Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: "We foresee occupying those wells very quickly'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:29 AM
Original message
Bush: "We foresee occupying those wells very quickly'
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 08:37 AM by Botany
We have a madman in the White House. Ready to go to war no matter what .....
Saddam was willing to leave Iraq and bush refused to listen to the U.N.

****************************************************************************************
http://www.juancole.com/2007/09/bush-aznar-transcript-war-crime-of.html

Bush-Aznar Transcript: The War Crime of the Century Juan Cole

I made two claims about the transcript published by El Pais of Bush's conversations with Spanish leader Jose Maria
Aznar on 22 February, 2003, at Crawford, Texas.

The first is that the transcript shows that Bush intended to disregard a negative outcome in his quest for a UN
Security Council resolution authorizing a war against Iraq. Bush wanted such a resolution. He expressed a willingness
to use threats and economic coercion to secure it. But he makes it perfectly clear that he will not wait for the UNSC
to act beyond mid-March. He also explicitly says that if any of the permanent members of the UNSC uses its veto,
"we will go." That is, failure to secure the resolution would trigger the war.

Uh, that is the opposite of the way it is supposed to work. If you can't get a UNSC resolution, and you haven't
been attacked by the state against whom you want to go to war, then you are supposed to stand down.

Both because he set a deadline beyond which his "patience" would not stretch (the poor thing had already waited
four months; I mean, is he a toddler that he lacks elementary patience?), and because he specified a UNSC veto
as a signal for his launching of the war, Bush made it very clear that he was willing to trash the charter of the
United Nations and to take the world back to the 1930s,to an era of mass politics when powerful states launched
wars of choice at will on the basis of fevered rhetoric and fits of pique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if the State Dept. is pushing back on the madman, or just
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wish I could say that this is a surprise.......
The only surprise left to me is that the signposts of totalitarianism are being ignored, and the US is sleepwalking to totalitarianism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC