Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

what does your BS meter say about Scotty tonight?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:44 PM
Original message
what does your BS meter say about Scotty tonight?
How do you feel about him and what he's saying? Is he sincere? Has he told the most important things he knows?

What does your gut say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. On a scale of 0 to 10 McClellan is still a 12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. meaning.....
...he's lying still?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. meaning that a snake can not change it's nature and Scott McClellan is a lying sack of shit
Edited on Thu May-29-08 11:45 PM by whistle
....and to answer the OP a bullshitter who bullshits the bullshitters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think some of his overall exposure to many inner working decisions
was not there. I do think the book is sincere in it's attempts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's at a 7
I think he knows worse things than he has revealed. But I give him credit for making a decent effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Maybe he knows enough to be able to keep Bush in check for 9 months.
He's untouchable (probably), and he's already shown that he is serious. That has to have BushCo shitting bricks.

If that's his plan, kudos to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Considering
the full out verbal assault on him from the administration I think they are shitting bricks so I give him kudos too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. My gut says he's an opportunist that told a little truth
He knows a BUNCH more. I obviously haven't read his book yet, but only based on the media reports and his interviews, he is telling us some things we already knew. He does seem to qualify and give a bit of cover for the Bush crowd, but he's giving us a little bit of truth. He released the book now, while Bush is still in office so that he could sell more books.

Do I believe him regarding the propaganda campaign, *'s authorization of the leak of classified info? yeah.
Do I trust him? nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. the fact that he's saying shit like he still admires and respects the fuckhead
HOW? WHY? HOW? WHY? HOW? WHY?????


something's off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. BS Meter Is Way Down
I think he's telling the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Indeed, he IS telling the truth, because he KNOWS no consequence will come of it as he is an insider
as is the REST of his family, and most importantly?
HE HAS A BOOK TO SELL TO A PISSED OFF PUBLIC.

None the less... nothing will come of it other
than increased revenues for him and his BFEE connected family.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm not going to turn on my BS meter for a week or two. Wexler...
Edited on Thu May-29-08 10:49 PM by Poll_Blind
...is trying to get him to speak before a committee, IIRC. I want to see where that's going before I'm even going to turn it on.

  My gut says "Wait...No reason to jump on this until you know more. Remember how Dan Rather got mouthfucked on the deal."

  I apologize. My gut is foul-mouthed and often blunt to the point of rudeness. But it sure has a point.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. what did he tell Fitz grand jury over Plame
don't see how if he told them the same thing he wrote, it would have turned out quite the way it did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. interesting point
If he told Fitz that Bush authorized Plame leak and Fitz didn't follow up. But we don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Or, he lied to the grand jury and just admitted it.
Either way, it seems like Fitz has to fire this thing back up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. that's kinda what i was thinking...
that he said, on olbermann, fuckhead said he authorized libby to leak plame's name (or did i misunderstand this)

i was STUNNED.

so...how does admitting that to the grand jury not lead farther down the road?? "he threw sand in my eyes" says fitz. WHATEVER! he wasn't even there when scottie did his talking!

sand? then use some visine and GET BACK TO WORK, FITZ!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. he was Brocked.
I think he's sincere, and he's telling the whole truth as he sees it.

David Brock went through a similar transformation some years ago, and has become one of the most respected media watchdogs in the country. I say we withhold judgement on McClennan for now and see how things evolve. I'm willing to give the guy a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. Here's what my BS meter is telling me
It's behaving in much the same way as it did when he was giving briefings.

So, I don't know how to interpret that, whether to think that he's deliberately lying, or that he's trying to cover up his own ignorance (that was my usual impression of him, that he was ashamed to consider that he might actually not be in the loop, and so he had to go out and try to fake it, only he didn't do it too well and it made him look like he was lying.)

I feel sort of the same way now about what he's saying, like there's something missing, something is not completely clicking for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Same here
He was evasive -- twitchy and nervous -- just like in briefings when he was obviously lying. When discussing Bush** especially, he was like a man who's stabbing someone for the first time and can't quite bring himself to cause more than a flesh wound, though it sometimes seemed he was fighting the urge to give the knife a good shove and twist.

That said, I still suspect he isn't on the up and up. His transformation isn't believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. i am saying what i have heard we already knew and bullshit that he is "surprised"
with his revelations.....

not buying it

cool enough it is out AGAIN, but not way jazzed since the stuff i am hearing was already out and visible and still the general public dont know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm warily supportive of him. After the interview with Keith, more supportive. But
Edited on Thu May-29-08 11:09 PM by UTUSN
while everything critical he's saying about Shrub is what most of us here have always known about Shrub, he appears to leave in all the caveats about how much "affection" he has for Shrub and how he doesn't believe that Shrub HIMSELF actually "lied" or did all of those nasty things on purpose, just from listening to other people. But in the Keith interview he said some damning things about Shrub.


So far only BROCK has totally overcome my suspicion of people who "switch".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. a TX wingnut just said on the radio:



*********QUOTE*******

It'll (the book) sell.

I think the "moment" for him was when he realized he was the patsy for Rove and Libby, that he was misled.

I also wonder how much of this is late score-settling for his mother, who ran up against the Bushie Republican party when she ran for Gov?

*********UNQUOTE*********
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. BS meter at about a 2.
My sense is that he was pretty much sincere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. Something funny is going on
I don't pretend to know what it is, but ole Scotty didn't just wake up one day and decide to hang the White House out to dry. The man was deeply complicit in all of their shenanigans, and had absolutely no moral qualms behind the podium. What, we are to believe he suddenly decided that maybe they were wrong? Further, are we to believe that the White House was unaware of the claims he was going to make, or that they knew in advance and did jack-all to stop him?

Bullshit. I want this to be just what it appears to be on it's face, a public about face from Scott. I don't buy it though, there has got to be more here than meets the eye. Maybe there was a betrayal behind closed doors and this is Scotty going public as vengeance, maybe it's all misdirection, maybe a lot of things. But I don't feel like the full truth is out there yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Solid observations and understandable caution. Thanks, TK. n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. My BS meter is flying off the charts
He's a spin meister. He's paid to make shit up for living. The sad fact is, we'll never know the extent of the damage of the crimes committed by BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. my gut says there is more here than he is saying
Edited on Thu May-29-08 11:24 PM by orleans
that there is A LOT more

and he was pissed/broken hearted as we all get whenever our idol who we worship and adore spurns us and falls from their pedestal.

on edit: (choir of angels sings for scottie's broken heart)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. I believe him but I don't understand how he could have thought that Bush was going to improve
Washington. I am amazed that so many people didn't get it during the election like we did. It was so clear that bush was not qualified to be president. The media was on his side before 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. The only new information I've heard so far
is about the set up photo on Air Force One showing Bush looking out the window. Apparently, Karl Rove came up with the idea and Bush wasn't even looking out on New Orleans at the time because the airplane was over Nevada. It was completely staged, but then Bush's entire Katrina disaster trip was one staged event after another, with firefighters taken out of service so they could pose with the chimpanzee and bulldozing equipment moved to sound stages where the chimpanzee could thump his chest and look important. The photo on Air Force One is something I didn't know about, but it's quite characteristic of the type of phoney charade that Rove would come up with and that Bush has been participating in his entire miserable life ever since his dress-up cheerleader days. The rest of the so-called revelations in the book haven't surprised me. McClellan is mainly a corroborating witness to evidence about the Bush administration we've known all along. The best thing to come out of the book, in my opinion, is McClellan's commentary about the pathetic way the press failed to challenge ChimpCo in the lead up to the war. If anyone can judge the effectiveness of the press in challenging the administration's policies, it's the press secretary who has to face those challenges. That critique of the media and the debate it has stirred alone makes the book worthwhile in my opinion.

As far as any material about Bush that McClellan might have held back, I'm sure there's tons of it, involving Bush's strange behavior in private. Bush I believe is quite mentally insane and maybe one day someone close to him will write a book about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
30. my BS meter says this is just another
scene in act III. We haven't revolted yet and that's exactly what the powers-that=be want; a revolt. The best plan of action is really just to make it to the inauguration and then demand change. Until then it'll either be insurrection followed by martial law or terror attack followed by martial law. If it's the latter, my money's on MIHOP V3.0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
31. He pulled his punches while in the clinches
He "doesn't know" why congress would want to subpoena him, or if we should worry about what Bush has been saying about Iraq.

If he's truly repentant, I suggest he get himself under oath.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
32. I Think He Sees The Writing On The Jail House Wall And Is
simply trying to cover his ass. And make a bit of money while doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC