Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Impeach Cheney: Activity #2 & 3

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:12 AM
Original message
Impeach Cheney: Activity #2 & 3

Today I would like to start by sharing a story with you that sums up a lot of both the good and bad in politics today. One of my cousins told me about this yesterday.

On Tuesday, my elderly aunt volunteered to work the polls in a city in Pennsylvania. There were two contests in particular that my aunt was focused on, in which democrats were looking to unseat corrupt republican county commissioners. She worked from 7 am to 7 pm, in the cold, rainy weather.

Other people worked for shorter periods, including a young aide for one of the republicans. Towards the end of the evening, he approached my cousin, unaware that she was the daughter of the elderly woman he pointed to. "Look at her," he said. "I don’t get it. She’s been here all day. It’s not like she’s going to get a job out of this. Not at her age."

Too many people are focused on "politics" for personal gain, a job, money, or power. They are as confused as this young man was when someone invests in doing something simply because of their beliefs. My aunt is the type of person who not only acts upon her beliefs, but who would not ask anyone to do something she was unwilling to do herself.

My grandfather came to this country from Ireland in the late 1800s. Other family members were already here. Some of his sisters worked in and around New York City, and they used to put together their nickels and dimes in savings. And with these savings, they were able to pay for my aunt to attend Syracuse University.

Among other jobs, my aunt ran a large human service agency, and taught at two universities. Her late husband was a nationally known professor. They were friends with a former governor, and my cousins are all friends with a neighbor who now sits in the US Senate. My aunt wasn’t standing in the rain on Tuesday because she was looking for a job; she was there because she believes strongly in the traditional democratic values that allowed the daughter of immigrants to live the life she has, and to open the door for other young men and women to have those same opportunities. But the republican aide only saw an old woman, standing in the rain for hours.

I think that some in Washington view the people on this forum with the same eyes that the young republican aide viewed my aunt. They view our dedication to a cause, without any thought of personal gain, as a foreign concept.

But there are others who understand. Today, I am hoping that we can take a few minutes to contact two of them, Congresswomen Lynn Woolsey and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. I think we should thank them for their work, and encourage them to do everything they can to push for the impeachment of VP Dick Cheney.

I also want to encourage people to put their nickels and dimes together when these two are running for re-election. Even if we are not from their district, they represent us: Rep. Woolsey is the Co-Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and Rep. Wasserman Schultz is on the Judiciary Committee.

To contact Rep. Woolsey, call 202-225-5161; fax 202-225-5163; or, if you are outside her district, use the following e-mail, Att: Rep. Woolsey:

http://cpc.lee.house.gov/index.cfm?SectionID=15&ParentID=0&SectionTypeID=5&SectionTree=15

For Rep Debbie Wasserman Schultz: phone 202-225-7931; fax 202-226-2052; and to e-mail from out of her district, do so c/o:

http://judiciary.house.gov/contact.aspx

Thank you for your help with this.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. As Soon As The Clock Strikes 9
I will be on this. Yes, I'm afraid the 'whataya/it gonna do for me' viewpoint is all too prevalent, just ask Duke Cunningham and all those facing corruption scandals. It's the Ted Stevens' branch of the republicon party. Though not limited solely to that group. To my mind the DLC is our representative of 'hands out' dems. Btw, those 2 races your lovely Aunt was interested in, how did they turn out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Thanks!
There are times that it seems clear that there are people who speak very different languages when it comes to politics. That is evident in some of the discussions on DU.

My cousin had e-mailed me in the early morning hours, and didn't mention the outcome of the elections. I'll ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. The answer:
My cousin just said their candidates won by landslides. My aunt and cousins helped to replace a total of six republicans with six democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. Wohoo
:thumbsup: :applause: :patriot: :rofl: :party: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. I got an error message with the first email-
but I went ahead and emailed pelosi,hoyer,wasserman-schultz,the judiciary committee,and(ahem)Joe Barton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thank you.
If anyone has an e-mail for her that works, it would be appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm hoping it's because her mailbox is FULL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
26. This Is The Form On Her Site
though it would be better to have a more direct route

http://woolsey.house.gov/contactemailform.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. I think that
you have to be from her district to use that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. You got my help right now... done....
Talked directly to Wasserman's staff, but left Woosley's staff a message.

BTW, that was a genuinely GOOD story. Thanks for sharing it here.

My family of Italian immigrants had, in their own way, a message of nourishing the notion to take your role as US citizen seriously. Southern Italians understand what it is to have one invading force after another with dictators and fascism.

I'm also recommending this... :kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Great!
Thank you very much. I appreciate your help on this.

Years ago, I wrote a book about the history of Irish immigrants who worked the railroads in the NYC-NJ area. I found that the Italian families had much the same experience. Both groups would serve as the foundation for the traditional democratic values that were such an important part of our nation's history. One of my favorite politicians was Governor Cuomo, who spoke openly about the values he had from his growing up in an extended family that was invested in the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. I'm raising a glass (later this evening) to all you historians...
There seems to be a re-curring theme in all those stories. I think it must shape us. The books I've spent time with are "Unto the Sons" by Gay Talese, and "Peoples History of the United States" (still reading) by Howard Zinn.

What is the name of your book and is it still available?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Done
So nice to be able to call and say someone is doing a terrific job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. WTF? My original Thank You and K&R for this thread was deleted? I'll K&R again then.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I wondered
about that, too. I was getting ready to thank you for your support, which I appreciate very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. K & R nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. FYI: Woolsey is a co-sponsor of H.Res.333-- Wasserman Schultz is not
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 08:54 AM by antigop
Current co-sponsors:

Rep Baldwin, Tammy - 8/1/2007
Rep Brady, Robert A. - 7/24/2007
Rep Clarke, Yvette D. - 6/6/2007
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy - 5/1/2007
Rep Cohen, Steve - 8/4/2007
Rep Davis, Danny K. - 11/5/2007
Rep Ellison, Keith - 6/28/2007
Rep Farr, Sam - 7/12/2007
Rep Filner, Bob - 7/12/2007
Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila - 8/4/2007
Rep Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. - 6/28/2007
Rep Kilpatrick, Carolyn C. - 9/7/2007
Rep Lee, Barbara - 6/7/2007
Rep McDermott, Jim - 7/10/2007
Rep Moran, James P. - 7/10/2007
Rep Payne, Donald M. - 8/1/2007
Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. - 5/1/2007
Rep Towns, Edolphus - 9/27/2007
Rep Waters, Maxine - 6/12/2007
Rep Watson, Diane E. - 10/16/2007
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. - 6/7/2007
Rep Wynn, Albert Russell - 5/10/2007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. You Beat Me To It
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 09:01 AM by Me.
When I called her staffer asked if I knew and I thought it would be important info to pass on. Also:

John Conyers says he will hold hearings

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2234871

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. And didn't Rep. Wasserman Schultz vote to table the motion?
I think this is the roll call vote.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll1037.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Just as we
lobbied Rep Conyers yesterday, recognizing that he is generally progressive and asking him to help us on this issue, we should also lobby Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Here is what her website says ...
http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/fl20_schultz/HRes333statement


Statement from Rep. Wasserman Schultz regarding H.Res. 333


November 6, 2007

(Washington, DC) -- “Impeachment is the most severe action that the Congress can take against the Executive Branch and the consideration of articles of impeachment must not be taken lightly. The charges outlined in H.Res. 333 calling for the impeachment of Vice-President Cheney are serious and deserve more than an hour of debate without the ability to present evidence. As such, I have voted to refer this resolution to the House Judiciary Committee so that the charges outlined can be heard and debated.

“Today, Congress also overrode the President’s veto of the Water Resources Development Act, which among other things authorizes $2 billion for Everglades restoration as well as hurricane recovery and beach erosion funds. We are currently fighting to pass –against the President’s objections and his veto, legislation that would provide health insurance for an additional 3.5 million American children, 230,000 more insured children in Florida alone. Working to end the War in Iraq, expanding SCHIP, passing the first increase in the minimum wage in 10 years, passing the largest veterans health care increase in the 77-year history of the VA, and passing a roughly $1 billion increase in Everglades funding, all of these are issues that Congress has been addressing since the Democratic-led 110th Congress began in January.”

“Impeachment is a lengthy process which would divide Congress and this nation even more deeply than we are divided right now. Referring this resolution to the House Judiciary Committee is the constitutionally appropriate process that should be pursued.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Bruce Fein & John Nichols Define Impeachment
as a cure rather than a punishment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Right.
Some of our friends in Washington are seeing this in a way that I think we should try to understand, so that we can help them adjust their perception. I really like and respect Rep. Conyers and Wasserman Schultz, but they err on certain aspects of their view of impeachment. Of course it is not pleasant, and it can be expected to create some hostilities. But it is necessary. We cannot hope to heal as a society when we do not respect the rule of law. And we cannot ignore it when our friends -- even our good friends -- fail to uphold their oath of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
52. I just sent this
to: http://judiciary.house.gov/Contact.aspx

Re: Impeachment of Richard Cheney

I'm in support of impeachment for several reasons:

This administration has no respect for our Constitution nor the law in general; this feeling is shared by a majority in this country as well as those who live in other countries.

If our Congress allows this administration's dirty business to go unanswered, Congress is, in effect, laying out a large "welcome" mat for future abusive presidencies against the Constitution.

The Constitution requires that this administration's crimes be answerable. We, the people, seem to understand this more than those who are in Washington to represent us. The anguish that we have suffered through this administration will not heal until we are shown that those responsible are answerable to the law. The anguish will only deepen.

As Bruce Fein, a Republican, said, "Impeachment is not a punishment. It is a cure." No truer words were spoken for this nightmare we are in.

Thank you for your consideration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. OK, will do. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Right.
Rep Woolsey also issued a great statement of support for the Resolution to Impeach Cheney yesterday. I'll try to find a link. I think it is:

http://woolsey.house.gov/latestnews.asp?ARTICLE5110=2152039

Rep. Wasserman Schultz is not a co-sponsor of the Resolution, but is in a position to assist us. All members of the Judiciary are worth contacting. She is generally a progressive democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. OK, I was just a little confused. Thanks for staying on top of this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I should have
made it clearer in the OP. Thank you for helping to make that clearer!

There are a growing number of democrats in congress who recognize the importance of impeaching VP Cheney. Some are freshmen, others have been there longer. When we "lobby" these individuals, their staffs take notice, and discuss it with friend who work for other representatives.

The coordinated grass roots efforts, which include our friends on DU, are getting plenty of attention. There will be people who are tasked with trying to discourage the grass roots activists, by trying to advocate the bump-on-a-log, we-can't-risk-losing approach. In fact, the more effective we are, the more sticks-in-the-muds we'll encounter. In response, we must increase our lobbying efforts -- hence my request that people contact Wasserman Schultz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
50. Where is Barbara Jordan when we need her???
:shrug:

"My faith in the Constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total. And I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution.

"If the impeachment provision in the Constitution of the United States will not reach the offenses charged here, then perhaps that 18th-century Constitution should be abandoned to a 20th-century paper shredder."

--Barbara Jordan, July 25, 1974, House Judiciary committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
21. Link to Impeach Cheney: Activity #1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
24. I jsut sent some encouraging words to the email addys you supplied.
I hope you will help us flag their races when the time comes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
29. Here is an account of Wasserman Schultz's position
as stated in an interview this morning. Might give people a place to start with her:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2235562
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Thank you.
She has some errors in perception regarding impeachment. It is not uncommon for people to have difficulty in seeing a picture objectively when they are standing inside the frame. That is why it is important for us to politely lobby her, and help her to reframe the issue of impeachment.

Some of our friends in Washington are being pressured to take the stance she is taking. We need to be consistent in our efforts, and help them to understand the many reasons why they need to impeach VP Cheney.

Some of our friends like to talk to us when re-election time comes around. We need to use this as a basic building block in our attempts to openly communicate to them that honoring their oath of office -- to protect the Constitution -- is an essential part of any discussion we can have in the future.

And it helps people who work in their offices to know that the same people who are contacting Rep. Wasserman Shultz are contacting Rep. Woolsey. Those aides communicate, too. Any politician who wants to be successful today needs to be able to access the support of people outside their district when campaign time comes up. We are sending a clear message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. The aides communicate, that's true. Also, letting them know
both are being contacted helps diffuse the feeling of being picked on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Thanks. I was trying to find a way to compose my thoughts about her position.
I'm finding it hard to believe she isn't totally behind impeachment.

How nerve wracking. As if they even represent US. US, the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. There is a lot
going on behind the scenes right now. We need to be steady, polite, and firm in our coordinated effort. Even when an aide says that a representative isn't supporting us, we need to continue to make the calls and send the e-mails.

Two of the most important points, in my opinion, are to remind our friends who say that congress has to concentrate on ending the war in Iraq that: (a) congress has supported every administration to increase the investment of money and troops in Iraq, including since becoming the majority in both the House and Senate this year; and (b) that history shows President Nixon became willing to discuss ending the war in Vietnam when he recognized that impeachment was becoming likely -- and there is not a single bit of historical evidence to support the claim that impeachment would interfere with efforts to end the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Key points. Thanks.
We're in the middle. That's progress. Now the momentum needs to keep going. I don't know how much of what we hear is bluff. But there is little doubt in my mind that we're playing high stakes poker. Who knows what members really believe, in private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
30. Dennis Wants Emails Too
ttp://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2229057
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
32. Rep. Carol Shea Porter Is Calling For Gearings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Don't forget to thank the staff. You'd be surprised at the reaction sometimes! .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. You Are So Right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
38. I just spoke with Rep. Wasserman's aide.
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 03:26 PM by Gregorian
When I made my case for impeachment, the first aide transfered me to one of the other aides who had more experience. She stated the reasons for Rep. Wasserman's position on impeachment. That we only have 12 months. That we need to create a new health care system. That we don't want to divide the two parties on issues where we already get along.

I tried to mention that we had this same dividing in 1998. But she was adamant that this was the position they held.

I don't know what legislation will or will not be passed before the end of this term. I do know that impeachment doesn't end with this administration leaving office. We have time. The way I see it is, we just don't have the same sense of importance.

As if we're going to pass any meaningful legislation. I know that's sarcastic. But as if we are not partisan about anything. Again, sarcastic.

I think the harm done to America by not impeaching, far exceeds the time lost to legislation. Legislation that has so far not been inacted for many years now.

It's time to impeach. It's vital to impeach.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Thank you.
I think we can expect her office to keep saying this publicly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
40. done
r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
42. Done. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
44. Evening Kick
Faxes and emails can still be sent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
46. Kicking
and hoping we'll get to work in Impeaching Bush immediately after Cheney.

Thanks again H20Man.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. It's interesting .....
I've been in contact with someone I know who believes that Cheney has committed offenses that warrent impeachment, but who takes the official position that there isn't time, it's too divisive, and that we need to focus on '08. But that person is impressed with the recent surge in calls, e-mails, and fax to congress asking for impeachment. The progressive grass roots are being heard. And the attempt to identify the impeachment movement as "ultra left wing" is failing, because we are identifying with the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. I have felt that it would happen in time, and from the bottom up.
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 06:41 PM by mzmolly
Perhaps this really is the beginning?

I am a person who is also concerned with 2008. I make no bones about that. I do not want to see Cheney removed and Guliani inserted in his place just in time to claim "experience" before the coming election. Cheney has a lower approval rating than dung, the right wing would like nothing more than to scrape him off of their collective shoes.

Regarding honoring the Constitution (which is our collective desire) I agree with Bruce Fein that Bush must also be impeached. GWB certainly was not a victim in the crimes of his administration. According to Paul O'Neil * had a desire to invade Iraq from the moment he stepped into office. The buck stops with him, as does my desire for justice.

I am a supporter of impeaching both criminals though I applaud your efforts (and the efforts of others) to begin with Cheney. And, I applaud your wonderful Aunt for her contributions as well.

From one Irish American to another,
Peace

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
47. Thank you for sharing this heartwarming story about a true patriot,
who returns the favors she is so grateful to acknowledge. A rare and formidable trait. I hope the young PUG got taught a lesson by your cousin and your aunt. When I hear of young GOPers like this, I cannot forget the young monsters who went to Floida in 2000 to stop the legitimate recount of the presidential misconduct....may they burn in ________for the crime against humanity which they and the Bushes and the Felonious 5 imposed on the citizens of the world. My heart breaks for the loved ones of the Iraqis who have been killed for oil by the egregious and greedy neo-cons and for the poor soldiers who were swept into this debacle simply because they yearned for a chance for a better life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
49. "Corrupt Republican" is a redundancy n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
53. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
54. I should have known you were a fight'n Irishman!
:toast: Please promise to give your Aunt a great big hug just from me! :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
55. lynn Woolsey is a wonderful person and a total servant to her constituents
She schedules meetings with individual constituents several times a year. You get fifteen to twenty minutes ALONE with her. Regardless of who you are.

Don't need to contribute to her campaign. Or represent a corporate interest.

She is very cunning and very aware. And when I think of the Mohawk nation, with its notion of "seven generations" and of choosing their leaders from the twelve best grandmothers, I think of Lynn.

I was very lucky to have her as my Representative till I moved from Marin, CA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
56. Wasserman-Schultz needs phone calls
Edited on Fri Nov-09-07 12:53 PM by hawkowl88
I heard her interviewed on the Ed Schultz show yesterday, Nov. 8, and she was adamantly against impeaching Cheney. She spouted the party line about all the reasons it wasn't practical, not enough time, too distracting, yada, yada, yada.

HOWEVER, she kept coming back to the fact that in her district, there just wasn't ANY support for impeachment. This is where people can make a difference like no other time in their lives. CALL. WRITE A LETTER. Not an email. Get your friends, relatives, etc. If you live in her district, and you can put together a few hundred phone calls, you can not overestimate the effect you will have.

It was clear in the interview, that she has made a political calculation to stick with the so-called leadership, because she views the risk from a backlash of angry constituents as very low.

Change her mind! Don't be angry in the phone calls, but DO be passionate. If she gets enough calls, she will change her mind. (It is often easier to get thru to one of the local offices.)

Her phone number again: Washington: 202-225-7931; Aventura FL:305-936-5724;
Pembroke Pines FL: 954-437-3936.

Call NOW! YOU CAN MAKE HISTORY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
57. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC