Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Number of Homeless Sex Offenders Heads Up (limited housing options)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 11:57 AM
Original message
Number of Homeless Sex Offenders Heads Up (limited housing options)
Number of Homeless Sex Offenders Heads Up

They're sleeping in cars, shelters and occasionally, porches. About half a dozen of Sacramento's highest risk sex offenders are now on the streets, unable to find housing that meets the legal requirements of Jessica's Law.

"If they can't eat, and they can't put food on their family's table, they will go underground," said defense attorney Michael Chastaine. "We're going to force them into that situation."

It's an unintended consequence of Jessica's Law, a 2006 voter-approved ballot measure that sought to crackdown on California sex offenders. The law increases punishments, requires lifetime GPS monitoring for some offenders and established a new housing ban - prohibiting registered sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school or park.

Faced with limited housing options, many offenders no longer have an established legal residence. Since the law took effect last year, the Attorney General's Office says the number of homeless sex offenders has jumped 27 percent, now reaching 2,711 offenders statewide.

http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=34752
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Boston Legal just did a show based on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. this has been occuring for years now----I do not think these people should
be publicly branded for life.
I do not have the answer for this either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There are SOME who need to be watched and guarded against
for life. But certainly not every single one who winds up on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC