Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ruh, roh. Steven Schmidt (hardboiled Rovian minion) brings up "paternity tests"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:05 AM
Original message
Ruh, roh. Steven Schmidt (hardboiled Rovian minion) brings up "paternity tests"
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/212778.php

From an insider and longtime friend of the site ...

(snip)

Either McCain's vetting process was a complete sham. Or his press operation is the worst in modern presidential politics history. Or some unholy blend of both.
Campbell Brown isn't the story - people are underestimating her, as they always have. No, the story is that Tucker Bounds went on national television without material to answer what is maybe the simplest, most straightforward follow-up question any reporter can ask: "What's your evidence for that assertion?" And I suspect that the reason they canceled Larry King is not to punish CNN (it doesn't work that way) it's that they still couldn't come up with an answer to the question by the time his show aired.

Now look at this comment from McCain honcho Steve Schmidt to Katie Couric last night: "Members of this campaign went to off-the-record lunches with reporters today, and they were asked if she would do paternity tests to prove paternity for her last child. Smear after smear after smear, and it's disgraceful and it's wrong. And the American people are going to reject it overwhelmingly when they see her."

First of all, that's the first time I've heard anyone in the campaign/political press throw out the notion of paternity tests. So Schmidt is to blame for bringing that issue into the mainstream. If anyone is smearing the candidate, it's Schmidt. This is as cynical a tactic as I've ever seen in politics.


(end snip)

emphasis mine

Smearing their own candidate, and then blaming the press. Who could have imagined? BTW, the mainstream press is asking about paternity tests off the record? That is interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's called "pre-emptive self-defense"
It didn't work five years ago, and it won't work now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Also "Off-The-Record"
The press claimed they could transport themselves to other planets in the blink of an eye, and that Palin is actually Genghis Khan in drag.

Don't believe it? Bet you can't prove that it didn't happen, you silly Liberal!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. It's a (near) perfect defense.
I don't think it happened, and even if it did it doesn't mean a damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sound of can opening, distinct odor of worms...
I think Sarahcuda has been lying to everyone..

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. I thought it was maternity that was in question, not paternity
It is interesting news anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. The only reason I can think of why anyone would
ask this question is because Down's Syndrome babies resemble Oriental's to some degree and by extension, the Native Alaskans..the Eskimo (not sure of what they are called in her area of Alask. Could her story of a Down's Syndrome baby be a cover for a "tryst" with a Native Alaskan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Todd Palin is part Eskimo - what I think is more interesting
is whether the kid is Track Palin's with Mercedes Johnston, the sister of Levi Johnston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. huh? do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Reporters are asking about paternity tests? Really?
Interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Reporters typically don't like to have words put in their mouths.
I wouldn't be surprised if he gets asked to name them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hopefully McSame's dutifully fawning press will turn on him over this. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. Not to mention shouldn't it be "maternity"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I think genetic testing in general is what they meant.
In regular paternity testing, they check the child's, mother's, and presumptive father's genetic markers. Subtract the markers mother has in common with child, and compare what's left with father's markers.

If Ms. Palin is the child's mother, by definition she should match 50% of Trig's markers. If Trig's mother is really Bristol, then there should only be a 25% match with Sarah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Finally.
They're looking at the insurance scam angle. If the baby is the daughter's, their insurance will not pay for any of the treatment that a special needs child is sure to require. If it's her's it will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. "It’s The Corruption, Stupid" that they are distracting from
With a false story that will be blames on the opposition.
Yes they are trying to get this in the media, for the obvious reason:

"It’s The Corruption, Stupid"

===========
Abramoff, McCain, Palin, Corruption & the GOP...
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/1/1829/47514

This is important. In September 2006 it became clear that the November Election would turn on the issue of corruption. All signs point to the same thing happening this year.

I’ll try and put this in the simple language of politics:

It’s The Corruption, Stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC