Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

St. Paul. Does the Constitution allow us to obtain the names of every police, sheriff deputy,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 03:15 PM
Original message
St. Paul. Does the Constitution allow us to obtain the names of every police, sheriff deputy,
national guard person who was involved in a physical detention or arrest since last Friday?

Does the Constitution allow us to find out what orders and training these people received?

Does the Consitution allow us to find out if anyone in the Republican Party gave orders, paid, or requested a plan to intimidate in a physical manner, to record their legal identification for their databases, to keep them off flights, to create records that can be blown out of proportion for future lock down?

Does the Constitution allow us to find out if there are any extra forces acting as part of the police-deputies such as current or former military, intelligence employess, Nlackwater, other paid mercenaries, political fitness roughnecks? Were the police-deputy forces enhanced or guided?

WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?

IS THIS A GIFT FROM THE REPUBLICAN PARTY TO THE TWIN CITIES OF MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL, their subrubs and the State?

What a crummy, crappy, sxxxxxy thing to do to the people.

THIS WAS PLANNED FOR A LONG TIME. IT IS TRANSPARENT.

SHAME ON PAWLENTY. SHAME ON EVERYONE WHO WENT ALONG WITH THIS INCLUDING THE MAYORS - ALL OF THEM.

Back to the question - what are our rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. if they're public employees, their info is public.
unless by some chicanery they're completely off the books. which is not likely, despite the circumstances.
each city that sent cops must account for them or they won't get paid.
(their pay now is voluntary overtime; the department of Homeland Security is paying for a big chunk of it along with money allocated by Congress.

they will likely refuse to give up names as a security matter. you might even have to file a freedom of information act request (or if no movement, a lawsuit.)

but that info's public. you sup at the public trough, your info is public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Amy Goodwin was on with Thom Hartman today, and she was saying
that the police can hold them for 36 hours before charging them. The 36 hours are 36 "business" hours, so if they arrested all those people on Friday, they could technically hold them unil Thursday because of the weekend and the holiday. Well planned indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think I'll change one word - instead of planned, I should say PLOTTED.
Edited on Tue Sep-02-08 04:54 PM by higher class
They would be remiss if they didn't plan, buy they went BEYOND planning.

This was a plot.

Again, a small per cent of the plotters are making Minnesota look really bad.....

... and as a database of future no-flyers get entered into the Poindexter-Cheney database and the victims are left to mend physcially and psychologically.

Then there were the young kids that were in the house that was attacked by cops with guns and every imaginable kind of weapon.

What is happening to this country.

I am ashamed of Pawlenty and his goons and all his Republican kind.

It will be obvious to the entire country that a sick band of archivists went out of their way to mess things up - but the plot against peaceful protesters and the media is SICKER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think you might have meant "anarchists",
but I'm not sure. Don't take me wrong, ok? Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yes, anarchists ... thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC