Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush and the economy: Why to blame him (easy talking points for people who need them)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kevin881 Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:58 PM
Original message
Bush and the economy: Why to blame him (easy talking points for people who need them)
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 10:58 PM by kevin881
from http://officeofstrategicinfluence.com/blog2/208


---------------------

Nobody blames Bush, so allow me
October 15, 2008 – 12:01 pm

In a Washington Post opinion poll today, referencing the economy, someone said “I’m pleasantly surprised that nobody is blaming President Bush over this situation. It would be nice to see him end his term on a high note.” So I would like to pioneer this apparently uncharted land and blame Bush for our current economic situation.
Middle finger

You need to have a basic middle school education to understand this. But for those of you still waiting to graduate 8th grade, I’ll try to go slow.

When George W. Bush took office, business was booming, the power of the dollar allowed us to buy gasoline at $2 a gallon. The government had its largest surplus in history — 5 trillion dollar surplus projected. Back then, the national deficit was lowering, which strengthened the dollar every day.

A lower deficit means a stronger dollar. As an illustration, if you go out and borrow a lot of money, your credit score lowers; in the future your money isn’t worth as much. You can’t just say, “I promise I’ll pay you back,” because people see that you’re not good for your money. But if you have no debt, then your credit score is higher, and you can buy anything you want. The same thing goes for the national debt. If the country has no debt, then the dollar is extremely strong.

However, since America’s national debt is so astronomical (ie, there are less stars in our galaxy than our national debt), value of the dollar drops. This means that foreign-bought commodities costs a lot more even if their value doesn’t change. This means that if we increase our deficit, then the price of food, water, gasoline, cars, electricity goes up; everything costs more even though the value doesn’t change.

So back to Bush. When he entered office, America was blessed with having the largest budget surplus in history. Then Bush gave away the surplus in tax cuts. Every American received a check for a few hundred dollars.

Meanwhile, Bush increased spending. The armed forces had extraordinary spending increases, and huge government restructuring took place. That isn’t inherently bad, but the surplus that would have paid for it was already given away.

Because there was no longer any excess money, other programs began to suffer. Public education was one of the hardest hit. Public college tuition nearly doubled. (My tuition at a public university) went from $2000 a semester to $4000 a semester). Already, the effects of my $300 the surplus check were null.

States also ran out of federal funding, which made them turn to other means of income. Local taxes were immediately raised: Food taxes, cigarette taxes, property taxes and gasoline taxes were raised. Even luxury taxes were raised. But with Bush spending out of control, there were still huge gaps in money for state spending, like police enforcement. The result is that the police increased their ticket giving as a last-ditch effort to stay afloat. 1,2, 3, 4 (That $100 ticket and $500 insurance premium increase you got…thank your $300 surplus check for it)

With the cost of living going up dramatically, Bush did the absolute worst thing imaginable.

When the Afghanistan-based al-Qaeda attacked America on September 11th, 2001, Bush fabricated an enemy and convinced America to attack Iraq instead. This war increased deficit spending on a magnitude that America’s never conceived. Bush continually broke his own records as he spent more and more money.

Value of the dollar droppingIn 2004 he broke records with a $445 billion deficit. (By 2008, he had broken his own record with a deficit of $455 billion)

Because of this, over the past 8 years, the value of the dollar has dropped at a free fall. Just by looking at the value of the Dollar vs Euro over the past 8 years we can see how weak the U.S. currency has gotten. The Euro has doubled it’s strength against the dollar. (See chart) Even the Yen has made significant gains against the dollar.

What happens next may take at least a highschool education to grasp, so I understand if it’s too much for the Bush supporters to understand. (Note: a Bush supporter is different than a true conservative, for whom I have a lot of respect). With the value of the dollar dropping so rapidly, and government spending going up, America has entered a state of hyperinflation. (1, 2, 3).

High inflation means that worker’s pay cannot keep up with rising commodity costs. Couple that with the fact that the lower value of the dollar is already making commodities rise, a huge majority of people can no longer pay for the high cost of living. This leads to a number of things: people can no longer afford their mortgages, people can no longer afford luxuries like cars or new computers or…you name it, people can’t afford it. When people don’t buy a company’s products, that company loses income, which leads to job cuts. When people lose their jobs, the cycle repeats itself: people spend less, more companies cut more jobs, companies raise prices, and more people can no longer afford their mortgages. Millions of homes then foreclose, which leaves banks stuck with the debt. But the banks don’t have this money, because they were expecting people to pay off their mortgages. So then the banks cannot produce liquid money, which is what lead to the recent stock market crash.

This is why I blame Bush for our current economic problems.

Remember, we had a 1.1 trillion dollar projected surplus when Bush took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good lord is it too much to ask
for websites to correct their own grammar and do a simple spell check before they post something they write online? I can't stand reading an editorial or news article where there are misspellings or other just as frivolous problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. A bit more to it than that.

The various "bubbles", mostly caused by de-regulation. Especially the recent/current housing speculation bubble. Mortgage backed securities, sliced diced and sold with other investment instruments to unsuspecting investors (assured by a corrupt rating system that the investment was AAA instead of the true rating of near junk bond status). 100% mortgages, offered to people who had no business buying $400K, $500K, $800K homes. All goes back to de-regulation.

The first signs of trouble from the de-regulation boom of the eighties and, sadly, the nineties was the S&L scandal, followed by the tech bubble, then came Enron and Global Crossing and a host of other scandals brought about by greedy "pump and dump"ers. De-regulation and lack of enforcement for the regulations left on the books.

And it's all the conservative, free market, Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman/Alan Greenspan, trickle down types fault. All of them.

Greenspan recently admitted that he "discovered a flaw" in his economic theories. The "flaw" was that he thought that these Wall Street types thought more of their reputations than of the money they were making. Yup. Hard to believe but that's close to an exact quote.

I had my doubts about him before, but I always figured he was a smart guy. He sounded smart. Boy was I fooled. Dumb as a bag of hammers.

Anyway, yeah, the war and the tax cuts and the excesses of spending sure didn't help the problem any. And Bush is to blame for all of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Both items here miss the real problem to this
Greenspan keeping interest rates at a 45-year-low for almost 6 quarters, in an attempt to spur consumer spending. This led to the housing bubble because suddenly we had a 'universal homeownership' platform to the Bush regime that allowed profitable lending to anything with a pulse. This all stems back from people being allowed to borrow money for almost nothing and literally no proof of credit or income (in some cases)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. The BIG problem is that Bush did nothing to stop it.
From commodity inflation to the housing bubble bush was nothing but a cheerleader. Don't forget 9/11!

All of the problems did not just happen instantly. It was clear in 2000 there were problems with one commodity (energy). Bush never suggested that we do something about it. (Conservation?) The current drop in oil prices shows that conservations would have helped.

The housing bubble was collapsing for four years! Foreclosures prove this.

9/11? Bush had warnings. Wouldn't it have been better if the 9/11 attacks had never happened?

Don't we elect a president to do something?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC