|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
CLG_News (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:31 PM Original message |
If Sarah Palin's daughter 'gives birth" on Oct. 2, that's an excuse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gato Moteado (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. what if she gives birth right before election night? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. That made me laugh. god I'm bad. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Well she doesn't have to be anywhere particular for people to VOTE on Nov. 4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tribetime (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Then Joe can do a Town Hall, let her stay home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CLG_News (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yup! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. Having the baby could mess up the odd couple's wedding day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. It would be terribly premature on October 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whoa_Nelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. One would hope McPalin wouldn't induce early labor for Bristol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Palin usues her children as props |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 05:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. It better not be born on Christmas. My bet? She's not pregnant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adamuu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. Best we can tell, captian, is that they are born pregnant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CLG_News (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. LOLOL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adamuu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. heh.. .i've used this joke a couple times now. I guess thats okay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. (LOL!!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CLG_News (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Um, let's be serious: Only Republicans can have virgin births. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oeditpus Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. They reproduce at will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Yup. It's not a lack of will-power; it's a lack of won't-power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
10. The real question is - will she give birth in a manger? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Well since she practiced abstension, then it must be an immaculate conception. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Berry Cool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
28. "Immaculate conception" does not mean what you think it means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
19. I think Btristol may be a closet Democrat. After all, she already stood up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
20. for some strange reason I feel that she is not going through with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eugeneliberal (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. There will be some sort of crisis... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cags (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. No!!! Its no damn excuse people have babies without their mothers present every damn day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shandris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
23. I thought Bristol's pregnancy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
24. If there are "Complications" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
25. If there are "Complications" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
27. That would be premature by the announced timetable - six months |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC