Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Garrity protection is NOT immunity - Blackwater controversy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:38 PM
Original message
Garrity protection is NOT immunity - Blackwater controversy
People need to quit claiming that under Garrity, Blackwater employees are receiving "immunity".

Normally Garrity protection is for law enforcement and works this way: since police officers are compelled to answer questions about incidents and their jobs, then any information compelled can't be used in a CRIMINAL trial and can only be used administratively. Thus, police officers receive the same sort of constitutional protections as anyone else against self-incrimination when it comes to criminal matters.


I'm not sure how Garrity protection is being afforded to the Blackwater operatives, but it is not the same as immunity. Just a clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. We, as a country, have lost our collective minds....
Only since Dumbya came to power has anyone been able to manipulate the masses so easily. Are there drugs in the water?

The suspension of disbelief is amazing to me: They make up a name exactly opposite their true intention for any program they want to shove down our throats and just run with it. Nancy Polosi just about admitted that she'd vote for any * program with "Security" in the title.

Along the same lines, Garrity was never intended to apply to contractors. Again, they have stretched another law or statute beyond breaking point and don't expect anyone to call them on it. Well, us, but that's just us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree, they are different....
and I don't believe the State Department has the authority to offer either immunity or garrity protections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC