|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Harper_is_Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 02:58 AM Original message |
Obama is your candidate? OK then, welcome to 4 years of President Huckabee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. Oh, Gawd. Not even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:03 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Deleted sub-thread |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
26. Edwards' analysis is correct. This election is about change, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:30 AM Response to Reply #26 |
86. Hillary would change lots of things. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #86 |
131. Yes, lots more change in the pockets of greedy corporations. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ingac70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
3. No way the corporate whores in the GOP.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
4. Highly doubtful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:07 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Well then 4 more years (at least) of rightwing government, WHOEVER it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ingac70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:09 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. He's certainly more apt to win than Hillary! n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. I disagree. I don't even like the guy, but I recognize that he can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. The raw numbers from Iowa are against you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Well, I wouldn't make too big a deal out of that alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:48 AM Response to Reply #18 |
30. Wow... reread what I posted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:54 AM Response to Reply #30 |
71. Do we know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:10 AM Response to Reply #71 |
80. That's tired already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #80 |
106. I don't trust the republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
82. yeah,,,and I bet you thought they wouldn't get 240000 to caucus in Iowa.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:09 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Obama vs MCain is a nightmare race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:12 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Energy and optimism beat crankiness and bad ideas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Energy and optimism win when times are good... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:21 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. I dunno. If it were someone else, with the experience, perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:31 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. That is the wildcard in all this, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:36 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Oh yeah. And whether he can continue to do so in other states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:02 AM Response to Reply #17 |
36. um. democrats win on the economy- particularly when it's bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:29 AM Response to Reply #36 |
43. True, but economic bad times aren't the only bad times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:49 AM Response to Reply #43 |
55. when the economy is bad it invariably trumps ALL other issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:28 AM Response to Reply #55 |
68. I thought you were a bit of a Hillary supporter, Cali. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:23 AM Response to Reply #43 |
84. But hillary can't make an issue of Iraq--she voted for it! Also, give Obama a good VP... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #17 |
102. No, good times are when bullshit wedge issues and "guy you can have a beer with" wins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ingac70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Funny thing though... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:18 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. It'll be a hard sell after them broken bones. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:58 AM Response to Reply #8 |
72. Do you think he can beat Rudy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:21 AM Response to Reply #8 |
83. I disagree. Hillary also would not have as much experience as McCain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:25 AM Response to Reply #4 |
24. Looks are in the eye of the Beholder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:38 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. A "reassuring look"? Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:44 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. You're not reassured by his calm, patient manner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-06-08 12:36 AM Response to Reply #29 |
132. *snort* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:05 AM Response to Original message |
5. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:10 AM Response to Original message |
9. Just curious, what is your reasoning behind this statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:14 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Obama is unelectable. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:17 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. That's not reasoning. That is an opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:19 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Good luck with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:24 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Let me get this straight. This guy from CANADA is telling us who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:04 AM Response to Reply #23 |
75. The fact that he cannot even give reasoned answers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caretha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:58 AM Response to Reply #75 |
89. And all the other threads he has posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GirlinContempt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:04 AM Response to Reply #23 |
76. Just because he's stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #76 |
118. They can have all the opinions they want, but we know our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GirlinContempt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #118 |
121. Well then you're doing Canadians a disservice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:48 AM Response to Reply #16 |
31. Tell that to the masses of American Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:52 AM Response to Reply #16 |
33. For what reasons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:32 AM Response to Reply #16 |
44. Bullshit, bullshit and bullshit. (It bears repeating, because you keep hammering away at Obama.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:21 AM Original message |
Can you give a more thought out analysis of why you feel this way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #16 |
105. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:01 AM Response to Reply #9 |
74. Huckabee is way more openly religious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:11 AM Response to Original message |
13. he was able to get a huge number of new voters out, he matched young voters with seniors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:49 AM Response to Original message |
32. How dare you say that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:58 AM Response to Original message |
34. ignorance is not something to be proud of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:01 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. You can, too, be proud of ignorance--just be loud and confident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:07 AM Response to Reply #34 |
78. Huck isn't going to be the candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naturyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:06 AM Response to Original message |
37. Obama will NOT be my candidate until he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:10 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Link, please? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naturyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:13 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Right here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:24 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Show me where he "praises Reagan's approach to welfare." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naturyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:40 AM Response to Reply #41 |
48. Um... I've been on SSI for 8 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #48 |
112. Complaints are not the same thing as approach. And you cannot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:14 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. "puts down the crack pipe"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naturyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:36 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Ugh... I always say "put down the crack pipe" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:38 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Get used to it...it's their new tactic as discussed on ObamaGirl.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naturyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:42 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Kucinich says to support Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:44 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. He asked people to support Obama in Iowa if he did not become viable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naturyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:54 AM Response to Reply #50 |
57. Yeah, thats what I wasn't getting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:02 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. He also was very snippy with Thom Hartmann |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naturyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:14 AM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Well, I kind of agree Kucinich belongs in the Green party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:17 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. It's a shame, I wish the 30% that supported Edwards would help form a Progressive Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:36 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. He did provide a quote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:46 AM Response to Reply #46 |
52. no he didn't. that quote has no attribution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:48 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Source: THE AUDACITY OF HOPE: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream by BARACK OBAMA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:51 AM Response to Reply #54 |
56. I've read the book. I don't recall the quote, but the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:58 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Don't particularly care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naturyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:11 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Bingo. It's not something a progressive says. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:13 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. I'm just so tired of it. And people go along with it like it's ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naturyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:18 AM Response to Reply #62 |
66. That's not a bad idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:28 AM Response to Original message |
42. Hucky is gonna take New York? California? Illinois? Minnesota? New Jersey? Oregon? Washington? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:45 AM Response to Original message |
51. I'm still thinking Guiliani is going to sneak in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:46 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Your man chose to support her.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:41 AM Response to Reply #53 |
69. I know, I lament it often. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:06 AM Response to Reply #51 |
77. Hell no, Rudy is toasted like a marshmellow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:15 AM Response to Reply #77 |
81. We'll see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
weeve (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
58. Actually ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pointsoflight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:17 AM Response to Original message |
65. You're dead wrong in at least two ways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:21 AM Response to Original message |
67. Stupidest thing I've ever heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:49 AM Response to Original message |
70. Why don't you keep this stuff in GD:P where sane people can ignore it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 05:58 AM Response to Original message |
73. Funniest DU post I've seen in years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:08 AM Response to Reply #73 |
79. Ignore Huckster at your own peril |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevinbgoode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:24 AM Response to Original message |
85. I don't believe that at all. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
87. Aw, shucks, did someone else sit on your inevitable throne? Pity that. Not. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harper_is_Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-06-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #87 |
133. Not at all. I'm not a Clinton booster. Just wise enough to recognize the US is not ready for a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voltaire99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
88. So what? We're free to vote as we like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 08:27 AM Response to Reply #88 |
92. It's our country too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
90. Huckabee would be the best candidate for us if Obama is the nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
91. again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
93. There is absolutely *no way* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:17 AM Response to Reply #93 |
96. philandering? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeStateDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
94. The reality of demographics would prove you prophetic. The only way the pukes win is if we do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
95. I've Marked Your Words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
97. You are wrong. Mark My Words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
98. Huckabee polls so low nationally that he may very well not win the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
99. naw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
100. Y ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
101. I disagree....I think that if Hillary gets the nod, that President Huckabee or McCain, Giuliani etc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scriptor Ignotus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
103. yea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
104. man you sure are anti-Obama first with the black man can' be elected crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. he also has a global warming slam on Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
108. Thank you mr. DU Poster I was about to make a big mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
109. You're so obviously not a progressive AT ALL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
110. Subtext: On accounta he's a nee-grow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
111. the Republican establishment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
113. Or President McCain, Romney, etc. (Not sure Huckabee will get nod.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
114. Oh, and Edwards has a really big House... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #114 |
122. HIB's agenda is obviously racist and counter to what Democrats want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #122 |
125. given how HIB has an MO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
115. Oh, piss off. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
116. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
117. Out of all the candidates, polls show Edwards as the most likely to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
951-Riverside (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
119. Harper_is_Bush I take it you are voting for Huckabee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #119 |
124. I'm amazed at how many of the reactions here have been nothing more than knee-jerking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #124 |
126. if the thread were alone - perhaps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
120. No Truer Words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
123. I absolutely agree with this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kid a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
127. the most idiotic thing i've seen today...and i've been on GD all morning!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
128. what a bitter little man... Sorry the sHill has failed you. Choose an honest candidate next time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
129. Nonsense, I would work my arse off and scratch others' eyes out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
130. This is true. You and I will be part of the "told you so" gang. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-06-08 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
134. Sorry to say I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC