Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Floyd: Shotgun Wedding: The Saint, the Insurgent and the Surge's "Success"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 04:57 PM
Original message
Chris Floyd: Shotgun Wedding: The Saint, the Insurgent and the Surge's "Success"
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 04:58 PM by babylonsister
Shotgun Wedding: The Saint, the Insurgent and the Surge's "Success"
Sunday, 11 November 2007
by Chris Floyd

Although 2007 will have seen the largest number of American military deaths in Iraq and the passing of the one million mark in Iraqi civilians killed, there has been much triumphant harrumphing of late about a slight drop in the horrific death count in Iraq — proof, we are told, for the umpteenth time, that the war of aggression has finally "turned the corner" (i.e., the conquered people have finally been beaten into submission).

To the extent that there has been any lessening of the ongoing slaughter for a short period, much of that can be put down to a factor little discussed in the American media-political bubble (at least not in terms of stark reality): the fact that the White House and St. Gen. David Petraeus have simply legitimized what used to be recorded as terrorist acitivity by paying the former killers of Americans to kill and repress other Iraqis. Thus, in some areas of Baghdad now controlled by American-paid, American-armed Sunni extremist militias, executions, mass killings, horrific torture, kidnapping and rampant extortion still go on — but these are no longer counted as "insurgent violence." These horrors are now regarded as legitimate police actions by "concerned citizens" groups — almost all of them former close allies of the most savage sectarian bands (now loosely called "al Qaeda" by everyone, regardless of any actual relationship, however tenuous, to the gang of one-time CIA ally Osama bin Laden).

In other words, Bush and St. David are now giving American taxpayer money — and copious amounts of arms, equipment and flash vehicles — to those responsible for some of the most sickening assaults on innocent life since Bush destroyed Iraqi society and plunged it into sectarian warfare, which the Administration has encouraged and exacerbated at every step.

This is one way of keeping the American death count down: you just turn over various walled enclaves in Baghdad to a band of thugs in your pay, lard them with guns and money, then get the hell out of Dodge, letting the thugs do what they will. It is absolutely vital for the Washington warmongers to keep the American death count low. As long as "only" two or three Americans are being killed every day or so, they can keep a lid on the rising but still very manageable popular discontent with the war back home. The increased use of airpower — blunderbuss assaults on civilian areas with bombs and attack helicopters — also helps toward this goal. And, as noted, it also helps lower the official numbers on "terrorist" violence, following the age-old tradition of U.S. foreign policy: if somebody is killing, raping and torturing with our money, in our name, why then, it can't be terrorism. It's just a grassroots initiative to restore law and order, and bring freedom to benighted peoples.

The American policy also borrows directly from the methods adopted by Vladimir Putin in Chechnya. After directing a savage and unrelenting assault on the Chechen people — complete with widespread torture, collective punishment, kidnappings and murder — Putin then bought off some of the most brutal figures in the opposition and installed them in power. Given this example, it would not be surprising if the "strongman" who eventually emerges to take over Iraq — in the name of some sort of "national emergency council" ruling by decree and supported, implicitly or openly, by the United States — comes not from the old circle of Western-backed exiles nor from the Iranian-backed parties that Bush has empowered in the present government, but from one of the street-level gangs now being built up by the Americans.

more...

http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/content/view/2808/81/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is this a reliable source? Because it paints a somewhat different
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 05:15 PM by wienerdoggie
picture than other recent Iraq reports, and is more grim--I have no idea who to believe anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Besides being a great writer, I think Floyd is very reliable.
He has lots of contacts all over, and has been telling it like it is for years. I salivate when I see he's written something new. And yes, he's depressing as all hell, but he has no reason to sugarcoat anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks--I read his bio, and it sounds impressive, but I'm just not
familiar with him or with Atlantic Free Press--I'll take your word for it. This is worlds away from the optimism that an article today from the BBC laid out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Take it to the bank, wienerdoggie.
Floyd is as good as gold.

Everyone I know who is experienced in counter-insurgency sees it the same way.

Think about it...

Circumstances were increasingly spinning out of control, we toss 30K more troops into the mix, and we are expected to believe that the Evildoers just threw in the fucking towel?

Hell no, we told them that if they would kindly quit killing so many of our people that they could just jack the shit out of one another to their hearts' content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Sunni cooperation started BEFORE the surge
This is also conveniently forgotten by the "surge is working crowd." The Sunni extremists figured out that it would be a lot easier to recapture Sunni supremacy in Iraq if they let the Americans arm, train and support them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Correct
I truly believe there would have been no "surge" if the Sunnis had not been co-opted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. If Al Q in Iraq is destroyed what could happen afterward?
Will the Sunni Insurgencies stop attacking Shiites, the US Troops, other foreign Troops, &/or the
Iraqi Govt. forces?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Al Q in Iraq is just a bunch of thugs.
We gave them that name and they just started using it.

They have no more connect with the Mullah Omar/ Bin Laden Al Q than they do with the Southern Baptist Convention.

Getting rid of them is much like trying to rid Los Angeles of the Crips and Bloods.

There will be fighting for as long as there are any occupying forces in the ME. And there will be fighting after that, for we will let one of the thugs take over as de facto leader and he will probably try to go Hussein on the people. Trouble is, the people know that they can mix it up with just about anyone now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC