Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which of OUR "freedoms" did we fight the Vietnam war to defend?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sixmile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:34 PM
Original message
Which of OUR "freedoms" did we fight the Vietnam war to defend?
To stop the "Red Menace"?
Freedom of speech?

The Vietnam vets in my family are still messed up 40 years later and have no consensus about why they were sent to fight
a brutal, long, costly war in southeast Asia for with no defined reason or exit strategy.

My point is Vietnam was one of the worse chapters in U.S. history, and those who seek to glamorize it, or put lipstick on it if you will, are
misguided and uninformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mth44sc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. We fought for the right
to be wrong...

How little we've learned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Freedom to funnel trillions to our "defense" manufacturers.
Thank God we won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimWis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You've got that right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't you find it interesting that we have
literally and figuratively come full circle when we talk about the Vietnam war? I believe that the Iraq war's very being started with the withdrawal of troops in Vietnam. The Dick Cheneys, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, * and all of the others that got us into Iraq never got over Vietnam.

They never got over Vietnam because they were so steeped in their ideology that bombs and greed are the cure for everything that they never stopped to look at the human costs.

It was a mistake not to prosecute all of the men i mentioned above and others for their Crimes during the Nixon Watergate years and Vietnam. If we would have prosecuted them and put them in jail there would have been no Iraq and we probably could have prevented 9/11.

We still have Vietnam Vets homeless in this country, many Vietnam vets suicides to count.

Until we rectify the past with the present we will never truly be able to move ahead in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. None of them. Whenever we send our troops into harm's way,
the ones doing the sending insist that they are "defending freedom" so we don't impeach their lying asses for sending them in the first place. Unintelligent, uninformed people insist we are "defending our freedom" because that's what you're supposed to think when our young men and women march into battle. There are almost certainly intelligent informed people out there who, nevertheless, insist that war is about "defending our freedom" because contemplating the real reasons for phony war is too frightening.

When I served in the Gulf in 1991, I knew it was just about oil; but I made believe it was really because of Kuwait's violated sovereignty, because that was easier to believe in when I thought about the possibility of dying.

My dad, who served in Vietnam, has been bitter and angry about it since he got back, knowing how many American boys died propping up the sleazy, corrupt, morally vacant dictatorship of South Vietnam. It sure as hell wasn't about freedom or democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sixmile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thanks for your service, Aristus
Edited on Mon Oct-06-08 09:48 PM by sixmile
Because all of the men in my family served in Vietnam, I was urged by them not to enlist -even during peacetime. Plus I'm not big on giving unearned respect.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's very kind, thank you.
Care to join me in a salute to my father?




SAL-LUTE!! :patriot:

Oh, here's me: (You don't have to salute; I was enlisted... :-) )

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sixmile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I've got to get some pics of my Dad, Stepdad and Uncles to post
Handsome bastards. I salute your Father and You.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thanks. I'm looking forward to seeing pics of your family.
Salute to them, too. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I salute you BOTH!!!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Thank you.
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Both of my grandfathers were in France during WWI.
CM returned to his farm and weathered the depression while raising 6 kids.





One of his sons, my Dad, enlisted and served in the Air Force during the Korean War. (second from right)






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. A salute, and a hearty thanks.
:patriot:

I was going to give them a "shout-out", but Governor Snowjob Squareglasses has effectively killed the term...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Thanks for what you do, sarge.
It's a gig I couldn't handle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. We fought to thin out the young men in the country
because they are a threat to old men. That's what old men do..start wars to get rid of competition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
27. That is accurate in a scary way nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. You won't find anyone here that will glamorize the Vietnam War
However...hate the war, not the warriors.
Lots of folks had no choice but to serve.
I am not talking politics here and not referencing ANY high profile Vietnam vet...but we not only fucked over the Asians we also fucked over quite a few soldiers and their families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. The "domino effect" was the excuse always used at the time.
If Vietnam "went red" then all of Asia would soon follow, and then Australia, and so on and so on...

It was an example of a logical fallacy called "the slippery slope," which says that if A and B happen, then C, D, and F must follow. Conservatives love it, because it inspires fear, and fear makes people irrational and easy to manipulate.

Obviously it wasn't true, and that is the real "lesson of Vietnam:" nothing is inevitable, and if someone says it is, be very suspicious.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. .
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. To stop people from realizing
that communism and democracy were not mutually exclusive. We didn't have to worry about Kerala back in '57 because that was just a state... who cared that they were ruled by democratic communists? But Vietnam? That was a whole country, so if a Communist was democratically elected there, people would know. Same reason we killed Salvador Allende: His Marxist leanings didn't stop him from ruling democratically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. The U.S. military hasn't fought "for freedom" since World War II, possibly
Korea.

All other military actions since then have been meddling in the internal affairs of other countries or barging into conflicts that regional powers could have handled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. Our "freedom" to enact colonial rule in other countries for their resources, of course.
Edited on Mon Oct-06-08 11:24 PM by McCamy Taylor
The Cold War was nothing but a big exercise in colonialism, US vs. USSR. Just think Spain vs. England circa 1600 and change the major players.

Lots of oil in them there southern Asian waters.

BTW, the whole notion of the prosperous middle class with money to spare to invest in the markets and to spend on luxury items that would drive an industrial revolution and fuel capitalism----that was only possible because Europe was busy plundering other lands for their wealth starting esp. in the 18th century. We still depend upon the two tiered world to maintain our standard of living and our economic systemic. The majority of the world lives in poverty while those in the US and Western Europe live in affluence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. War is a racket - General Smedley Butler right?
Huge money to be scammed. That my think!

That's the "other things to do" that Cheney was referring to, wasn't it? War for profit and justifying bald power grabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. To generate capital for big business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Yep. Bell helicopter and Hughes tool made brazillions.
So did the Springfield armory and Colt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-08 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
26. For no real reason....
To fight a phantom enemy. There always seems to be an enemy, even where none exist at all.

Communism posed no threat to us and the entire bases for invading and occupying Vietnam was a lie. War is unethical, barbaric and inhumane; but it is profitable to some and they are willing to sacrifice people in the name of money and greed.

Just ask General Electric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC