Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Setting the Army Standard (for Jerry Springer)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:21 AM
Original message
Setting the Army Standard (for Jerry Springer)
http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2089

Setting the Army Standard (for Jerry Springer)
by: Brandon Friedman
Sun Oct 26, 2008 at 02:50:54 AM EDT


I'll make a long story short: A guy who ended up as a colonel got another colonel to fake a paternity test for him so that he could save his marriage and avoid making child support payments to the former Army specialist he impregnated. The Army Times has this as their cover story. Here's an excerpt:

After repeated requests from Carlson, Adkins said he agreed to take the paternity test, according to the interview.

"I ... got a ... {paternity} test for him because he thought he had impregnated another woman," Adkins told investigators.

"He said, 'You know, I just can't have my marriage destroyed.'

"He said that he's 98 percent sure , but it's better to be 100 ," Adkins said, according to the interview.

Adkins said he later realized it was a mistake, but that he felt a sense of loyalty to Carlson.

"I came from Washington, D.C., and I didn't make colonel by being disloyal to people," he said.



Read that sentence in bold again. Boot-licking, anyone? Aside from how disgraceful this episode is for the Army officer corps, I mean, what a fucking lackey, right? Apparently Mr. "I-didn't-make-colonel-by-being-disloyal" guy missed the entire fucking point of 20 year's worth of leadership training. I'm sorry, but to me, the attitude in that guy's statement is far worse than the simple act of showing up to fake a paternity test for his buddy. It's a sign that this guy has been leading soldiers the wrong way and damaging the force with his backward view on things for two decades. He honestly thought he was doing the right thing when he went to fake the test. I can only imagine how many thousands of soldiers this guy has led poorly over his career. What an embarrassment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like the Army will be less one more shitty officer.
Good for the Army and good for the soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC