Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Many Groups Spied Upon in MD Were Nonviolent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 10:20 AM
Original message
Many Groups Spied Upon in MD Were Nonviolent
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 10:21 AM by MountainLaurel
Actually, it looks like almost all of them were. Damn, peaceniks.

Maryland State Police labeled members of a Montgomery County environmental group as terrorists and extremists days after they held a nonviolent protest at an appearance by then-Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. at a Bethesda high school.

Police files released to the activists reveal that the governor's security detail alerted the state police's Homeland Security and Intelligence Division to what troopers guarding Ehrlich described as "aggressive protesting" by the Chesapeake Climate Action Network in 2005.

A review by The Washington Post of those and other files given in recent days to many of the 53 Maryland activists who were wrongly labeled as terrorists in state and federal databases shows an intelligence operation eager to collect information on the protest plans of a broad swath of nonviolent groups from 2005 to at least early 2007.

Those groups included not only death penalty and Iraq war protesters who were spied on by undercover troopers in a 2005-06 surveillance operation exposed in July, but also those who opposed abortion, the manufacture of cluster munitions, globalization and the government's expansion of biodefense research at Fort Detrick.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/18/AR2008111803487.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm too lazy to look it up..
But I thought MD was a "blue" state?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sort of
But "Bobby Haircut" Ehrlich was a Repuke, and a politically vindictive one at that, known for firing Dems without cause.

The only reason that MD is a blue state is that the heaviest population areas, the DC and Baltimore 'burbs, are Dem. In terms of geography, most of the state is firmly in the Repuke camp. (Remember Obama's comment about "bitter" folks clinging to guns and religion? -- This is who we was talking about.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC