Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Helen Dares to Question WH about Civilian Casualties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 09:03 AM
Original message
Helen Dares to Question WH about Civilian Casualties
Perino responds by lecturing her, even challenging her position in the room-

Q Why should we depend on him?

MS. PERINO: Because he is the commander on the ground, Helen. He's the one who is making sure that the situation is moving —

Q You mean how many more people we kill?

MS. PERINO: Helen, I find it really unfortunate that you use your front row position, bestowed upon you by your colleagues, to make such statements. This is a — it is an honor and a privilege to be in the briefing room, and to suggest that we, at the United States, are killing innocent people is just absurd and very offensive.

Q Do you know how many we have since the start of this war?

MS. PERINO: How many — we are going after the enemy, Helen. To the extent that any innocent Iraqis have been killed, we have expressed regret for it.

Q Oh, regret. It doesn't bring back a life.


MS. PERINO: Helen, we are in a war zone, and our military works extremely hard to make sure that everyone has the opportunity for liberty and freedom and democracy, and that is exactly what they are doing.

I'm going to move on.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N2JmNzQ3MmI5NzM1NDcwOGY1OWFjM2EwNTI4ZTk5NWM=



I guess you have to be a male prostitute to get any respect in an administration press briefing. -Or a government plant. That works, too.

Take your worthless "regret" shove it, Dana.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Helen Thomas is my hero!
She has more balls than the fellows in that press room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. ol Dana was practically in tears on that one
Helen rulz, Dana droolz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Helen should have brought up how we invaded illegally based on WH lies.
No stated reason by the White House for invading Iraq has ever held up.


(No way could Saddam have flown all four planes on 9/11, as he did not have a valid pilots license.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. She has, repeatedly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. No shit. And she's spoken and written about it, too.
...for years.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/132700_thomas29.html
Tuesday, July 29, 2003
snip>
WASHINGTON -- President Bush has a huge credibility gap stemming from his exaggerated rhetoric that led the United States to attack Iraq.....

To rally public support for an unprovoked U.S. invasion of Iraq, Bush laid it on with a shovel. There were scary warnings of an imminent, direct threat that Saddam Hussein would use nuclear, biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction against us.

Throughout the buildup for war, Bush and his aides repeatedly claimed that there was a link between Iraq and the al-Qaida terrorists.

So far, after almost four months of U.S. occupation of Iraq, none of those contentions has panned out.

The Iraqis deployed none of those feared weapons when U.S. forces invaded on March 20, despite warnings that had led many U.S. military men and women to spend uncomfortable hours decked out in protective moon suits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That 80+ year old woman has more guts in her than the rest of the WH Press Corps combined.
She pretty much made me the policial wonk I am when I was a pre-adolescent when she asked Ziegler the question that felled the Nixon administration.

If only we had 5 more like her. To my mind, only David Schuster approaches her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Get her Helen! stupid little... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. it is an honor and a privilege to be in the briefing room
No, my dear Dana. It is our RIGHT to be informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. How dare that emaciated talking Barbie speak to the esteemed
Helen Thomas that way?

Tried to find video, so far no luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. You can find a link to the video and a transcript of the press
briefing on this page:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/11/20071130-5.html#

It's about 17:15 into the video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thank you! It's early here--of course it would be on WH page.
Must. Get. Caffeine! :rofl:

Thanks again; I never tire of watching Helen smack 'em down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. Translation: ShutUP or we'll take your seat away. What a worthless WHslut n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC