Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the Palin "baby" story matters.. It's INSURANCE FRAUD

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 03:57 PM
Original message
Why the Palin "baby" story matters.. It's INSURANCE FRAUD
for starters..

A 16 yr old child will eventually become too old to be covered on the parents insurance, and I'm betting that Mrs Guv has some pretty nifty insurance, as does Mr BP-OIL, so if the baby is "Theirs", that handicapped child willl have all the care he will need, BUT

if he's the child of their unwed daughter, no doubt they would end up raising the child anyway, if she plans to go to college..She would probably have insurance coverage for herself while she's in school, but who's gonna pay for that child's coverage, or take care of him,while she's a carefree college student?..and how will she "land a husband" with a handicapped baby?

if she kept the baby, and managed to finish college, that child's disability would surely present a "pre-existing" condition to just about any HR person she would interview with..

I can understand why the parents would want to "help her out", and this sort of thing happens all the time, but for her parents to phony-up the whole thing and claim the child as theirs is ..well..deceptive and insurance fraud..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there any basis for that assertion, aside the photo from the NGA meeting?
Because, otherwise, it is pure speculation including a 17 year old girl and it is pretty scuzzy to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Where does this speculation come from?
Was the governor seen as "not pregnant" for several months, and low and behold, a baby appeared?

Didn't her water break during some gathering in Texas, this past spring...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. pretty much.. LOTS of pics and a lot of "No way"s from coworkers
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 04:09 PM by SoCalDem
It's pretty viral online.. Eventually the truth will come out ..one way or another..


one interview she gave, she said her labor subsided long enough for her to fly home the next day..

another interview with a different paper, she said she was not in labor, but her water broke..and later she said it just "leaked"..

Apparently there were and are lots of rumors and suspicions in Alaska, but as just the governor of a low population state, it was probably no biggie...but as vice presidential candidate..well it might be a big deal..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. If it's true, well then no wonder she felt well enough to go back to work after 3 days!
I did think that was a little crazy. I was in so much pain at three days and feeling pretty much like crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
69. heck yeah!
three days later I felt like crap too. and my boobs were out of control, if you know what I mean....NO way I could've gone to work....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
78. Yeah, but how much work does it take to be governor of Alaska, for heaven's sakes?
First, oil revenues mean that there are no budget problems. Second, more people live in Los Angeles than in Alaska!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
98. I have a sister who was a surgical resident and went back to work within 3 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
76. what are the pics and "no ways" saying? that she was pregnant? or she wasn't? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Changenow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. There was six weeks between
the announcement and birth. She didn't look pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
63. The speculation comes from the fact that she's a republican ...
... and everyone knows no republican can tell the truth.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. This reminds me of desperate housewives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep. Bree thought she could get away with it too..
There are many families where this happens, and on a deathbead, someone finally breaks the silence, and Aunt so-and-so becomes Mom..or a sister becomes Mom..
But with a handicapped child, the truth might never "need" to come out..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. are there any alaska papers who raised these questions?
seems like it would have made headlines if it was even suspected!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. These are the same people who LOVE Ted Stevens & his crooked son
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 04:19 PM by SoCalDem
maybe they just look the other way..

I think they may be looking into it now.. time will tell..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Palin connnected to VECO...
"Palin raised at least $4,500 for her unsuccessful 2002 campaign for lieutenant governor from executives of VECO Corp., an oil services contractor at the heart of a massive influence-peddling investigation. Alaska Republican Sen. Ted Stevens is accused of accepting more than $250,000 in home renovations and gifts from VECO executives and failing to disclose them on his annual financial statements; the senator says he is innocent.

Palin received $500 each from nine VECO executives in December 2001, including then-CEO Bill Allen, who last year pleaded guilty to federal conspiracy, bribery and tax charges and agreed to cooperate in the corruption investigation."


http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2008/08/29/ap/politics/d92s4ms04.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
64. Nicely done, thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
62. The Anchorage Daily News, the state's largest
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 07:40 PM by KamaAina
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/v-printer/story/336115.html

Gov. Sarah Palin is expecting her fifth child.

"I will be delivering an addition to the first family," she said, smiling.

Palin, already seven months along, is due to give birth in mid-May, she said.

The news astonished reporters and others in the Capitol, who had no clue the governor was expecting. She simply doesn't look pregnant.


edit: header
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. So after announcing she is pregnant
and living a very public life as a governor for two months, she was able to fool every person she met? Not a single person noticed that she was not really pregnant?

Do you realize how stupid this sounds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Doesn't matter
It just became DU reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
91. What the hell is that supposed to mean?
Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Google says
"4,120,000 (results) for how to fake a pregnancy. (0.22 seconds) "

Not saying she did or didn't but it certainly wouldn't have been hard to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. She was only "officially" pregnant for a month (or less)
she's the damned governor..she controls her schedule, and her meetings..and she does seem to be wearing jackets indoors.. for all we know, she may have "padded herself".. She's the boss, so who's gonna confront her..

she claimed to have been 7 months before she told her own kids :eyes:.. how dumb is that? people you LIVE with didn't notice?....sissie gets fat & Momma has a miracle baby? The 6 yr old might buy it, but not the 13 yr old..:rofl:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. So what real proof do you have?
you remind me of 911 truthers analyzing internet video to "prove" that 911 was an inside job. Don't you feel any obligation to provide some actual evidence before smearing this woman and her daughter? Or is there no place for basic human decency when it comes to politics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. chill.. they're not gonna win anyway
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I will not chill - I refuse to sink to their level. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. So vote for her..or don't or find a "Kittens R Fluff" thread
sheeez are you her brother/sister:):rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. So you are OK with the daughter being political collateral damage
as long as it damages McCain or Palin? That is a despicable attitude - kids should not be fair game in any political race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
66. "daughter being political collateral damage"
Now, who would do that?

Who would endanger their own child and use them as a political football?

Seriously.

What kind of woman would support republican "values"?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #66
80. Who has she endangered?
Perhaps I am missing your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. "Who has she endangered?" Seriously! She's a woman voting GOP, who has she NOT endangered!? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. That's an intelligent reply - she is guilty of everything
so of course she is guilty of this. Got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #82
89. "That's an intelligent reply" I accept your apology. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #89
96. I am glad you have retained your sense of humor. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #96
100. And I am glad you have retained the final word on the subject. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. .
close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. What are you implying? Don't be shy. nt
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 05:24 PM by hack89
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
102. Totally off topic, but that photo is too darn cute!
My 100 pound Siberian Husky is very jealous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
72. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
48. You've just had a taste of the dungeon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Changenow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. She fooled almost no one
even the press observed she didn't look pregnant. Her staff said she didn't look pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. And you have real evidence to support this? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Exactly.. they "knew" and they "understood", but it's still FRAUD
and we all know how republicans rail about the welfare momma who use "other people's babies" to try & get welfare..

Try using YOUR medical insurance for your sister's kid.. you'll end up in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. So she was at governors conference when her water broke
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 05:29 PM by hack89
and she fooled everyone? Got it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Not only would no one have had to notice that she wasn't pregnant...
....but no one would have had to notice that her daughter WAS.

And there would be countless people at the hospital who would have known that she hadn't really delivered a baby. And there would be people who would know that the daughter had.

This is all total, utter nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. She flew back to Alaska AFTER her water broke?

The details of the birth of Gov Palin's child are ironic, as it leads one to question her pro-life principles. A reasonably intelligent person can determine that Palin was reckless with the life of her unborn child. (Go to www.adn.com, April 22 edition for the fully-disclosed details).

Palin made the decision to travel to Texas to a Governor's conference while 36 weeks pregnant, a time during which obstetricians would tell you it’s foolish to travel via plane. Air travel is a known risk for pregnancy complications, which is indeed what happened. The governor, while on a self-promoting trip to deliver a speech, had premature rupture of fetal membranes: her water broke.

Call your local OB department and ask what to do if you think that your water has broken. You’ll be advised to seek an immediate hands-on examination by an obstetrician. The baby will be placed on a monitor to make sure it’s OK. Premature rupture of membranes can lead to life-threatening infection and premature delivery.

What did Sarah Palin do? She did NOT go to a local hospital and did NOT have her baby checked on a fetal monitor to make sure it was OK. She called her family practice doctor in Alaska for advice. What advice was given isn’t clear, but it’s clearly quoted that she "did not ask for a medical OK to fly". Whether it was OK to fly should be the FIRST question anyone considering traveling by air should have, if they were at all interested in protecting the life of the unborn. Regardless, she decided to give her speech at the conference without having any evaluation other than the long-distance advice of a family practitioner. Her speech was more important to her than making any effort to make sure her unborn child was OK. Then, she decided to fly back to Alaska, an 11-hour trip. In addition, she failed to inform flight personnel that her water had broken.

Airlines are unequipped to handle most emergencies at 30,000 feet, particularly the kind Palin put her unborn child at markedly increased risk for. These emergencies include birthing a premature infant or uncontrolled maternal bleeding. This was her FIFTH pregnancy and delivery can happen rapidly and unexpectedly. The baby or Palin could easily have died.

In the ADN article Palin downplays her decision to fly, implying traveling was reasonable as she wasn't in labor. If so, then why was she immediately hospitalized after returning to Alaska? Why was there an induced delivery of a 36-week infant by 6:30 am soon after her return? Again, ask any OB doctor. Induced delivery of a premature infant ALWAYS indicates a problem. The two most likely would be fetal infection, (a likely event given her failure to seek meaningful medical attention for her baby) or fetal distress by monitor.

Ask your OB doctor if the risks Palin took with the life of her unborn child are risks they would have advised for ANY reason. Then ask yourself whether Palin is truly pro-life, or only pro-Palin.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/may/26/sarah-palin-as-mccains-vp/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Official Release from Governor's Office
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No. 08-060
Palin Family Welcomes Fifth Child
April 18, 2008, Anchorage, Alaska – Governor Sarah Palin and her husband Todd
welcomed the arrival of their fifth child this morning. The Palins were thankful that
the Governor’s labor began yesterday while she was in Texas at the Governor's
Energy Conference where she gave the keynote luncheon address, but let up enough
for her to travel on Alaska Airlines back to Alaska in time to deliver her second son.
Trig Paxson Van Palin was born at 6:30 a.m. and weighs six pounds, two ounces.
The Governor and Trig are both doing well and resting comfortably.
The family released the following statement:
"Trig is beautiful and already adored by us. We knew through early testing he would
face special challenges, and we feel privileged that God would entrust us with this
gift and allow us unspeakable joy as he entered our lives. We have faith that every
baby is created for good purpose and has potential to make this world a better place.
We are truly blessed."
The Palins have four other children including Track, 18, Bristol, 17, Willow, 13 and
Piper, 7.
###
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Yet.. in another interview she stated she did NOT go into labor
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 04:54 PM by SoCalDem
that her water broke.. and later she amended THAT to "leaked a bit"..

As long as she was governor of that lightly populated state no one cared.. but now she's in the big-time, and lies & deceptions matter..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. This is getting TOO easy...
Where does this end up? With Palin giving a tearful press conference after "those MEAN Democrats destroyed her and her daughter's life"?

Again, too easy. Smells like a setup. How did it make it past McCain's vetting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. McCain's vetting:
you're a looker
Alaska's a red state

sounds good to me :)
you're in honey:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. 10 minutes of Googling and we have:
Pictures of her two months before delivery with a flat tummy...

Rumors of her 16 yr. old daughter home for months with "mono" at the baby's birth...

Her flying home on commercial air 8 to 11 hours AFTER her water broke...

Too, too easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #41
85. where are the pictures, do you have a link? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #41
86. Self-Delete Posted wrong spot
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 10:20 PM by Junkdrawer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. She knew the baby was safe.. in her daughter's uterus
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heather MC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. ummm Very Odd indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Diadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. Another article here. She says she felt safe flying
http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/apr/22/palins-flight-labor-falls-under-scrutiny/

Gov. Sarah Palin’s decision to make the eight-hour flight from Dallas to Anchorage has some people wondering about the possible safety hazards of flying while in the late stages of pregnancy.

The governor, eight months into her pregnancy, noticed amniotic fluid Thursday morning prior to giving a keynote luncheon address at the Republican Governor’s Energy Conference in Texas. After wrapping up the speech, Palin and her husband consulted with her physician about possibly flying home on an earlier flight. After being granted permission from her doctor, she and her husband proceeded with the trek home.

snip:Most airlines have specific policies concerning air travel during pregnancy, especially during the final months. For women traveling in the final month of pregnancy, a “permission-to-travel” letter is required by her primary physician. However, most restrictions rely on an honor policy that leaves the decision to notify the airline in the hands of the passenger.

The governor did not feel the need to inform the airline of her condition, Leighow said.
---------------------------
Alaska airlines doesn't have the policy. More at link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
46. This is useful but not for the rumors about the daughter...
...It seems to reveal a casual disregard for the safety of the child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
49. EXTREME risk of infection
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 06:07 PM by seemslikeadream
A woman is told immediately to go to the hospital if the water breaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
70. i got my ass chewed out cause i jumped in the shower for 3 or 4 minutes and then
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 08:33 PM by seabeyond
went to hospital. doctor chewed me out and said RIGHT to the hospital

both preg water broke. both right to hospital 5 min away and both induced
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. Actually, it doesn't matter until it's actually true
I mean, do you have a SHRED of evidence, besides a picture and an echo chamber?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. and if no one investigates it, no one will ever know..will they?
Now that she's high profile, people will be asking a lot more questions about a lot of things..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Someone knows for sure. The doctors.
Some doctor out there knows for sure whether Palin or her daughter is having a baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. poppy and his crew know how to deal with those types of things...
toe tags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
56. And none of them will talk. If they do, because of HIPAA, they would lose
their license to practice medicine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #56
74. On the other hand, if they fraudulently signed a birth certificate..
application, the MD is violating both state and federal law, and I think the federal law makes it a felony. Then the falsified birth certificate is used to apply for a SS#. If the baby was born at home with only s/he in attendance, maybe the practitioner would take the chance. In a hospital delivery, you have nurses, the OBG, techs, an anesthesiologist, a neonatologist generally in the room because it's high risk et al, coming and going.,

I don't see how they could have pulled something like this off, without someone dropping the dime. I also think that MD would be more worried about jail than a HIPAA violation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #74
93. Well...I had questions about the
birth certificate too.

OTOH, new birth certificates are sometimes issued for adoptees, aren't they, and that's legal? I suppose a governor could fast-forward an adoption process. To my knowledge birth certificates aren't necessarily filed for several days after the birth Just wondering. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
54. I don't get why many here don't want this investigated?
Surely all our Dems fall under the "microscope" as "Public Figures" like Rock Stars and the rest of the Entertainment folks...why should she be treated differently than Brittany Spears or Paris? Why is she above it all. Why are any Politicians better than the rest of us when they go out there and put themselves in front of us asking for our vote?

Frankly, I'd leave the Celebrities alone unless there's something really bad..that has to do with animal or environmental cruelty and a "few other things" and allow MUCH MORE scrutiny of our Politicians since they are the ones who are in charge of our country...from Lobbyists to Environmental and Human Rights issues. Plus our Health care and whether we go to WAR to "Defend Ourselves" ...or just because we "Want To."

Politicians these days really have much more power than a few Celebrities whose publists encourage behavior that they can promote to get "Hype" for their client. That's both the celebrities job and the agents job to do that. BUT...Politicians "used to be" supposed to protect our Constitution and fight for what that Constitution and Bill of Rights contracted with the American people.

Something has gotten lost along the way when we should be "quiet" and not go after a politician just because it might hurt one constituency or anothers.

LET IT ALL COME OUT! Freedom of the Press is Freedom to DIG OUT FACTS, though...not what our Media Whoredom (McCorporate Media) indulges in these days which is acting as an agent to Corporate Powers who care nothing about our Constitution, BOR's or Free Markets, Fair Markets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #54
83. Go over to Freeper land and read the threads on Obama's citizenship
and you will understand why. Shit flows two ways - do you really want the MSM to investigate and amplify every internet rumor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. I'd like to see some evidence as well. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. Yeah, it's not like she went to an Islamic madrassa or...
...refused to put her hand over her heart during the pledge of allegiance or was best friends with a mad bomber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
30. there is something not right with her story
not caring about if her water broke? not going to an emergency room immediately? that`s not right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
40. down's syndrome
It is by far the highest risk defect for a pregnancy late in life, since the age of the eggs makes them more prone to mistakes when the chromosomes are separated in the 2nd stage meiosis.

The risk of down syndrome is comparatively miniscule in young women.

The fact that the baby has down's syndrome suggests that the gov is the moth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I personally know 3 women whose FIRST child had downs
two were born in their 20's..and another was 18..

Downs happens most often in older women, but it also happens to others as well..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. most ds babies are born to women under 30. google it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. You're both right
The chance of Downs babies in young mothers is miniscule, yet young mothers have the majority of them. That's because there are so many fewer children born to 35+ year old mothers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. Er, most babies are born to women under 30.
Just like "most auto accidents happen within 2 miles of home."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
55. Actually, you are completely wrong. With the advances in
genetic testing, MORE children with Down Syndrome are being born to YOUNGER moms who aren't getting the Advanced Maternal Age testing.

Older moms get the testing, therefore, they often decide to terminate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
73. Yes, but you cannot rule out the teenager.
it does happen, and there is no reason for the teen to be exempt.

There is something fishy about this story. and grandmothers have done this all through history: taken their grandchild as their baby to protect the reputation of their daughters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
51. Know why this sounds fishy to me?
My water leaked at 8 months along. 2 hours later, I had a baby girl. My first. Who in their right mind would get on a plane and travel for 11 hours? It's just not logical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trudyco Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #51
60. exactly - would she endanger the baby and herself by flying???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #51
71. again, i had two and straight to hospital. i couldnt imagine sittin on a plane
away from help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
52. It's a big 'if' and I see little evidence.
I put this on the same level as 'John McCain born in Panama' or 'Obama not really born in Hawaii!'. Unless there is good evidence to back up this rumor, repeating it and speculating on the implications is irresponsible, embarrassing, and (dare I say it) Rovian. Palin should be assessed on her political record and how she performs in the campaign, not on such thin gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Changenow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. McCain was born in Panama. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Quite true, but not in a context that would prevent his taking office.
Nobody serious worries about McCain's legal eligibility for the job. The baby story has some eyebrow raising aspects, I'm just saying that it would be extremely dumb for people to jump to conclusions and embarass the Democratic campaign by equating rumor with fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #58
75. On an American Military Base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #52
67. Wasn't there some "thin" gossip about a prominent Dem who was Candidate for President?
"thin gossip" that was shut down by both Dems, Repugs and the McCorporate Media that only came out when more investigation, photo's and revelations made it all impossible to not to take notice of?

We "the people" have a right to know what our "elected officials and those running for elected office" have in their background which can be used by the oppostition for blackmail.

The issues of candidates representing themselves as banners for a certain kind of "moral/social distinction" above the other candidate also comes into question...if ya' think about it.

If there's no distinction between the behavior both public and private by our Entertainers as fodder for either promiting their careers (Paris Hilton) or ruining them making them objects of ridicule (Brittany Spears) then why should our Politicians be held to a different standard since they are both "Public Figures" and "Entertainers?" Should we expect better of them? Neither Paris, nor Brittany swear to uphold the Constitution or Bill of Rights as entertainers...but all of our "elected officials" do.

I realize our Consitution doesn't have a "Morals Clause" but if one looks at the Political Scandals of the past we can all see it was how "abuse of power in office" in so many cases goes back to the person in question lacking in a "moral compass about their personal behavior." If you are going to lie and abuse power in your elected office...chances are...somewhere along the line you did it "successfully" in your private life.

We need investigations...but we need to be careful about political/partisan Witch Hunts. The McCorporate Media doesn't investigate much anymore...so it's up to the bloggers to piece things together from fragmented reports to pull together the whole picture. Folks should be digging and digging about Palin. It's what keeps the system honest, in the end.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #67
92. You're quite right. I'm just saying we should tread carefully
The election's 2 months away. I'd rather lose a few weeks putting the pieces together if the story is true than go off half-cocked and have it be an embarrassment that cost Obama votes, is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
53. Good Point! K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
57. and how will she "land a husband" with a handicapped baby?
Are for real?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. There's a reason I put it in "quotes"
Rightwingers like her probably think the best thing their daughters can do is to marry & have babies..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
65. You do realize that birth certificates name the mother, don't you?
This thread is quite embarassing. There would be attending physicians,hospital records, etc. - it would be quite a conspiracy involving lots of people to pull off what you suggest. Highly implausible.

This is just specious speculation and it is harmful to a child and draws attention away from real issues. This is just the kind of crap I would expect from people like Swiftboaters and Freepers but not here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #65
77. I think the thread is embarassing, but I doubt that the governor would have a hard time with that.
Implausible but not impossible. I'm not saying that this rumor has any credibility, just that politicians and other people with power can pull off lots of things that are impossible for the average person.

I think the important thing is that the child has loving parents. The rest of it feels like none of my business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. I meant that the thread was an embarrassment to this forum, not the Governor
This is about the most hopelessly inane and unproductive post I have ever had the sorry opportunity to witness.

People speculating with absolutely no substance whatsoever (that I can see) whether the Governor Of Alaska pretended to be the mother of her teen daughter's baby. I guess because it would resemble a TV series they had seen. Unbelieveable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #79
88. Understood. I meant that I doubt the governor would have a hard time pulling off a cover-up
not that I think there's any evidence of that. People with power don't operate under the same rules as the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sisaruus Donating Member (703 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
68. IF (big if) this speculation is true...
It is possible they adopted the baby. In which case there would be no insurance fraud. And where's the line between privacy and deception?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #68
95. When you concoct a "pioneer woman" perils of pauline-esque story
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 06:20 AM by SoCalDem
and lie and deceive people to cover up something that might be embarrassing.. especially when she has a history of "doing things HER way", and punishing people by using her official stature
..

And she's using her "story" to embellish a woefully thin resume...and to bolster Grampa's lame campaign by tugging at the heartstrings of blubbery women..(the low information ones)

Isn't that what we have seen happening for 8 long years?

If their daughter got pregnant and they decided to adopt the baby..bravo for them.. just don't make up a goofball story and expect people to not question it:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
84. Kicking this (and I will continue to do so)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
90. Wait a minute, who's the father?
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 10:43 PM by burythehatchet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #90
94. Probably a teenage boy.
Since the mother is apparently a teenage girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
97. it would also point out Sarah and Todd's failure as parents and christians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
99. THIS IS RUMOR MONGERING: DU loses ALL credibility when you do stuff like this
Can you wait for the damned facts instead of looking at pictures? I know women who don't look pregnant when they are very far along. I also teach high school and sometimes, teenage girls have stomachs; just part of their build.

I highly recommend that you not do this sort of thing unless you have actual facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
101. This is the 2008 version of "Chelsea is Webster Hubbell's child"
It's just ridiculous, but I guess people have to have something to babble about.
It is far more likely that a 44 year old woman would give birth to a Down Syndrome baby than a 16 year old girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #101
103. NO! This is TOTALLY DIFFERENT...read the Post and Thread..
instead of "shooting from hip." Then you will understand what it's all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #101
105. It's totally preposterous--ya'll have been watching too much "Desperate Housewives"!
The Palins could have adopted the child (assuming for the sake of argument that it is their grandchild) and he would be covered by insurance.

And if we are going to make an episode of Desperate Housewives out of this--don't you think she would have padded herself to look huge like Bree did.

I'm sure we'll be reading about the right wing radio pundits making much hay out of these rumors next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #105
106. Adopting the little boy would have been a great thing to do, and yes
he would have been completely "insurable", but for a head of state to concoct a whopper and expect people to not notice or to not care...well that's the issue here..

She has stuck her nose into every female crotch, with all her pontification of right & wrong and what's godly and what's shameful..and how any birth control is abortion..so she made herself the tip of the spear, so to speak..

I wonder what the governor would do if a state employee was using government-provided insurance to pay for maternity expenses of a child, masquerading as the employee's.. would they be fired ,prosecuted and made to reimburse the state?

If they adopted the little guy, then just SAY so.. A simple "our daughter has had an unplanned pregnancy, and we will be welcoming her child, and adopting him, since he is a special needs child".. nothing wrong with that..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #106
107. Actually maternity expenses of a minor ARE insurable
My cousin had a child when she was an unmarried minor and all of the medical bills were paid by my uncle (her father's) insurance.

I read an article about Palin's mother in law Faye Palin yesterday. She was quoted as saying she is planning on voting for Obama. She also talked about Sarah Palin's pregnancy and the genetic testing and how they all knew the child would have down syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
104. Thanks for "getting on top of this" So Cal...you have captured Pics that are Scrubbed
and it's important to keep on top of this. I didn't ever want to believe what I now know about John Edwards..but it's time to let "IT ALL COME OUT!...on BOTH SIDES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC