Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feinstein Explains Her Reticence About Panetta Nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:43 PM
Original message
Feinstein Explains Her Reticence About Panetta Nomination
Hmmm. Will she or won't she fight the confirmation? Unclear...

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/feinstein_on_panetta.php

Feinstein Explains Her Reticence About Panetta Nomination
By Elana Schor - January 6, 2009, 1:09PM


Just talked with Dianne Feinstein outside the Senate chamber about her qualms with the Leon Panetta nomination. The incoming Senate intelligence committee chairman said that both President-elect Obama and Vice President-elect Biden called her after the fact to discuss the surprise choice of Panetta, who has no direct intelligence agency experience and whose nomination came as unwelcome news to Feinstein when it broke yesterday.

"I understand their thinking" in choosing Panetta, Feinstein explained, describing herself as "very respectful of the president's authority ... this is the man {Obama has chosen}."

I asked Feinstein whether her reticence about Panetta's lack of ties to the CIA would be mitigated by having Steven Kappes, her preferred choice for CIA director, stay on as the agency's No 2. "I believe very strongly" that Kappes should stay, Feinstein said, adding that Panetta's standing would be "very much enhanced" were Kappes to stay his deputy.

Feinstein seemed to acknowledge the Obama team's desire to find a CIA director who would signal an end to the abusive interrogation tactics of the Bush years. "We all want a break with the past," she told the reporters milling around her in the Senate. "I was the one who went into the conference committee" between the House and the Senate last year with an amendment that would use the Army Field Manual as the universal standard for detainee interrogations, she added.

"I understand the administration's desire to cut clean and open a new chapter and I support that. Whether those changes can be made" with Panetta at the helm, she added, remains to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. C.Y.A.
First impressions are always the most accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. if DiFi opposes him, I'm automatically inclined to support him...
...at least until I learn more about him. DiFi is a DINO's DINO. A war profiteer and a war criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. She's a crook- along with her husband...
They should both be in prison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh my. Evan Bayh was just on MSNBC with Mrs. Greenspan
saying the exact same thing about Kappes. I guess the DINOs are going to be pushing hard for him to stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Bayh at least agrees Panetta would be good; difi, not so much. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. True, he seems more open minded. But I found his
focus on Kappes to be odd - that was before I saw these statements from DiFi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Reluctance. Not Reticence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC