|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-05-08 11:10 AM Original message |
McCain spokeswoman said the reason McCain voted for pork was because it was really, really important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-05-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
1. The pork you agree with isn't called pork...it's called "really, really important" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amdezurik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-05-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. well there is the pork you know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-05-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. it's not pork...it's tenderloin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-05-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
4. There is a big difference between "a bridge to nowhere" and some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-05-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Are you saying the money for NASCAR in that bill wasn't pork? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-05-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. No, I am saying that sometimes pork is not pork. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-05-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
7. I thought we established that pork=earmarks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-05-08 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. Let's review my Two Rules of Pork |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-05-08 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
9. So, the Republicans really DO understand "nuance" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC