Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The media is now concerned about the quality of Ohio's vote?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 06:03 AM
Original message
The media is now concerned about the quality of Ohio's vote?
Edited on Thu Oct-16-08 06:05 AM by Botany
Where were these people in 2004?

When 16,000 votes were loaded into Miami County's total
after all the voting had been over for hours and the new vote %
matched the old vote % down to .01.

When 24.9% of all voters in Cleveland were purged from voter
rolls.

When Ken Blackwell sent out voter registration forms from his
office and then ruled that the completed forms were invalid
because they were on the wrong weight of paper.

When exit polls showed that Kerry had won the state by
>500,000 votes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Small correction... Blackwell only threatened to invalidate forms that were the wrong weight...
... and he got so much flack for it he never implemented it. I'm pretty sure I'm remembering this right.


I wouldn't be surprised if he found other ways to invalidate those voters though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You are right but his public statements about "paper weight" put
a "monky wrench" into the system and caused lots of problems
@ the county BOE level .... which I think was what he was trying
to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rancid Crabtree Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. after an avalanche, every snowflake pleads "not guilty"
We need to make voters personally responsible for their own actions and for those of their Reps, instead of distributing (in secret) the consequences of their poor choices across the state. The answer is simple. Accepting the question is difficult. No more secret ballots. If the prospect of voter fraud seems like small potatoes when our candidate might win, imagine how gargantuan that prospect becomes when the other shoe drops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. No more secret ballots? Are you kidding?
That's a cornerstone of the democratic process. If people know how you vote, they can fire you or beat you up for not voting how they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rancid Crabtree Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. There's small choice in rotten apples
...we have secret ballots now and look how many people have given up on the process...why?...because it's an all or nothing proposition...democracy is "consent of the governed" but true liberty requires the unanimous consent of the governed...what we have now is a dog fight and the big money wins, every time...our reps hide behind closed committee doors...when the choice is the lesser of two evils, you chose when to take your beating and you assume a campaign promise is that...we all know campaign promises have been broken, time and again...it's always the other guy's fault...there's small choice in rotten apples...with increased representation, an increased percentage of people would have an actual voice in politics...will the fringe be able to push through their agenda (and beat you up if you don't support it?)...no, but whatever portion of their agenda is reasonable to the other increased numbers of representation, something more reasonable can be coalesced with other reps for results, instead of unintended consequences in which everyone pays...or sumpin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Why do we have to make it harder for..
people to vote, and easier for our votes not to count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rancid Crabtree Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. a large percentage of people DO NOT VOTE now...
...and registering them is admirable, but what's the point if a quota system is the stimulus...how many more will be turned off from the process after the news...the question should be why don't more people actually vote and the answer in part is likely their disillusion with partisan politics...there's small choice in rotten apples...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. After the 2004 election..
where people had to stand in line for 8 hours to vote, it's amazing that registrations in those same areas are up. Perhaps we are witnessing, through voters being challenged, etc., why so many are reluctant to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Don't you get it?
When some Democrats talk about our vote not being counted, even though there is substantial and impartial documentation, it's a conspiracy theory that never reaches even the outer reaches of the mainstream media except maybe directly on election day, when they promptly forget about it for two to four years.

When the Republicans cook a story out of whole cloth from a set up of a suspicious 'raid', the media is instantly on the ball. It's what responsible journalists do.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch...

Tens of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering in ways that appear to violate federal law, according to a review of state records and Social Security data by The New York Times.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/us/politics/09voting.html?_r=3&hp=&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Botany, our own party called us conspiracy theorists back in 2004. I feel somewhat
vindicated. They even mentioned that when electronic voting machines vote flipped, we should immediate call down to the boiler room so they can take the machines down.

I believe that this year the party will fight for our votes, if I thought otherwise, I'd be working with the Greens.

This change has to do with the LEADERSHIP (as in Howard Dean and others). I am so glad progressives wrestled the power away from the corporate Dems-DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC