Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sept. 1-4: Students for a Democratic Society Want You to Participate in Shutting Down the RNC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 07:54 AM
Original message
Sept. 1-4: Students for a Democratic Society Want You to Participate in Shutting Down the RNC
SDS Call to Action: Endorse and Participate in Shutting Down the RNC
Friday, March 28 2008 @ 01:09 PM PDT
Contributed by: activate
Views: 968


Over the past year, organizing against the 2008 Republican National Convention (RNC)--which will take place from September 1 through 4 in St. Paul--has grown at a considerable pace. At our 2007 national convention, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) passed a proposal endorsing the work of groups organizing against the RNC and encouraging folks within SDS to organize against both the RNC and the DNC.



SDS Call to Action: Endorse and Participate in Shutting Down the RNC

Over the past year, organizing against the 2008 Republican National Convention (RNC)--which will take place from September 1 through 4 in St. Paul--has grown at a considerable pace. At our 2007 national convention, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) passed a proposal endorsing the work of groups organizing against the RNC and encouraging folks within SDS to organize against both the RNC and the DNC.

Since that time, ACTIVATE (Grand Rapids SDS) has grown increasingly excited about the prospect of achieving a significant victory at the RNC and thereby giving our movement a much needed influx of new energy, tactics, and experiences. Across the country, groups have been talking--and talking seriously--about shutting down the RNC via one of the largest direct action protests in years. The RNC is shaping up to be an event that we won't want to miss.

For SDS, the call to shutdown the RNC offers a tremendous opportunity to plug into what will likely be a major mobilization. Under the direct action strategy being discussed, SDS chapters can participate in this shutdown by selecting and utilizing the tactics with which they are most comfortable. The direct action framework will allow SDS chapters to work with those engaging in similar tactics, both within and outside SDS. Finally, chapters are free to theme their actions how they see fit and there could conceivably be SDS actions highlighting everything from the occupation of Iraq to the rising cost of tuition. Regardless of the themes and tactics chosen, imagine the excitement that we would all feel if SDS held down a few intersections and played a key role in shutting down the RNC...

To that end, we are calling on SDS chapters to both endorse and participate in a three-tiered system for disrupting the RNC on its opening day. At a gathering of over 100 anti-authoritarians from around the country in August of 2007 (facilitated by the Twin Cities based RNC Welcoming Committee), the following direct action strategy was adopted to shut down the RNC:

"Tier 1: Blockade the Xcel Center - Establish 15-20 blockades utilizing a diversity of tactics, creating inner and outer rings around St. Paul's Xcel Center.

Tier 2: Immobilize Delegates' Transportation - Immobilize the delegates' transportation infrastructure, including buses, bus depots, etc.

Tier 3: Block Connecting Bridges - Block the five western bridges connecting the cities.

Those plugging into this strategy will be free to shape their actions as they see fit, using the tactics they consider appropriate. As the specific blockade sites are established, some sites may be designated "red zones" (prepared for self-defense), "yellow zones" (peaceful but assertive), and "green zones" (no risk of arrest) so as to accommodate a wide variety of creative tactics. The RNC Welcoming Committee is currently considering these zones and laying out specific blockade sites. Once these details are finalized they will be made public, and locals will be available to provide specific information and pictures of intersections, bridges, and other relevant locations to people that would like them."

We are calling on SDS chapters to endorse this strategy and to begin planning how they will fit into this strategy--if they chose to participate--by familiarizing themselves with the Twin Cities and building their skill set by hosting direct action trainings, skill shares, and thinking strategically about how their chapter can be involved in shutting down the RNC.

Finally, we are encouraging SDS chapters to act in solidarity with calls put forth by the RNC Welcoming Committee and Unconventional Action by undertaking actions in the lead-up to the convention against the electoral process, the RNC/DNC, and individual candidates. These actions should be used to build the skills, relationships, and solidarity that will allow our movement to both successfully shutdown the RNC and grow beyond the RNC protests.

To endorse the direct action strategy, please send an email to centralnc@unconventionalaction.org

To endorse this call to action, please send an email to sds@activategr.org

For more on organizing against the RNC, visit:

http://www.nornc.org http://www.unconventionalaction.org

Finally, an updated list of endorsers will be available at:

http://www.activategr.org/organizing/rnc-dnc/sds-rnc-call/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. What in the world?
Is this really the best way to fight the good fight? Shut down the opposing convention?

This is really juvenile and counter-productive. All sides to a debate or to the political process have the right to their views and their own convention. You combat the opponent with ideas and words. You don't try to shut down opposing voices.

I dare say DU'ers would be none too happy if Repub groups were organizing plans to shut down the Dem convention. The end does not justify the means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Democrats want to shut down their rivals? Oh the irony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually, I don't think SDS is party affiliated......
..... from the website, they plan to disrupt both conventions.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not part of the Democratic Party. They've been around since the Sixties.
A little knowledge really goes well with smart-alecism. Try it next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. No -- national sds was RELAUNCHED MLK Day 2006
There is only minimal continuity between the old sds and the new, other than not just the name but the concept (a multitendency progressive anti-imperialist movement at least starting out centering on bases on campuses); my good friend for 20+ years, Al Haber, main founder of the original sds (who originally recruited Tom Hayden to sds), is active in sds today. Mike Albert, of Z magazine [HIGHLY recommended for those who like media alternative to the MSM, a mag that includes lots of original stuff by Chomsky and his close colleagues) also influential in the new sds, was a significant figure in MIT sds in the late 60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does anyone recall what percentage of demonstaters were "Agents Provocateurs" in Chicago '68?
Edited on Sat Apr-05-08 10:04 AM by L. Coyote
Wasn't it over 50%, the 50% that agitated for and started the violence.

FIRST< check to see if the people doing this are wearing matching jack boots and brown shirts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Actually Chicago 68 was a police riot, one that went on and on, day after day ...
The issue of blaming agents-provocateurs (hard to estimate number or %) when the PROVOCATION of the police was really not the issue is misleading at best, pulled out of one's ass at worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC