Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ron Fournier and the AP...changing from factual reporting to opinion and bias?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:15 PM
Original message
Ron Fournier and the AP...changing from factual reporting to opinion and bias?
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 11:38 PM by madfloridian
Fournier is acting head of the Associated Press, and The Politico writes of concerns about it.

Is Fournier saving or destroying the AP?

Ron Fournier says he regards Sandy Johnson, his predecessor as head of The Associated Press’s Washington bureau, as “a mentor.” Johnson, though, regards Fournier, who replaced her in a hard-feelings shake-up in May, as a threat to one of the most influential institutions in American journalism.

“I loved the Washington bureau,” said Johnson, who left the AP after losing the prestigious position. “I just hope he doesn’t destroy it.”


There’s more to her vinegary remark than just the aftertaste of a sour parting. Fournier is a main engine in a high-stakes experiment at the 162-year old wire to move from its signature neutral and detached tone to an aggressive, plain-spoken style of writing that Fournier often describes as “cutting through the clutter.”

In the stories the new boss is encouraging, first-person writing and emotive language are okay.


First person, emotive writing in a news article? I guess we will be seeing big changes.

Fournier received much criticism in March when he wrote an article about Barack Obama. As I read it, it appears to be a news article written and loaded with Fournier's opinion. This is not journalism.

Obama walks arrogance line

I don't want to post any of the article/oped/opinion piece. It's pretty ugly stuff from the head of the AP.

Today I read this at the Locust Fork Journal, which did so much coverage of the Don Siegelman case. Sounds like Fournier is hiring on at the AP one of Karl Rove's Alabama buddies in the media there. Sounds like it may be turning from straight news to opinion pieces.

Birmingham News Ace Reporter Hits the Big Time

This just in from Scott Horton.

Former Birmingham News ace reporter Brett Blackledge was recently hired by Ron Fournier, head of the AP’s Washington Bureau.

The AP’s Washington coverage has demonstrated a clear-cut GOP slant ever since Fournier took over, and the Blackledge hire is no doubt designed to help lock that in. Fournier’s key “inside source” and adviser is none other than Karl Rove.


I did a search on Blackledge to see just what was meant. I found a lot on him at Legal Schnauzer. This is the blogger who was recently fired from his job at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

More from Legal Schnauzer on Blackledge.

Hmmm, wonder why Blackledge would ignore what clearly was the main point of the Schmitz motion in favor of trashing last week's U.S. House Judiciary Committee report on selective prosecution? That was the report, of course, that called for sworn testimony from former White House adviser Karl Rove.

Isn't it interesting that Blackledge would write his story in such a "Rove-centric" way, ignoring the main point of the Schmitz motion? It was almost as if a certain bespectacled and doughy "birdie" was whispering in Brett's ear as he knocked out his "objective" report.


Another interesting article about Blackledge by Scott Horton at Pacific Free Press.

The article is called "Friends in Low Places: Karl Rove's Press Gang"

Back in October, as the House Judiciary Committee was conducting its first hearings into the prosecution of former Alabama Governor Don E. Siegelman, I spoke with Simon Heller, the legal director of a Washington-based advocacy organization called the Alliance for Justice. Heller told me he had gotten a telephone call.

“It was strange. The man on the other end of the phone identified himself as a reporter. But he certainly didn’t act like one. We had put out a press release talking about Judge Mark Fuller and the role he played in the Siegelman case, and questioning how, given his many conflicts, he had failed to recuse himself. But this reporter wasn’t interested in our view. Instead he was hysterical, screaming into the phone, asking how we dared to criticize such a great American? I’ve never had a press experience quite like that one.”
The name of the reporter? Brett Blackledge, the award-winning prize star of the Birmingham News.


Blackledge has carried the paper’s water in its two major campaigns of the last six years. The first was its effort to take down former Governor Siegelman through a blizzard of innuendo and tendentious reporting straight from the files of a group of partisan prosecutors. And the second, still running, is the effort to reshape the state’s legislature by demonstrating that a large part of it is enmeshed in hopeless graft and corruption by working simultaneously as junior college teachers and administrators. In most states, a reporter like Mr. Blackledge would not venture very far. But in ‘Bama, where they take their Koolaid unalloyed, he’s the real thing.

So it comes as no surprise that when 60 Minutes at length runs its story on Karl Rove and the Siegelman case, Blackledge scoops a print media exclusive: an interview with Karl Rove.


Also we learned today from Talking Points Memo that Fournier was emailing Rove about the Stillman case back in 2004...

Fournier to Rove: "Keep Up the Fight"

Karl Rove exchanged e-mails about Pat Tillman with Associated Press reporter Ron Fournier, under the subject line "H-E-R-O." In response to Mr. Fournier's e-mail, Mr. Rove asked, "How does our country continue to produce men and women like this," to which Mr. Fournier replied, "The Lord creates men and women like this all over the world. But only the great and free countries allow them to flourish. Keep up the fight."


We have apparently lost our media now in most ways. They pump up John McCain, and in general they will be as protective of him as they have been George Bush. In a week in which the McCain campaign was coming out with one idiotic thing after another, our so-called media kept him up and running and never did a thing to harm him.

When I thought of the Associated Press in the past, I would think of it as a news source. Sounds like it will be more of an opinion based organization now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NattPang Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is quite important, you know.
GOP control of the AP could really damage this election,
and this country!

I hope you send this to Keith Olberman and the rest of those
who can do some more work on this.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Josh Marshall puts it bluntly.
Fournier Responsible for All the Sucking?

As you know, we've been keeping tabs on the Associated Press's atrocious campaign coverage this year. And now The Politico's Michael Calderone has a potential answer to the question of why the premier wire service's coverage this year sucks so bad: Ron Fournier, the new head of the AP's Washington Bureau.


I think the AP even threatened to sue bloggers who quoted more than 5 words of their reports. That's just dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. my fournier story
I once wrote to Fournier to beg him to cover the conflict of interest that existed in the Bush family interest in Carlyle Group (Carlyle being one of the biggest defense contractors) and W. being commander in chief making war -- the profit that would accrue to the family through the spilling of precious American blood on foreign soil was ghoulish.

Fournier (who was then AP's WH correspondent and thus the most important reporter in Washington) wrote back to me that he had never heard of the Carlyle Group.

Either a consummate liar or stupid-ass lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I would say the first choice.
A real reporter would have to know about Carlyle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. AP needs to be left in the dust by some real competition.
They have about lost credence as an unbiased news source and are failing in their central position as the public's source of news to keep watch over its government.

Again, the news story is the corruption of the media itself. And who is there not complicit in this game with an audience large enough to report on it?

And the outrage is that the AP is perpetrating this assault on US democracy under smoke screens and approaching legality and so there is little chance of any significant consequences. The corruption is being entrenched beneath the radar of public scrutiny. This is the heart of the culture of corruption itself: the propaganda machine that makes all the other nasty stuff possible.

Bill Moyers for VP. He might be able to educate the public about the media's failings. And he doesn't take crap in a polite and open-minded way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Corruption of the media"
You are right. That is the worst danger to our country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. I remember Ron Fournier's yellowish tint on the AP from 2004 - he sucked & it sounds like he's worse
now. Guess he's dropping all pretense. So, now the reputation of the AP will be nothing but a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. The worst thing is, most newspapers are nothing but AP stories these days.
They have slashed their news bureaus, and just fill up their pages with wire reports. Reuters and UPI have already been absorbed into the GOP machine, and it looks like AP has officially followed. For many people, these are their only sources for national print news, whether they realize it or not.

I am absolutely sure this is part of Rove & co's plan to gain a stranglehold on our media and subvert our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. A decent local paper has just about shrunk to half its former size...
and is mostly ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. This, combined with...
...the growing number of typos and grammatical errors in AP copy lately makes their stuff damn near unreadable anymore.

A competent copy editor seems to be needed along with an unbiased news chief.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. American Propaganda
Been that way for years- and no doubt it's getting worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Agreed. Looks like they feel it's safe to become more openly bad though, and that's not good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. "openly bad"....good descriptive term for our media now.
No pretense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Also, looks like AP will be going after copyright infringement in court.
In case you missed this episode about the guy who runs the Drudge Retort...no, not the Drudge Report...it's opposite, the Retort.

http://www.editorsweblog.org/analysis/2008/06/associated_press_vs_blogosphere_facts_an.php

" Earlier this month, AP demanded that the Drudge Retort take down seven entries, which were in its view violating policies of fair use of content and the agency's copyright (AP wants to charge outside sources for using for excerpts longer than four words).
- Drudge Retort Web host Rogers Cadenhead consequently blogged about the takedown notice, and this created a ##-storm in the blogosphere, with many influential bloggers including TechCrunch's Michael Arrington and BuzzMachine's Jeff Jarvis calling on the boycott of AP content.
- Shortly after, on June 16, AP retreated, but didn't recant: it admitted that its request had been "heavy-handed" but didn't withdraw the takedown notices.
- Then, on June 19, AP issued a statement to say its conflict with Cadenhead had been resolved, after AP lawyers gave him guidelines to make the postings suitable, and that "both parties consider the matter closed." This really meant that Cadenhead agreed to modify the contested items and ended up not reposting them..."

I think I might stop linking to them until they made their new rules more clear.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is so sad
I sure do hope Obama makes it a priority to take our media back, if they don't stop him from getting elected first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I agree it is sad...and tragic
and most people take it as par for the course now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. It Sounds Like They Want to Adopt British-Style Journalism
The problem is one of ethics. Our universities don't have the same values hammered into our heads that the Brits do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. I turned on TV cable news a couple of times today...
Yes, they are protective of McCain in the same way they are of Bush. I don't know if it is fear of the GOP or if the talking heads just don't know any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC