Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jesselyn Radack: A blacklist's real face

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:59 AM
Original message
Jesselyn Radack: A blacklist's real face
http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1171620175651

TARGETING LAWYERS
A blacklist's real face

Jesselyn Radack/Special to The National Law Journal
February 19, 2007

I was not surprised to read that the Pentagon's former deputy assistant secretary, Charles D. Stimson, attacked law firms for representing Guantánamo Bay detainees. (The furor over his remarks resulted in his resignation on Feb. 2.) For years, the government has been trying to control attorneys acting on behalf of terrorism suspects and, if it cannot control them, then to punish them. I speak from experience.

I am the very real face of what the Pentagon's admonition looks like in practice, and I did not even represent an alleged terrorist-I merely gave the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) advice seen as favorable to one. I was the DOJ ethics adviser in the case of the so-called "American Taliban," John Walker Lindh. On Dec. 7, 2001, I received a call from a Criminal Division attorney who wanted to know about the ethical propriety of interrogating Lindh without a lawyer being present. I was told unambiguously that Lindh's father had retained counsel for his son.

I advised that, under the anti-contact rule, Lindh should not be questioned without his lawyer. That was on a Friday. Over the weekend, the FBI interviewed him anyway. At that point, I advised that the interview may need to be sealed and used only for intelligence-gathering or national security purposes, not criminal prosecution. Again, my advice was ignored.

Three weeks later, former Attorney General John Ashcroft announced that a criminal complaint had been filed against Lindh. "The subject here is entitled to choose his own lawyer," he said, "and to our knowledge, has not chosen a lawyer at this time." I knew that wasn't true. Three weeks later, Ashcroft announced Lindh's indictment, saying his rights "have been carefully, scrupulously honored." Again, I knew that wasn't true...

Continued...
http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1171620175651

Jesselyn Radack is the author of The Canary in the Coalmine: Blowing the Whistle in the Case of "American Taliban" John Walker Lindh (2006), available at http://patriotictruthteller.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC