Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Telecoms- they are "BELIEVED" to have "assisted...after 9/11 attacks"???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:01 AM
Original message
Telecoms- they are "BELIEVED" to have "assisted...after 9/11 attacks"???
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 11:02 AM by underpants
VIDEO at the link below

BUSH: Second, the House bill fails to provide liability protection to companies believed to have assisted in protecting and assisting our nation after 9/11 attacks. Instead, the House bill would make matters even worse by allowing litigation to continue for years. In fact, House leaders simply adopted the position that class action trial lawyers are taking in the multi-billion dollar lawsuits they have filed.

This litigation would undermine the private sector’s willingness to cooperate with the intelligence community. Cooperation that is absolutely essential to protecting our country from harm. This litigation would require the disclosure of state secrets that could lead to the public release of highly classified information that our enemies could use against us. and this litigation would be unfair.

Because any companies that assisted us after 9/11 were assured by our government that their cooperation was legal and necessary. Companies that may have helped us save lives should be thanked for their patriotic service, not subjected to billion-dollar lawsuits that would make them less willing to help in the future.

The House bill may be good for class action trial lawyers, but it would be terrible for the United States.
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/13/bush-thank-telecoms/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. What about helping BEFORE 9/11?

That's the real issue.

The House should change the bill - give them immunity for activity between 9/11 and end of 2007 only. See how B**h likes that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly.
And that is the truth that this criminal wantst to keep his from the public. We have a right to know. Our Representatives should investigate and impeach if found to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC