|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 09:49 PM Original message |
PLAME & WILSON are now appealing "Leak lawsuit" case to SCOTUS ... WOOT!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanboggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. Excellent! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femmocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. Here's hoping the liberals have a majority when the case is heard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-19-08 03:13 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. That's my thought too. Maybe some of the older justices have just been waiting for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. one thing though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. is their attempt to hold wrong doers accountable a way of under cutting Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. if obama will not pursue bush, inc.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-19-08 09:59 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. More tongue in cheek than sarcasm, actually. Is there an icon for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-19-08 03:15 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Good cop, bad cop? ~nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. k and r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-18-08 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'm sure Scalia & Co. will see justice done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shellgame26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-19-08 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
11. God forbid this happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-20-08 05:22 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. He did have a kind of eery vibe to him, didn't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PRETZEL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-19-08 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
12. I had thought that it was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-19-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
13. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-19-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
14. How safe is "Scotty" McClellan going to be now ..??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-20-08 05:13 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Scott may be safer now than he was before he announced to the world that Bush is GUILTY as charged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-20-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. I bope you're right -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shellgame26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-20-08 09:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. his mom is pretty well-known in Tx |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PRETZEL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-20-08 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
17. From last year, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC