Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the Libby jury well hung?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:36 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is the Libby jury well hung?
Edited on Sat Mar-03-07 08:38 PM by originalpckelly
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. WTH is taking them so long???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They're having fun making paper airplanes out of the giant post-it pads.
Or maybe...wello we won't talk about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Maybe they found him guilty on all counts days ago, they just wanna make it look good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They are being meticulous and thorough
(but I think they're getting close, say Tuesday - ish)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. She bangs!
Sorry - the William Hung thing was too juicy not to vote for. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. For a blind chick justice sure is good in bed.
Edited on Sat Mar-03-07 08:43 PM by originalpckelly
:spank:

Seriously, big time :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Hey - being blind actually MIGHT make her BETTER in bed.
She has to feel around for everything.

:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. How did you know she was into S & M?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't care to check
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. I voted No, but I will change that vote if nothing comes by Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think you forgot to put the commas around the word 'well'...
:spray:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Brand New World Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. I voted yes due to the fact that I'm sure there is at least one
BushBot on the jury and there is absolutely no talking sense to those idiots. This is taking too long otherwise IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. I've served on juries; I have no idea what's going on
It isn't likely that they are acquitting him. As on DUer pointed out the other day, they are asking questions as to what reasonable doubt is, which means that that some believe he did it, but are just simply wondering if the prosecution proved it to the proper standard.

Based on what I heard of the trial itself and only, I would vot guilty. If a reasonable person got information from the Vice President of the United States (or the presumed Vice President, as the case may be) with instruction to use that information to smear and attack the reputation of a particular individual, he would remember it.

That was introduced into evidence and it was not contradicted. Libby should fry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC