from Wikipedia. She seems to keep odd company for a Democrat and I wonder if she didn't change parties or was mis-identified as Dem lawyer in the WIKI article. For some reason she might have wanted to be identified as a Dem just because she worked for Biden back during the Thomas/Hill hearings and we know how they turned out. :shrug:
-------------
Harriet Grant is an American lawyer. Her husband is I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, with whom she has two children. <1> Grant was admitted to the District of Columbia bar on June 3, 1988.
Grant was one of the senior Democratic lawyers to interview Anita Hill during the Senate hearings on the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Clarence Thomas. <2> * Photo of Grant and husband with the Cheneys and Quayles, 2001.--------------
Her word against his - analysis of Anita Hill's testimony at the hearings for United States Supreme Court-designate Clarence Thomas; excerpt from David Brock's book 'The Real Anita Hill: The Untold Story' - Cover Story
National Review, May 10, 1993 by David Brock
<< Page 1 Continued from page 5. Previous | Next
The Weight of the Evidence
Considered separately, these and similar glitches do not seem terribly significant. Taken together, however, they raise serious questions about the consistency and credibility of her story. It is clear that the equal credibility granted to Anita Hill's word in relation to Clarence Thomas's by the Senate and the media is undeserved. By the time she had finished testifying, if one wanted to believe that she had told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, one would have to believe that all of the other people who had offered conflicting testimony and evidence were incorrect, or simply lying--Diane Holt, Harry Singleton, Phyllis Berry-Myers, Andrew Fishel, Charles Kothe, Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post,
and others whose statements are chronicled in the full version of this chapter as published in my book: John Doggett, Carlton Stewart, Stanley Grayson, Harriet Grant, Joe Biden, the two FBI agents, and all four of Anita Hill's own witnesses--Susan Hoerchner, John Carr, Allen Wells, and Joel Paul. alternatively, all of these individuals could have been correct, and Anita Hill could have made more than a dozen false statements under oath.
http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:1YQvLph9df4J:www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n9_v45/ai_13794068/pg_6+Harriet+Grant,+Clarence+Thomas&hl=en&client=firefox-a&strip=1