Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists Find Oldest Living Animal, Then Kill It

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:22 PM
Original message
Scientists Find Oldest Living Animal, Then Kill It
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,306076,00.html

Only after researchers cut through its shell, which made it more of an ex-clam, and counted its growth rings did they realize how old it had been — between 405 and 410 years old.

Another clam of the same species had been verified at 220 years old, and a third may have lived 374 years. But this most recent clam was the oldest yet.

"Its death is an unfortunate aspect of this work, but we hope to derive lots of information from it," postdoctoral scientist Al Wanamaker told London's Guardian newspaper. "For our work, it's a bonus, but it wasn't good for this particular animal."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I say we burn down the observatory so this can never happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. WTF are those assholes doing??? Disgusting and Criminal...Clams have Rights too
Murdering Clams is a Felony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Anyone want
some antique clam chowder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I bet it's a little chewy
400 year old clam.

They did not know it was 400 years old until it was already dead. Aging fish involves removing bones called otoliths from the ear, which means the fish is dead. But this info is very important in managing fisheries. You have to know the age structure of the population in order to set bag limits, size limits, etc. Shellfish are probably a little different but I would guess the same information is needed, although most invertebrates are nowhere near that old. Most (shrimp, crabs, etc) live only a few years. I had no idea they could age clams although it makes sense given that the shell is deposited on a yearly basis. Like tree rings. But also the width of those rings tells the scientists about the conditions. I suppose wider rings=more growth and better growing conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. How apropos -- man destroys and kills that which he does not understand.
What a waste is our species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's called fisheries biology
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 02:48 PM by alarimer
It happens all the time.

I have no problem with what they did. None at all.

I do the same thing myself many times. Only we use gill nets and study fish but the principal is the same. We take otoliths to age the fish, fin clips for genetic analysis, samples of reproductive tissue sometimes, and many other things.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And I might add...
That sound Fisheries Biology leads to sound Fisheries management, which results in far healthier stocks of fish, better habitat and sane fishing quotas.

Let's not go all Bambi here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And I might add...
you've got to crack a few shells if you want fried clams.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. ...:::droooooollllll:::...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Let's not go all Bambi here.
That's pretty damn funny right there.

:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. They killed BAMBI-CLAM?
Damn those scientists for doing research! DAMN them I say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. That's Clambi.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Yep, Let's Hear It For Ruthless Efficiency
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 04:31 PM by Crisco
I hope they at least ate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
44. Off in a parallel universe, a group of ambulatory, digit possessing
Giant clams is beheading a four hundred year old human - the oldest living human
on planet ZabnaMayo. The "Save the Human" crowd is muffled by the security forces of
the Clam-ian science and research committees.

And so it goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Apparently, it's not.
It wasn't a run-of-the-mill sample. It was a 400 year old organism.

Not to state the obvious, but that was the reason for the article. And who knows how long it could have lived had it not been killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Uh but the point is they DIDN'T know that when they killed it..
and they wouldn't have known it without killing it unfortunately. I highly doubt they would have killed it if they had known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
40. And, thus, our little conversation has come full circle. Indeed, how apropos.
Only at the end do they understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Maybe it had syphon cancer and wanted to die.
God bless these scientists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Actually, we'll kill pretty much anything that moves
whether we understand it or not



But the white men,...

...they believe
everything is dead:...

...stone, earth, animals,...

...and people,
even their own people.

If things keep trying to live,
white men will rub them out.

Old Lodge Skins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Beats eating it and throwing the shell in the trash. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Did they jump up and down and wave their foam fingers in the air?
chanting UK, UK, UK, after they killed it ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Later that night...
the scientists cried about the loss of such an amazing creature killed by their own hands, over a nice yummy meal of linguine with clam sauce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. "The time has come," the Walrus said, "to talk of many things..."
"It seems a shame," the Walrus said,
"To play them such a trick,
After we've brought them out so far,
And made them trot so quick!"
The Carpenter said nothing but
"The butter's spread too thick!"

"I weep for you," the Walrus said:
"I deeply sympathize."
With sobs and tears he sorted out
Those of the largest size,
Holding his pocket-handkerchief
Before his streaming eyes.

http://www.jabberwocky.com/carroll/walrus.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. well at 410 years old it had a good run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Actually, they killed it and then found it, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. I am sorry, but their research was just spoiled by killing the clam.
Now no one will be able to ascertain how long it might have lived. If it was obviously old, why not observe even if took generations? Otherwise, if its age was not important. why kill it at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. It sounds like it was a deep ocean animal
A lot of those die when brought to the surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. Nope. 80 meters is within human diving limits - 8 atmospheres of pressure at that depth.
While recreational divers should limit themselves to 120' (about 37 meters), mixed gas and decompression diving can go to 80 meters or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. It lived that long without universsal health care?
Which is what, I am sure, the freeptards are saying about it all. If not, give it time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. Headline should be, "Scientists kill clam, find it was oldest living animal." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. Too typical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. Pass the wasabi


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. Holy Mollusk.
I had no idea those things could live that long!!! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Me either. 400 years and stupid scientists kill it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blashyrkh Donating Member (816 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. You are refusing to acknowledge that the scientists did not know the age when they killed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. I realize they didn't know the age when they killed. It still sucks that the clam is dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Some people won't understand
It makes me sick at times, and then I remember Rachel Carsen taking in the specimens that she needed as a biologist.
After she finished her work, she returned them to the exact spot where the creature had been picked up.

If she could include compassion for everything in her science work, why can't other scientists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. Stupid scientists?
errrr...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
32. Fox News sucks
This is a shitty headline and the whole article sounds very anti-science.

At least killing this clam is better than the story of the oldest living TREE. That's a shitty story if ever there was one. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
33. Impossible, only OT people lived to be that old.
Have they checked these clams for Satan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
34. Guess it shouldn't have clammed up and it was already used to waterboarding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
36. Is a clam really an animal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. uhhhh, yeah. it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. No, it's a plant.
:eyes:

But seriously, does this have to do with your alternative science you're always carping about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
38. What a stupid headline and article....oh, it's Faux Noise.
Try these instead:

At 400, clam may be longest-lived animal known
http://www.world-science.net/othernews/071030_old-clam.htm

400-Year-Old Clam Found in Iceland's Waters, Scientists Say
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=ad4uc7L9CwTw&refer=europe

Clam claims oldest animal record
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/29/clam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
39. Boy kills bird he's never seen before...
then finds out it was the very last wild Passenger Pigeon in existence...

http://www.sciencenetlinks.com/lessons.cfm?BenchmarkID=5&DocID=374
The last recorded wild Passenger Pigeon was shot by a 14-year-old boy of Sargents in Pike County, Ohio on March 24th, 1900. The boy, Press Clay Southworth, died at the age of 94 in 1979. In 1970, he recounted the details of that day:

While feeding the family cows, Press observed a strange bird eating grains of corn in the barnyard. He was very familiar with local birds but did not recognize this one. Young Press asked his mother for permission to take the shotgun and shoot the bird, which he most certainly did in a single shot. His parents quickly identified the bird as a Passenger Pigeon, having seen them in great numbers in their youth. They told him to take the bird to a local lady who was known to do taxidermy. Mrs. Barnes mounted the Pigeon and used buttons for its eyes, hence the birds' nickname "Buttons." Many years later, Mrs. Barnes offered the bird to the state museum in Ohio, and apparently it was not until then that ornithologists determined it to be the last authentic record of a wild Passenger Pigeon.

Ooops! Oh well. I'm sure they derived lots of information from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
47. The headline is misleading...should be the other way around.
"Scientists kill oldest living animal, then discovered it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC