Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goodling Passed Over Experienced Counterterrorism Prosecutor Because Wife Was A Democrat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 11:10 AM
Original message
Goodling Passed Over Experienced Counterterrorism Prosecutor Because Wife Was A Democrat
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 11:13 AM by cal04
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/28/goodling-passed-over-experienced-counterterrorism-prosecutor-because-wife-was-a-democrat/

In today’s Justice Department report on Monica Goodling’s and other DOJ officials’ politicization of the department, the investigators reveal that Goodling’s political considerations were “particularly damaging to the Department because it resulted in high-quality candidates for important details being rejected in favor of less-qualified candidates.” (http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/s0807/final.pdf)

In one disgraceful example, Goodling refused to hire “one of the one of the leading terrorism prosecutors in the country” because his wife was a Democrat:

He was an experienced terrorism prosecutor and had successfully prosecuted a high-profile terrorism case for which he received the Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service. … The candidate’s wife was a prominent local Democrat elected official and vice-chairman of a local Democratic Party. <…>

(Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Michael] Battle, (EOUSA Deputy Director and Cheif of Staff) Kelly, and EOUSA Deputy Director Nowacki all told us that Goodling refused to allow the candidate to be detailed to EOUSA solely on the basis of his wife’s political party affiliation. Battle said he was very upset that Goodling opposed the detail because of political reasons.

Goodling’s “damaging” refusal, the report notes, forced the EOUSA to “select a much more junior attorney who lacked any experience in counterterrorism issues” and was grossly unqualified for the position:

Because EOUSA had been unable to fill the counterterrorism detail after Goodling vetoed this candidate, a current EOUSA detailee was asked to assume EOUSA’s counterterrorism portfolio. … He had no counterterrorism experience and had less than the minimum of 5 years of federal criminal prosecution experience required by the EOUSA job announcement. Battle, Nowacki, Kelly, and Voris all said they thought that he was not qualified for the position, since he had no counterterrorism experience.

Another section of the report verified early claims that Goodling had forced out a career attorney “because Goodling had problems with the AUSA’s alleged sexual orientation.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um...why hasn't this admin been thrown into prison
It's just outrage after outrage after outrage

Laws broken after laws broken...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. The clear understanding of the law...
Taught at Pat Robertson U. is quite apparent in all of this.

One gets the feeling that their curriculum was designed by Fisher-Price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. If she has broken the law then she needs to
be prosecuted. What a jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Goodling - such an innocent goody-to-shoes name. Puke. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. is she being prosecuted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. isn't this undemocratic from a filthy regime that had the
audicity to argue that they were trying to spread democrasy around the world?

repugs are assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. "What is it about George W. Bush that makes you want to serve him?"
Goodling to Interviewee: What Is It About GWB That Makes You Want to Serve Him?
By Kate Klonick - July 28, 2008, 11:56AM

According to the OIG report released today, Angela Williamson, a deputy to Monica Goodling at the DOJ, was intimately involved in her bosses scurrilous hiring practices, attending interviews and often conducting interviews herself. Here's a sampling of the same questions that Goodling asked those being considered for political positions:

After Goodling resigned, Williamson typed from memory the list of questions Goodling asked as a guide for future interviews. Among other questions, the list included the following:

Tell us about your political philosophy. There are different groups of conservatives, by way of example: Social Conservative, Fiscal Conservative, Law & Order Republican.

hat is it about George W. Bush that makes you want to serve him?


http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/07/goodling_to_interviewee_what_i.php



Of course, some TPM readers have posted their own answers to the question:

"I want to offer my body and soul in servitude to George W. Bush because of the way his manhood is impressively displayed when he dons the codpiece."

"His perfect marbling of fat and muscle."

:rofl:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Enraged K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC