Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Florida tourism group endorses 30 mile offshore drilling as healthy for tourism.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 01:47 PM
Original message
Florida tourism group endorses 30 mile offshore drilling as healthy for tourism.
Edited on Sun Nov-30-08 01:51 PM by madfloridian
I have never in my life seen anything like the way everyone is falling in line and supporting and endorsing drilling up close to the coastline of Florida. It is like the memories of the hurricanes that rip up the Gulf of Mexico, that come in from the Atlantic or wander up the coast of Florida....have all been forgotten.

And now a tourism group actually comes out and endorses the offshore drilling as close as 30 miles from the coastline. I wonder if profits are coming for this state...the way everyone is supporting it now.

Florida Tourism Group Endorses Offshore Oil Drilling

A Florida tourism group has endorsed an idea that politicians and environmentalists have been trying to prevent for decades: the exploration and production of oil and natural gas in the waters off Florida's Gulf Coast. State tourism officials long have opposed drilling off Florida's shores, but the Florida Association of Convention and Visitors Bureaus now says drilling will help preserve the state's No. 1 industry.

"Changes in global energy markets have affected the price and supply of oil and natural gas and subsequently may have a future impact on Florida's tourism industry," the association said in a three-page position statement.

The association said it would support offshore drilling and production, but the operations must be at least 30 miles from the coastline. Florida's $65 billion-a-year tourism industry employs nearly 1 million people.

The association said a long-term energy policy that promotes conservation, efficiency, renewable fuels and increased oil and gas production "is essential to maintain a healthy, vital Florida tourism industry."


It was not hard to get our Democrats to pretty much fall in line as well. And the people of Florida according to most polls support the idea. Of course the media blitz on the local news didn't hurt. Some of our most respected anchors pushed the idea of drilling offshore as needed and vital to our survival.

House approves offshore drilling bill but skeptical Republicans raise objections

The fate of the legislation, which Republican members contended would produce little new domestic oil, remains uncertain. The politically sensitive issue of offshore drilling may only be resolved as part of a budget bill that Congress must approve before it adjourns at month's end.

The measure, which was approved 236-189, would allow states to authorize drilling 50 to 100 miles from their coasts. The federal government would be allowed to approve drilling 100 to 200 miles from shore.

Nevertheless, the Democratic plan failed to placate most Republicans, who argued that it would not open up areas closer to the coasts with potential to provide more oil and gas. And they want to lift bans on drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Republicans also said the proposal did not offer states incentives to approve new drilling off their coasts because it did not allow them to share the oil royalties with the federal government.

House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio said the plan "won't do a damn thing about American energy.


More about that bill...it apparently gives Florida no choice as the decision is already made.

Here is the Senate Gang of 10 idea which is now the Gang of 20. This is the plan Obama went along with.

"The measure now goes to the Senate, where a bipartisan group of 20 lawmakers has been working on a compromise that would lift a drilling ban in the eastern Gulf near Florida, and allow Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia to approve offshore drilling."

This bill will give Florida no choice...drilling will be done right up to 50 miles off shore.


More on Florida's lack of choice:

The proposal would end most of the ban on drilling. It would allow a 50-mile buffer on the East Coast, as well as Florida's Gulf Coast. Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia and South Carolina would be permitted to start oil and natural gas exploration outside the buffer.

....."The Gang of 10 proposal would encourage states to allow drilling off their shores by sharing some of the federal offshore royalty revenues with the states. But unlike the other four states, Florida would not get a choice on whether to allow drilling off its coasts. When asked why not, Chambliss said, "It's only a logical extension of what's happening in the Gulf right now. Plus, that area has been identified as an area where resources are available right now."


In the paths of hurricanes


And now it may be as close as 30 miles, as the tourism group is recommending. Only one side is sending a message, the media is willing to comply with that message....and the other side does not speak out with an opposing message. It was just that simple to get the long opposed idea of drilling close to the shoreline to be quite acceptable in the minds of the people.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is
a "NOT" joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. AND I'm sure that the profits go directly to the state to flitter away, rather
than subsidizing the Floridian's pocket.. much like Alaska does. Seriously, they really want NO reason for anyone to live here. Between pre-paying for nuclear power on electric bills, insane property tax rule that make the newest purchaser pay the most tax (mostly young and struggling or elderly and retired), to the barbaric school boards who want to NOT teach, and now this idea of drilling off the shores of popular tourist destinations. They really have lost their damn minds down here. Florida will be uninhabital in 25yrs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. How about that! A Florida tourism group
Actually realizes that a reliable and affordable source of energy might just allow tourists to continue to travel to Florida. I guess that "Walk to Sunny Florida" ad campaign just didn't work out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Florida tourism group supports oil industry.
Edited on Sun Nov-30-08 02:19 PM by madfloridian
Yes, indeedy. And the "long-term" policy can come later...or not. That is the feeling I get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. i wonder how much money it cost the oil industry to get this group on board. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yep, those oil slicks will be a REAL draw for tourists!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. how quickly FL forgets offshore drilling + oil infrastructure + hurricanes = oil spills
Edited on Sun Nov-30-08 10:07 PM by wordpix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "44 oil spills found in southeast Louisiana"
Your first article alone is more than enough to make states think twice about the paths of hurricanes.

Remember how there was not much publicity about any of it at the time?

It should be a factor to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Your posts are always so depressing!! Cheer up...
Start of something new in 8 weeks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. oil will have to be selling for 150 + a barrel to turn a profit
by the time they could bring a drop of oil to a facility on shore our use of oil will have been reduced to make this folly unprofitable. just where in Florida will they build in the infrastructure to store and distribute the oil to refiners in the southern part of the usa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Good points.
Selling out to the oil companies just as we are all getting on board with alternative means...and selling out the Florida coastlines for good. Not reversible. So many dead zones already in the Gulf, add a few oil spills from the 8 to 10 hurricanes that might occur in a season.. real problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. And y'all question FL having it's own Fark tag?
Edited on Tue Dec-02-08 12:24 AM by liberaltrucker
No disrespect meant. Just sayin'

www.fark.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC