Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did christian broadcaster (Paxson Com. aka ION) charter plane to Saudi's after 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:51 AM
Original message
Why did christian broadcaster (Paxson Com. aka ION) charter plane to Saudi's after 9/11
and was John McCain on that plane the year before?

(NOT 9/11 CONSPIRACY)

As per the official 9/11 commission report, the Saudi's were give permission to leave the US on charter flights while the rest of US airspace was closed. The second plane, leaving Las Vegas carried a Saudi Prince and his party on September 20th 2001. This plane, has been identified in the report as Chartered Flight B 727-21, Tail Number N727PX. This plane is a private Boeing 727 owned by Paxson Communication a.k.a. ION Broadcasting.

Paxson Communications (as it was known during the time period concerned) owned this plane; a private corporate jet. Curiously, this tail (N-number) ID does not exist, and is available according to the FAA.

Chartered Flight B 727-21, Tail Number N727PX
On September 20, 2001, 18 members of the party of Saudi Prince Abdulmajeed Bin
Abdulaziz departed from Las Vegas, Nevada, for Stanstead, England.84 They
underwent the same vetting process as the 69 people on the flight the day before.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/staff_statements/911_TerrTrav_App.pdf

Now, the question is, was John McCain given access to this plane through his relationship (professional or otherwise) with lobbyist Vicki Iseman?

If anyone has a picture of John McCain debarking or embarking from a plane with this tail number (N727PX) please post.



This will torpedo McCain and propel the Democrat into office with the greatest of ease!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 11:57 AM by libnnc
Why does John McCain have ties to a company that aided the escape of the Saudi Royal family after 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. come on peoples...this are hawt stuff
Why does uber-super-duper-patriot-type-hero-candidate John McCain have ties to a company that aided in the escape of the SAUDI ROYAL FAMILY AFTER 9/11

AND HOW MANY OF THE HIJACKERS WERE SAUDIS AGAIN?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks for connecting the dots. I'm getting so blurry-eyed with all
the evidence, sometimes it feels like I'm waiting for a blue dress with a stain on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Intriguing indeed. You'll have to be patient though. This is the
sort of nugget that people want to have a closer look at for themselves before responding. Unfortunately, I don't have time right now or I would be launching my own full-blown investigation into this.

Hopefully you've lit a fire under a couple of our more prolific investigators here who will chime in as soon as they've rolled this ball around a bit. Octafish anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No Octafish necessary (though I love him dearly)
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 12:20 PM by libnnc
This is plain old PR nightmare stuff.


"But mommy, I thought John McCain would keep us safe from the terraissts -- why is he friends with the people who helped them???"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. See I think GW Bush and GHW Bush and Cheney etc.
have desensitized the US public from being outraged at the close relationships the Rethugs have with the Saudis. People already KNOW about it and have clearly said, no big deal.

I think it's a big deal because it demonstrates that McCain is clearly co-opted into the players club - the movers and shakers that manipulate global events for their profit. This is right up Octafish's alley for sure.

I think the possibility of Paxson being a CIA front also has interesting possibilities which would be exposed by being the corporate jet of choice to ferry out the Saudis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Outrage fatique
I recc'ed this thread but frankly, it just isn't news here on DU that upper echelon Rethugs knew about/colluded with 9-11 and global players like the Saudis, imho. McCain being tied into BFEE and Halliburton's plans doesn't really shock me. That uber "Christian" (sic) organizations like Paxson are also in on the whole manipulation scheme by corporate interests also meshes with Bush's Christianity meme. There have been other DU links outlining how mega-Christian dynastic empires like Billy Graham's are really just political front operations for the Rethugs.

This plane does tie all of that up into one neat little nugget that SHOULD get big time coverage but I wouldn't bet the farm on it.

Sigh. So while I appreciate more evidence of the disgusting corruption and treasonous actions by our elected officials and their corporate pimps, I guess today, I'm just beyond getting worked up.

Anyway, a kick for good measure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Smells like
Another covert CIA vehicle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ok, let's start with the plane itself and see where it leads...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Classic Designs of Tampa Bay, Inc.
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 12:29 PM by Texas Explorer
Anyone familiar with this company? N727PX may have been previously registered to this company, according to Airliners.net.

In the most recent photos, the plane is completely white with no markings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. This is from the blog of a 787 maiden flight passenger in Nov. 2005
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 12:52 PM by ingin
James Wallace is the aerospace reporter for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

Boeing had hoped to get a Boeing Business Jet to take us to the various factories. None was available so the company chartered the 727-100 from a company called Bell-Air. The company is based in California, but their plane is usually kept at Paine Field in Everett. The jet, with its posh interior that includes a state room, bed and shower, is usually used to transport royalty from the Middle East around the United States when they visit this country. And transport them in privacy.

Our 727 was painted white, with the only identifying markings, N727PX, on one of the engines.

http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/104658.asp

Note: California based Bell-Air, owner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Bell-Air is a charter brokerage, not owner.
http://www.bellairaviation.com/

8018 E Santa Ana Canyon Rd Suite 100, Box 346 Anaheim Hills, CA 92808

Tel: (951) 735-4339 Fax: (951) 371-5128 nevell@bellairaviation.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. White planes...
Well, the "black helicopter" crowd didn't get it quite right...

An unmarked white plane makes me wonder if it's a rendition flight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. A Completely Blank Plane is a Bit Unusual
If the plane is owned by a business, the business usually want's its name on the plane. It's free advertising.

That one doesn't even appear to have any numbers on it. No civilian entity could get away with that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Color me surprised...
"We learned that the plane is registered in Clearwater, FL. to “CLASSIC DESIGNS OF TAMPA BAY INC,” owned by Lowell W. Paxson, one of the founders of Home Shopping Network, as well as the founder of Christian broadcast network PAX-TV..."

http://www.madcowprod.com/07312007.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. I'm familiar with that Airline.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
35. Nice research subthread suggestion.
I wish more people on DU would do what you did here. We need to learn to compartmentalize our efforts per thread, and do it more often.

Nice job. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. KICKED for later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Second the motion.
v
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Paxson is McCain's guy -- he's probably traveling on that same plane a number of times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Like he did on Keating's as well. He only discovered later that it was a CLEAR ethics violation
and he didn't think Keating was trying to influence him. :eyes:

He really says that in his book.

He's too corrupt, hawkish, but most of all--too STUPID to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick and Booked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. The McCain/Iseman Connection Is Deep Indeed
I suspect a lot of digging is going on now on Ms. Iseman's client list and the favors they gained from both their association with Iseman and McCain's "muscle". Broadcasters were able to expand their monopolies, telcoms got special deal on public airwaves and billions were made...the McCain/Iseman Connection was well worth the cost of doing business...be it lending the corporate jet, throwing a massive junket or parties, doing favorable PR pieces or other "considerations" that kept McCain happy.

Hopefully we can also find out Ms. Iseman's ties to the K-Street project...and to other Congresscritters and Senators. If nothing else than to keep this money on the sideline this year as the various companies attempt to cover their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'd take you more seriously if you didn't use apostrophes for plurals
I'm intrigued by the story, but the damned apostrophe takes away from your credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'm sure someone could say the same of you
Your use of profanity compromises your criticism of the grammar error in the OP.

:eyes:

Come on...please :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. lol
:rofl: 's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Thank you for trashing my piece with your red marker professer?
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

It's the Apostrophe Conspiracy! To the dungon with me!

small note: it's called a spellcheck with no grammatic context!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Oh come ON! You're shooting the messenger with that comment.
Let's focus on the STORY.

BHN


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. I am interested in the story. But apostrophes for plurals....
It's just a real problem for me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
29. K & R
bookmarked as well for later memory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. Interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. Good question.... was he?
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 11:09 PM by althecat
"Now, the question is, was John McCain given access to this plane through his relationship (professional or otherwise) with lobbyist Vicki Iseman?"

Is this a rhetorical question or one we do not know the answer to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. I'm hoping to find indisputable proof.
Photographic would be preferred, documents would suffice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
32. Thanks for the PDF link. Fascinating stuff.
Strange to read that the FBI actually conducted some interviews with the Saudis while sitting in cars. Sounds real in depth.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
33. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC