Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mobile Labs to Target Iraqis for Death

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 03:53 PM
Original message
Mobile Labs to Target Iraqis for Death
Mobile Labs to Target Iraqis for Death

By Robert Parry
December 13, 2007


U.S. forces in Iraq soon will be equipped with high-tech equipment that will let them process an Iraqi’s biometric data in minutes and help American soldiers decide whether they should execute the person or not, according to its inventor.

"A war fighter needs to know one of three things: Do I let him go? Keep him? Or shoot him on the spot?” Pentagon weapons designer Anh Duong told the Washington Post for a feature on how this 47-year-old former Vietnamese refugee and mother of four rose to become a top U.S. bomb-maker.

Though Duong is best known for designing high-explosives used to destroy hardened targets, she also supervised the Joint Expeditionary Forensics Facilities project, known as a “lab in a box” for analyzing biometric data, such as iris scans and fingerprints, that have been collected on more than one million Iraqis.

The labs – collapsible, 20-by-20-foot units each with a generator and a satellite link to a biometric data base in West Virginia – will let U.S. forces cross-check data in the field against information collected previously that can be used to identify insurgents. These labs are expected to be deployed across Iraq in early 2008.

Duong said the next step will be to shrink the lab to the size of a “backpack” so soldiers who encounter a suspect “could find out within minutes” if he’s on a terrorist watch list and should be killed.

Duong justified this biometric-data program as a humanitarian way of singling out “bad guys” for elimination while sparing innocent civilians.

more at:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2007/121307.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CT_Progressive Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. There is a typo in there. It should read "And should be ARRESTED."
WTF is this "should be killed" bullshit? Doesn't this idiot know US Law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is this for real? :-o
Someone please tell me it's satire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Anh Duong is the darling of the Military Channel.
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 04:05 PM by Kutjara
Whenever I have insomnia and flick through the higher reaches of the tv listings, there always seems to be some "documentary" on the Military Channel featuring her. She's all about the fuel-air bombs, the bunker busters, the sort-of-almost-but-not-quite-nukes. The woman still views the world like a terrified child cowering in the smoking ruins of her village in Vietnam forty years ago. I think designing huge bombs is her way of taking power for that powerless child.

She also spouts the uber-patriotic party line at every opportunity, about how killing lots of people is necessary to preserve everyone's freedom, and how America has a duty to kill more people than anyone else. "Shooting on the spot," is no doubt her preferred way of dealing with things that trouble her and that she can't blow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. was she the woman in "Why we fight"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I didn't see that one, so I'm not sure.
But there's a better than even chance she's in anything about huge bombs. She also shows up with disturbing regularity in the "Futureweapons" series.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Maybe we should have shot her "on the spot".
This biometric claptrap will probably prove to be every bit as fail-safe as fingerprints as a sole source of proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. shooting on-the-spot is the rule of engagement! more from the article... "the KILL or CAPTURE list"


While the Americans kept their distance out of fear the suspect might be wearing a suicide vest, the man was questioned about his name and the Americans checked his description against a list from the Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force Afghanistan, known as “the kill-or-capture list.”

Concluding that the man was insurgent leader Nawab Buntangyar, Staffel gave the order to shoot, and Anderson – from a distance of about 100 yards away – fired a bullet through the man’s head, killing him instantly.


The soldiers viewed the killing as “a textbook example of a classified mission completed in accordance with the American rules of engagement,” the International Herald Tribune reported. “The men said such rules allowed them to kill Buntangyar, whom the American military had designated a terrorist cell leader, once they positively identified him.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC