Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So the bailout bill is an amendment to a bill from 2007?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
amerikat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:13 PM
Original message
So the bailout bill is an amendment to a bill from 2007?
Cspan says HR 3997(bailout) is an amendment to a 2007 bill meant to replace a bill from 1986. I am totally confused. Are there any parliamentary procedure experts in the house.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll674.xml


http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h3997/show

help me out here before my head explodes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not exactly ...

There was a provision in it that amended a law from 2006 that was itself an amendment to a 1986 law.

It involved the averaged reserve rate required for transaction accounts (checking, etc.), allowing it to fall to zero for given periods of time. The amendment would have changed the enactment date of this provision from Oct. 1, 2011 to Oct. 1, 2008.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amerikat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks. Is it just quicker to get an amendment to an old bill to the
floor for a vote than a new bill? Doesn't have to go thru committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, that's a complex question ...

This sort of thing is standard operating procedure for Congress. Bills that go through committees and then are voted upon are often filled with language like, "subsection (C) of Section (1) is thus amended ..." It's what a lot of legislation does, amend established US code.

They have regulatory laws on the books already. It's simply more efficient to change certain aspects of the existing structure than to author an entirely new set of codes.

FWIW, this particular provision of the now failed bailout stunned me. I wasn't even aware of the move to a zero reserve system to be implemented in 2011. That provision passed *unanimously*. The enactment date being moved up to Wednesday is curious.

I did a little research on it and don't have any good answers. I can see why it was desired, but I'm uncommitted on whether it is a good or bad thing, but I'm leaning toward bad. The UK and Canada operate on a zero reserve system, and their banks tend to hold 6% or so in reserve. It's partly about the Fed and easing money flow, but I'm not versed enough in the intricacies of it to know how it all works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amerikat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks.....you have enlightened me on the particular bill.
How sausages are made will be left for another discussion. Thanks RoyGBiv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC