Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush didn't pardon ANYONE?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 11:35 PM
Original message
Bush didn't pardon ANYONE?
Edited on Tue Jan-20-09 11:36 PM by Marr
I had fully expected Bush to issue a lot of pardons for his inner circle in his last hours-- particularly for the DoJ firings case. I expected him to push the envelope with preemptive pardons, in fact. However, the only reports I've read on this subject cite only Bush's commutation of those two Border Patrol agents who shot a fleeing suspect. Is this the case? If so, I'm amazed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Their closing argument is that they did nothing illegal.
So this is why there were no pardons.

They are betting, and I would say pretty safely, that they do not have a legitimate fear of prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think you're correct. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe George Wacked Bush figured they'd keep their mouths shut if their necks were on the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't Bush leave him a note?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdale Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bad news for Ted Stevens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't know
Given what I've been reading about the behavior of the prosecutors in the Stevens case, there just might be reasonable grounds for a new trial.

What the hell - he's out of the Senate. I could live with just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertyfirst Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. If anyone had been pardoned they would have been able to testify against him
or others without being able to claim the right against self-incrimination. As it is, they can utilize their right against self-incrimination to refuse to testify about things in which they may have been involved.

Another poster on another thread suggested this as a possible reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. loyalty is a one way street with the bu$h* monkey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StercusAccidit Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Border Patrol Agents didn't get pardoned
They got their sentences commuted, meaning they still have those pesky felony convictions on their record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC