|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:23 PM Original message |
Let's talk about 'Generation Jones'... those born between 1954 and 1965. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. I have never voted for a Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. Doing everything I can to skew the numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. Happy birthday on Saturday... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
24. i was born in 1959 and im as left as can be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #24 |
88. another 59er here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
61. Born March 1965 and the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MotorCityMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
37. Another member of the (birth) class of 64 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
4. Whats to talk about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Exactly. I despise this broad-brush generalizations, anyway. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. They are? That's me and most of my friends ... all lifelong liberal Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
6. 1954 still qualifies as "Boomer", no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
46. as well as 1955 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
76. The traditional definition has been 1946-1964, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #76 |
93. that definition sucks though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #93 |
102. The best dates I've seen for the Boomers is 1943-1960 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
7. Those were actually the second cohort of Boomers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
45. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #45 |
59. I was Born in March 1954 and Had a Lottery Number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. The draft ended on July 1, 1973 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 02:17 AM Response to Reply #64 |
105. This Was in Spring 1972 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
60. I was born in 56 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #45 |
71. Women that age are the majority of Code Pink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dpbrown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. 1959 - I have never voted for a Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
9. That'smy age group, and most of my friends are Democrats, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
10. odd, I fit nothing of that profile... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
11. Oh, bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Agreed and Well Said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. What she said. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cenacle (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. there's freaks in every generation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
13. 'Generation Jones' was brought up in a thread in the lounge... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
14. Another wrong stereotype I'm generation Jones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
15. More labeling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. LOL-- I'm from the very beginning of that demographic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthernSpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
17. Generation "Jones"? What are they jonesing for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
begin_within (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. A word in edgewise, between the Boomers and Gen X |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lukasahero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. LOL and touche!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yella_dawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
19. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Not my generalizations. See the links. For some reason, it seems that it's AOK to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yella_dawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. Sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mr_hat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
20. I can't decide whether disco was our fault, or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
22. Yes, I'm here at DU because I voted for Bush, am a Regan conservative, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
26. I'm just going to say this. Most of you obviously didn't go to my high school... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthernSpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #26 |
43. I got the sense that (per the author) they're an awfully unrealistic bunch... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
begin_within (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
28. I was born in 1960, and I certainly never voted for Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
29. I never voted for bush. I am not at all conservative. I'm not a 'security mom" or a soccer mom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. That must mean that everyone born between 1955-65 is same as you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:14 PM Response to Reply #32 |
48. I think broad brush generalizations are pretty useless. What specifically do you believe is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #48 |
56. How many years has a Dem been in the White House since you started voting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #56 |
84. Plus 4 years of Jimmy Carter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:44 PM Response to Reply #56 |
92. And when was the oasis era of true liberalism before then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 06:05 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Yeah well, you have your work cut out for yourself... Best of luck with that generation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:36 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. No point in debating this further with you :( n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #96 |
103. I sorry but based on most of people I grew up with, I buy the stereotype... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zookeeper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
31. I've never voted for a Republican, I'm not religious.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kineneb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
34. does not describe me or my friends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
35. '56-NEVER voted for EITHER BUSH, or Reagan, am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
36. everyone born between '54 and '65 voted for Bush? link? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. First link in OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
38. What a load of crapola! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
39. '57 here. Carter was my first election. Never voted for a republican for President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
41. I thought that the tail end of the baby boomers was 1964? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
44. That's right DU, you don't fit the demographic - it must not be real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #44 |
52. I don't think anybody doubts that there are those types but it's the broad swipe we don't care for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. That may well be but there's validity to those broad strokes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
47. 1962 Here and I'm a Liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
49. Katherine Harris, Frank Luntz, Laura Ingraham, Nah! There ain't Generation Jones! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Sadly, Kirk Cameron is my vintage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #51 |
101. A GenXer, no less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
50. That's a bit of a broad-brush statement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Good to know about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftHander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
54. I've been talking about this generation (mine) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
57. Born in 55, politically active since 68 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I'd put the swath at 1960-1965 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
62. It ain't me, babe--born in '61 and immediately clad in a red diaper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pamela (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
63. I'm glad you posted this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
65. As a gross generalization I'd say, yes, that generation sucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthernSpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #65 |
82. so they're really Generation Johnson... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
66. Whew... 1953... I just made it out of this category |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movie_girl99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
67. 1965 here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
80. HOw can someone talk about a generation without making generalizations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
68. I would strongly disagree with the lower date range |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
69. Born in 1956. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
70. No we are not the 30-something yuppies of the 80's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #70 |
90. Thank you. I was born in '63 and had a purple mohawk during the '80's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
72. Who comes up with these idiot sub-categories? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
73. Please do NOT throw me in with the Bush voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
74. And if they voted for Kerry in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
75. Born in 1963...came out of the womb a liberal and I've been going left ever since... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
77. yeah, they have me all figured out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w8liftinglady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
78. 1959-never voted repub |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
79. I was born in 1960 and despise being lectured by older boomers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:22 PM Response to Reply #79 |
83. Bingo. I think my ENTIRE college class was HORRIFIED when Reagan won the 1980 election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #79 |
85. It isn't so much a generational thing as it is a regional one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
81. I'm so liberal, I have to make three lefts to make a right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
86. Yeah! Let's talk about some "them"s. They're the problem! Not us! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
87. Had no idea they had a name for my generation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
89. Oh yeah, I had no idea there were so many old people here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. shit, i'm too old to participate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday Afternoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
95. Generation Jones? I guess I was jones-ing to be a Boomer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeeBGBz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
97. July '54. I'd chew my arm off before I would ever vote for Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
98. The Boomer generation lasted until 1964, according to all info I have seen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piesRsquare (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
99. Generation Jones gave us Punk... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:42 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. Thank you, we're pretty proud of it ourselves! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
104. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 02:25 AM Response to Original message |
106. Nice try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 02:29 AM Response to Original message |
107. Artificial construct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 02:44 AM Response to Original message |
108. Yes, those broad-brush generational slams are so fucking productive, aren't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 06:51 AM Response to Original message |
109. IQs had started to plummet at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 06:55 AM Response to Original message |
110. Way to unite the country Barak. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bongo Prophet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
111. To paint an accurate portrait, it helps to have a finer brush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC