babylon are simply beyond repair.

But none of those things are brought up anywhere in the North American media, and I'd like to know why? I'd like to know why even your congresspersons avoid the entire topic of illegality? Why isn't torture on the top of the list?


Our media avoids the topic too, along with DU, and I'd like to know why that is as well.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
20. Bush said the terrorists were a bunch of confused kids who got tricked into hijacking planes.
I guess they need to be offered therapy and understanding, then?

They're a bunch of folks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
23. People like to drive to the mall
That's an overpowering obstacle to the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
25. I thought Barack Obama pointed that out during the Pateaus hearing???
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Yes in the last couple of days, he definitely has come out much stronger
Edited on Thu Sep-13-07 11:28 AM by still_one
and unequivocally

In my view ALL of the leading candidates were too quiet on this. Perhaps that is changing. Hopefully

I do sense that Democratic leaders in Congress are slowly getting the message, but we will see very shortly





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
willoughby Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Iraq and 911
Not only didn't Iraq have anything to do with 9-11, we've never had a discussion in this country as to the actual reasons why we were attacked in the first place! At least 50 years of short sighted American foreign policy in the Middle East. On the subject of being lied to by the government check out this link thats going around. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1Usd9HBuWg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. The Hamilton/Baker report said we must engage with all parties
in the region. The administration has rejected that report

Incidently, welcome to DU, glad to have you aboard



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. Welcome to DU and they hate us for our freedom!
:hi:

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
31. America wouldn't exist without that immorality
It couldn't exist without it. No increasingly complex state could, anywhere, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. If that is a justification of our invasion of Iraq, it is a weak argument at best
Yes, the U.S. was formed from our European past, and manifest destiny. That in no way justifies the invasion of Iraq

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. I'm not justifying it
I'm saying that's why we did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #42
68. That is the reason that the administration did it
most Americans had nothing to do with that decision


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
37. I'll guaran-damn-tee you
that I got it years ago!

I've never validated this exercise by calling it a war. I have always been very vocal about calling this an illegal invasion and occupation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
40. I did then and I do now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
41. "You can fool some of the people all of the time..."
'nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
44. That and human beings are being tortured and kept alive, against their will, for MORE TORTURE. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
46. even the Dems say they are too busy to deal with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
47. Where I am really hearing this lie
perpetuated is by the Rethug Presidential candidates especially by, Romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
49. Gore gets it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
50. I got it. I said it right before we invaded Iraq and people looked at me like I had truly
Edited on Thu Sep-13-07 12:33 PM by electron_blue
lost my mind.

eta: this is only going to get worse as resources dwindle. We as a nation need to decide what we are willing to do in the name of maintaining our standard of living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
61. Most people "have it". Unfortunately, "most people" aren't in
charge. And I, along with "most people" don't know how to change this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
62. In an unbiased court of law, Bush and his henchmen would
be convicted of treason and dealt with in the lawful manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
63. Well, if "Money Talks, Morals Walk" is true, we're talking $30 trillion of talking....
$30 trillion is the conservatively estimated profit on the 300 to 400 billion barrels of oil.

$30 trillion is a number few can wrap their heads around.

$30 trillion = 30,000 billion dollars.....

$30 trillion = 30 million million dollars.....

$30 trillion = giving $100,000 to every man, woman and child in the US

That's a WHOLE LOT of walking morals....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. The trouble is........
That it's not an American resource. None of it is. And taking all the money out of Iraq may be a neo-cons wet dream, but it's damn well going to ensure that the Iraqis starve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. Well, as Dylan said "money doesn't talk, it swears"...
Darkness at the break of noon
Shadows even the silver spoon
The handmade blade, the child's balloon
Eclipses both the sun and moon
To understand you know too soon
There is no sense in trying.

Pointed threats, they bluff with scorn
Suicide remarks are torn
From the fool's gold mouthpiece
The hollow horn plays wasted words
Proves to warn
That he not busy being born
Is busy dying.

Temptation's page flies out the door
You follow, find yourself at war
Watch waterfalls of pity roar
You feel to moan but unlike before
You discover
That you'd just be
One more person crying.

So don't fear if you hear
A foreign sound to your ear
It's alright, Ma, I'm only sighing.

As some warn victory, some downfall
Private reasons great or small
Can be seen in the eyes of those that call
To make all that should be killed to crawl
While others say don't hate nothing at all
Except hatred.

Disillusioned words like bullets bark
As human gods aim for their mark
Made everything from toy guns that spark
To flesh-colored Christs that glow in the dark
It's easy to see without looking too far
That not much
Is really sacred.

While preachers preach of evil fates
Teachers teach that knowledge waits
Can lead to hundred-dollar plates
Goodness hides behind its gates
But even the president of the United States
Sometimes must have
To stand naked.

An' though the rules of the road have been lodged
It's only people's games that you got to dodge
And it's alright, Ma, I can make it.

Advertising signs that con you
Into thinking you're the one
That can do what's never been done
That can win what's never been won
Meantime life outside goes on
All around you.

You lose yourself, you reappear
You suddenly find you got nothing to fear
Alone you stand with nobody near
When a trembling distant voice, unclear
Startles your sleeping ears to hear
That somebody thinks
They really found you.

A question in your nerves is lit
Yet you know there is no answer fit to satisfy
Insure you not to quit
To keep it in your mind and not fergit
That it is not he or she or them or it
That you belong to.

Although the masters make the rules
For the wise men and the fools
I got nothing, Ma, to live up to.

For them that must obey authority
That they do not respect in any degree
Who despise their jobs, their destinies
Speak jealously of them that are free
Cultivate their flowers to be
Nothing more than something
They invest in.

While some on principles baptized
To strict party platform ties
Social clubs in drag disguise
Outsiders they can freely criticize
Tell nothing except who to idolize
And then say God bless him.

While one who sings with his tongue on fire
Gargles in the rat race choir
Bent out of shape from society's pliers
Cares not to come up any higher
But rather get you down in the hole
That he's in.

But I mean no harm nor put fault
On anyone that lives in a vault
But it's alright, Ma, if I can't please him.

Old lady judges watch people in pairs
Limited in sex, they dare
To push fake morals, insult and stare
While money doesn't talk, it swears
Obscenity, who really cares
Propaganda, all is phony.

While them that defend what they cannot see
With a killer's pride, security
It blows the minds most bitterly
For them that think death's honesty
Won't fall upon them naturally
Life sometimes
Must get lonely.

My eyes collide head-on with stuffed graveyards
False gods, I scuff
At pettiness which plays so rough
Walk upside-down inside handcuffs
Kick my legs to crash it off
Say okay, I have had enough
What else can you show me?

And if my thought-dreams could be seen
They'd probably put my head in a guillotine
But it's alright, Ma, it's life, and life only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalsoldier5 Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
65. Because it has nothing to do with the situation we're in NOW.
I know a lot of people want to pull out today because the reason we went to war back in 2003 was wrong/false/unjust/immoral/whatever. But that's not a logical or politically sound argument to make against the war now. As Jon Stewart said, Iraq now actually IS the place they said it would be back in '03 (al Qaeda IS in Iraq now).

Think about it. If half way through the Civil War it was revealed that the attack on Fort Sumter was staged, would you have advocated an immediate surrender by the North because of it? Of course, not.

My reason for "opposing" the war is what every Democratic leader should be repeating: It is the wrong place to fight terrorism and is making al Qaeda stronger. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #65
71. The comparison is not valid. OUR civil war was OUR civil war. It was OUR country
Iraq is not OUR country. I want to pull out for the very simple reason that we have no business there.

Incidently, you are correct, it is the wrong place to fight terrorism. You don't invade countries to fight terrorism.

If a country attacks you, that is an act of war, and you declare war against that country.

If a terrorist group attacks you, you work with the world community to fight those terrorist organizations


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
69. 9/11 was just one volley in an on-going war
I seem to remember we invaded Iraq in 1991, and never really left. It was a slow-simmer during the Clinton years, small-time killing in the no-fly zones. But somebody was on the ground spotting targets for the bombing runs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. Yeah. That's why UNSCOM got thrown out,
remember? Because Clinton was using the material gained from the inspection process to bomb the hell out of the place.

Way to go, folks. Poppa Bush bombs the hell out of the civilian infrastructure in Gulf I, Clinton uses a supposedly neutral party to bomb the hell out of the place again, and imposes sanctions that mean that Saddam has a hard time feeding his people and can't ever recover from the bombing of civilian infrastructure, and then Baby Bush comes in to finish the job. Right. Really good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC