Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Design Flaw Said to Have Caused Minn. Bridge to Collapse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:43 AM
Original message
Design Flaw Said to Have Caused Minn. Bridge to Collapse
Design Flaw Said to Have Caused Minn. Bridge to Collapse
By Del Quentin Wilber and Michael Laris
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, January 15, 2008; Page A03


A design flaw caused a Minnesota bridge to collapse last summer, killing 13 people and injuring 100 in an accident that focused renewed attention on the safety of the nation's highways and bridges, according to federal sources familiar with the investigation.

The National Transportation Safety Board is expected to announce today that investigators have traced the failure to steel structures known as gusset plates that held together beams on the Minneapolis bridge, according to sources who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the board's findings.

Some gusset plates on the bridge, which carried eight-lane Interstate 35W across the Mississippi River, snapped during evening rush hour on Aug. 1, leading the bridge to crumple, according to the sources.

Gusset plates are common on steel bridges across the nation, including in the Washington area. They hold together angled beams on the bridge's frame.

The sources said the fault in the Minneapolis span stemmed from the bridge's design and would not have been discovered during detailed state inspections.

When the bridge was built in the 1960s, its gusset plates were not thick nor strong enough to meet safety margins of the era, the sources said. Over decades, renovations added weight to the span. It was undergoing a construction project with heavy equipment and material at the time of the collapse.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/14/AR2008011402782.html?wpisrc=rss_nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. MN needs a written apology from that
DoT bitch.

Apparently bike and pedestrian facilities were not the culprit.

Let me be the first to wish the US DoT a big Fuck You!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why are tests during construction not standard procedures?
"During the construction projects, the sources said, state officials and contractors did not recalculate how extra weight might affect the gusset plates. They said it was not standard procedure to do such studies."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. How convenient to scapegoat some designer from 50 years ago...
The Star Tribune did an expose a while ago where the contractor hired to do the inspections ran computer simulations that predicted a collapse. The contractor said the bridge must be reinforced ASAP... until someone in Mn/DOT leaned on them to change their story. Closing the bridge for repairs or replacement just wasn't politically expedient.

Maybe it was a design flaw, but what happened in the decades that followed is certainly relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks. I agree, now it's nobody's fault, is it. Typical. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is a Republican administration and Governor coordinating
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 10:05 AM by higher class
a strategy. A design flaw, indeed. It was something that they knew about - it wasn't hidden. Following design and construction you have inspections and repairs. They knew there was a problem. It was studied and analyzed and timetables were known. A Republican Governor didn't want to do it. They postponed it. Plain and simple.

They believe we are fools to think that the design called for never having to watch after it and maintain it or correct anything. They expect us to believe that knowledge and materials of 50 years don't have to be checked and retrofitted.

Don't be misled. Nothing in that announcement exonderates those responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC