|
In case any of you are not familiar with him, he is ALL about voting rights:
"The AP has come out with a preposterous item claiming that the race between Obama and McCain has "tightened." This would seem to be a set-up for a "close" election after all, and one, therefore, that John McCain could "win"--as Michael Collins notes below.
Michael's point is not at all far-fetched, considering not just the Bush Republicans' amazing record of anomalous "wins" throughout this decade, but Big John's statement just today that he can guarantee a victory next week.
Well, such a victory would be.... remarkable. Here, at the bottom, is Salon's piece on the prediction by veteran analyst Charlie Cook of the National Journal. Cook foresees an "Obama Grand Slam" on Election Day.
Now, let us not forget that other sages from Inside The Beltway said the same four years ago. I recall distinctly Sidney Blumenthal's pre-E-Day think-piece laying out the reasons why George W. Bush was going to lose to Kerry. (Afterward, there never was a peep from Sid about the unexpectedness--and inexplicability--of that outcome.)
But Obama's way more popular than Kerry, and McPalin's way less popular than Bush (who wasn't very popular at all, even in the GOP), and the economy is tanking so egregiously that no-one could or would say otherwise.
Thus a startling turnabout this time will raise a lot more eyebrows, and raise them a lot higher, than in 2004.
And yet there are plenty of dim bulbs and true believers out there who will swallow anything; and not a few of them are working for the media.
So this is not a time for any rational American to be complacent."
MCM
|