Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Duffy: ‘White House Lawyers Are Concerned’ McClellan’s Book Will Reignite ‘The Valerie Plame Busines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 01:48 PM
Original message
Duffy: ‘White House Lawyers Are Concerned’ McClellan’s Book Will Reignite ‘The Valerie Plame Busines
In his explosive new memoir, former White House press secretary Scott McClellan claims that Karl Rove, Scooter Libby, “and possibly Vice President Cheney” encouraged him to “repeat a lie” to the American people about the administration’s role in the leaking of Valerie Plame’s identity. This assertion, along with others, has led members of Congress, like House Oversight Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA), to again ask questions about the CIA leak scandal.

On NBC’s The Chris Matthews Show today, Time magazine assistant managing editor Michael Duffy said that the renewed attention to the scandal is causing White House lawyers to be “very concerned”:

DUFFY: White House lawyers are concerned, very concerned, now that Scott McClellan’s book has led Henry Waxman and John Conyers to take another look at the Valerie Plame business. There may be hearings. Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald may be called. Just another way in which a Democratic Congress might make a difference during the fall.

Watch it:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/08/duffy-waxman-plame/

Last week, Waxman sent a letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey, requesting that the Justice Department turn over FBI interviews of President Bush and Cheney that were conducted during the CIA leak scandal investigation. In the letter, Waxman cited “new revelations” from McClellan’s book, including the claim that “he President and Vice President directed me to go out there and exonerate Scooter Libby.”

Additionally, White House lawyers are likely “concerned” that CIA leak special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald indicated this week that he would be willing to testify before Congress about alleged efforts to push him off of politically sensitive cases like the leak scandal.

As Duffy said, this “could make things rough for everyone who was affiliated with the Plame affair.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. If they've done nothing wrong
they have nothing to worry about. That's what they tell me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. There's no better response than yours!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. When was the Valerie Plame matter extinquished?
Did they really think that Scooter Libby was the end of it?

You know, I LIKE it when their attornies are concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Legally it was settled, but those darn shenanigans
are going to come back and tear at their pant legs. Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. It was not settled. Libby was convicted of OBSTRUCTION...
That means there was more to know. That means there were (most likely) crimes yet to be uncovered...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. note that I wrote 'legally'
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fitzmas in October?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've been wondering why I haven't seen Wilson discussing this book
Are the lawyers more involved right now than we thought? Wilson is just so quiet right now. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. But...but...Armitage admitted HE was the leaker!
That line may be good enough for Faux News viewers but it ain't good enough for me! Rove confirmed it. Cheney's office intentional spread it.

Scooter and Karl met privately to plot out their response? That's conspiracy! They lied to Snotty, the voice of the president? Anything he says is the same as if the president said it.

Let the investigations begin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. “and possibly Vice President Cheney”
We know damn well that Cheney was the one that sent them all out to
destroy the Wilsons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. let judgement run down as waters & righteousness as a
mighty stream. Amos 5:24
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. let's see, where did the Repubs stop during 'whitewater?'
after the first special prosecutor couldn't find anything?

after the Pilsbury report?

did they EVER stop?

did they not go after EVERY possible tangential aspect of whatever dealings the Clintons ever had, ruining how many lives in the process?

where's our Dan Burton?

our David Bossie?

amazing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Impeach the republicon traitors to the USA
k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Good! I hope they're pissing their pants
That means they know that their "clients" can still be prosecuted.

Lawyers don't spook easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thank you Scottie
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC