|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
laststeamtrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:22 AM Original message |
Craig Crawford: Impeach John Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. first recommendation here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laststeamtrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Some people don't 'get' CC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:58 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. of course i know what you mean. and i think scalia should resign for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 10:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
42. My sources tell me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:57 PM Response to Reply #42 |
108. Scalia SHOULD be impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Riverman (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:21 PM Response to Reply #108 |
127. Any Pretext to Get this Corporate Puppet off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:46 PM Response to Reply #127 |
133. I'm telling you, this is a fight worth fighting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 02:33 AM Response to Reply #11 |
168. IT WAS NOT A MISTAKE, IT WAS INTENDED TO CAUSE AN INTENTIONAL ERROR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatchWhatISay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
172. And don't forget Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sohndrsmith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 01:16 AM Response to Reply #6 |
164. Actually, yes. : ) Very well said. Thanks for the laugh.... : ) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:26 AM Response to Original message |
2. Seriously 35 words, and the dimwit can't memorize it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. how about a cheat sheet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Suji to Seoul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
18. He's too busy getting his orders from Rove to bother with book learning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asksam (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 12:49 PM Response to Reply #18 |
61. Not once we get 2/3 of the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam kane (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:09 PM Response to Reply #61 |
155. Now there's what I like to hear. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpartanDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:30 AM Response to Original message |
3. thank god |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:55 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. sure it is. hey, scotus? he should be impeached when he jay walks! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:11 AM Response to Reply #3 |
25. Not the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:17 AM Response to Reply #25 |
48. Simple? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:59 PM Response to Reply #48 |
92. How long has he been Chief? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 03:15 AM Response to Reply #92 |
169. My theory: He practiced the words, but did not practice pausing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:14 AM Response to Reply #169 |
174. Great way of putting it (lost the beat) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stlsaxman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:39 PM Response to Reply #48 |
131. He should have had the oath on paper in his hands- this is unforgivable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:15 PM Response to Reply #48 |
145. speaking prepared lines in front of a live audience of 2 million; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanctified (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:34 AM Response to Original message |
4. Obama does not need to take the Oath again, Craig should try reading the Constitution before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Ding ding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:30 AM Response to Reply #19 |
27. And the nice little smile on the president's face as he waited nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dothemath (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
126. smiles all around .......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:04 AM Response to Reply #19 |
45. Roberts was choking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INDIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #45 |
75. Roberts wasn't on the SC until 2005. But I'm sure you knew that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. I didn't imply otherwise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanctified (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:14 PM Response to Reply #77 |
88. I don't remember Roberts doing anything in 2000 wasn't he in private practice? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unapatriciated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:59 PM Response to Reply #88 |
125. he might be referring to this.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INDIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:08 PM Response to Reply #77 |
115. He was managing partner at a major law firm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:28 PM Response to Reply #115 |
120. You asked for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INDIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:00 PM Response to Reply #120 |
151. Damn. I apologize for my snark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clear Blue Sky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:34 PM Response to Reply #45 |
129. Roberts worked for some law firm in 2000. Don't think he had much to do with the recount. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:54 AM Response to Reply #4 |
20. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
28. You might want to read it yourself. The office transmits at noon. But before Obama can do anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:47 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. To think Roberts went through his confirmation hearing without using any notes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanctified (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:54 AM Response to Reply #28 |
54. Article II Section 1 of the Constitution states only the President has to say the Oath. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #54 |
81. Yes but the interpretation of the 20th infers the oath is somewhat optional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanctified (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:15 PM Response to Reply #81 |
89. The oath is required but it is only required to be said by the President. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:22 PM Response to Reply #89 |
118. I agree with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uberllama42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:45 PM Response to Reply #89 |
132. Nina Totenberg of NPR says that several presidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 03:43 AM Response to Reply #28 |
170. The actual language of Article I, Section 1[8] is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
86. +1. The stupidity is staggering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
104. Obama took the oath in front of 2 million onsite witnesses - that's good enough for me- I was there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
147. Article II Section 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanctified (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:47 PM Response to Reply #147 |
149. You are correct and from Article II Section 1 only Obama needs to say that not Roberts. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sohndrsmith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 01:27 AM Response to Reply #149 |
165. And Obama didn't say it verbatim, apparently, which is the reason for the re-do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:40 AM Response to Original message |
5. oh jeesus lighten up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laststeamtrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:47 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I admire your handle. But I was wondering... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Do you think that because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laststeamtrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. "...standard lines"... "lie, exaggerate and (be) full of shit when attacking Obama..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:10 AM Response to Reply #14 |
24. He got his avatar at "hot topic". nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 12:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
60. read my response below. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 03:17 PM Response to Reply #60 |
84. ""I believe in the Free Market. I believe in Capitalism. I believe in Free Trade." - B. Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Pretty lame response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. Che and Obama are very similar (if you ignore the fact that their views are diametrically opposed) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 10:33 AM Response to Reply #14 |
40. "Everyday's historic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 12:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
58. Yeah, cause Che never encouraged people to serve others, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 12:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
64. Here's the exchange I wrote about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:55 PM Response to Reply #64 |
123. question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:09 PM Response to Reply #123 |
137. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:28 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #138 |
177. It could be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:44 AM Response to Original message |
7. Roberts is a buffoon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:40 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Apparently he tried to do it from memory and screwed it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:15 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I think standing in front of millions of people scared the shit out of him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. As I recall, Obama voted against his appointment to the SCOTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:03 AM Response to Reply #15 |
44. With his bald spot recorded for all of history.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
70. I DID notice that! :D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 12:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
59. Well, there's that. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:15 AM Response to Reply #7 |
47. so, i wasn't the only one who thought it might have been on purpose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oak2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:28 AM Response to Reply #47 |
51. I beg to differ on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 09:24 AM Response to Reply #51 |
176. i didn't mean to offend, but i think it is safe to say.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:52 AM Response to Original message |
9. In the spirit of reconciliation, I think we should just offer to send the five SCOTUS conservatives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:29 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. How About 2 or 3 Years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
22. "Unforgivable error"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
23. It was a huge event and he flubbed up, but I don't think it's that big of a deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
26. Roberts is a good judge. He was an ideological choice, to be sure, but who wouldn't have been? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugabear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:48 AM Response to Reply #26 |
36. You really think Roberts is a good judge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 03:09 PM Response to Reply #36 |
83. Yes I do. A Supreme Court Justices' job is to argue for his own ideological position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bette Noir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:44 PM Response to Reply #83 |
122. The job of a Supreme Court justice is to interpret the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #122 |
179. If you don't think that SCOTUS Justices decide cases based on ideology... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saboburns (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
29. Am I missing a sarcasm tag?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
31. Teh stupid is still burning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iwillnevergiveup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
32. It was reported later on MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 01:00 PM Response to Reply #32 |
66. I was watching the video of the luncheon on C-SPAN last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
33. Heckuva Job Johnny... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newtothegame (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
34. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olegramps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
35. I am totally opposed to Supreme Court Justices being appointed for life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
37. My wife flubbed a line of our marriage vows at the altar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 10:25 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Of course not. You were never married in the first place, according to these geniuses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #37 |
57. I would consult Freud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
38. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
41. This is the kind of crap I hope Obama can put an end to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
43. I am absolutely certain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
46. and yet he has no problem with Bush... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
49. Train is leaving the station |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
50. Drama queen much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stumblnrose (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 12:43 AM Response to Reply #53 |
163. Hey I thought Roberts was the drama queen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nytemare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:56 PM Response to Reply #50 |
150. Now, I do think Bush should have been impeached for not saying "nuclear" correctly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
52. This pretty much sums it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
55. He should be fired anyway becuase Bush was not our legally elcted pres when he appointed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
56. One Of The Most Stupid Things I've Ever Seen In All The YEars Of DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asksam (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 12:53 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. I dont think he should be impeached because he screwed up the oath. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laststeamtrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 01:11 PM Response to Reply #56 |
67. That tears it. I believe you know stupid when you see it. Avoid mirrors. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 01:19 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Why, You Standin Behind Me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:45 PM Response to Reply #68 |
90. So, you agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. Calling For Impeachment Due To The Innocent Stumbing Of Yesterday Is One Of The Damn Dumbest Things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:10 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. Actually you are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:34 PM Response to Reply #96 |
101. Actually, No Part Of What I Said Was Wrong. You Look Really Silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:41 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. You do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:52 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. Guarantee You: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:58 PM Response to Reply #106 |
109. Heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:13 PM Response to Reply #109 |
116. ROFLMAO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:21 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. Thanks for keeping this kicked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:25 PM Response to Reply #117 |
119. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:47 PM Response to Reply #109 |
161. Are you seriously suggesting that because he doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grace0418 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 01:58 AM Response to Reply #103 |
167. Even if it wasn't innocent, it doesn't warrant impeachment. I'd like to see the guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:02 PM Response to Reply #96 |
111. Even if it was intentional...it does NOT matter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
63. I wish that Roberts would be removed from office, but Obama is the legal president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alittlelark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
65. Justice Roberts has had at least 2 'seizures' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toymachines (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
69. He's a dumbass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
71. I like Craig Crawford. I always enjoy him on Countdown... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dukkha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
72. If we can impeach for Grammar, * would have been gone in 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuckinthebush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
73. What the...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
74. There might be reasons to impeach John Roberts, but this isn't one of them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
76. he should be impeached for helping Shrub steal Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
78. ensure legality? He was President yesterday noon Eastern time regardless of whether he'd taken the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
79. Of all the ignorant, silly, ludicrous and jackass junior highish shit to show up, this is tops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 04:48 PM Response to Reply #79 |
91. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:05 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. Deleted message |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:08 PM Response to Reply #91 |
95. And I'm sure that never, in the entirety of your lifetime, have you made a mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. One |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. Ah, then, no wonder you can position yourself on such a fucking assholish high horse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. Easy sport |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:39 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. I'd love to see him gone. But not for some ludicrously childish reason of fucking up a few words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:55 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. If you think impeaching someone for a simple mistake that we all make, you're the foamer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:03 PM Response to Reply #107 |
112. Back to the foam, eh? Crazy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:07 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Deleted message |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:40 PM Response to Reply #112 |
140. The charge against Clinton was perjury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fireweed247 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
80. As I recall he has no qualifications for the position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiranon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. He was highly qualified just did not care for his political views and lack of compassion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
99. What Roberts did shows partisan attitude, which has no place on the Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
110. By those standards, no one should hold office when they bungle lines... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
113. Agreed. We should fire anyone that EVER appears nervous. Off with his Head!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blaze Diem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
121. Rec #56 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
childslibrarian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
124. If he's like me in front of an adult crowd... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AthiestLeader (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
128. It gave right talk shows something to talk about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
130. Troll extraordinaire? Yeah, that's the focus we want!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
134. I SO second this! He should be ashamed of himself!!! There is NO excuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
135. what a fucking joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NAO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
136. Activist Judge on Supreme Court Re-Writes Constitution (Roberts) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Piewhacket (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
139. First Impeach Scalia. Then Thomas. Then Roberts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rep the dems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
141. Mark me down as 1 person to NOT recommend this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DallasNE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
142. That's Too Extreme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
143. Roberts readministered oath a while ago at the White House in front of reporters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobd0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
144. Whether Roberts re-administered the oath or not he blew it when it counted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
146. Obama had to retake the oath of office due to this mashing by Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortyfeetunder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
148. Not enough a big fish to fry, pardon the pun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
152. First order of business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
153. Roberts is an asshat, but it's not an impeachable offense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam kane (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
154. Tired of pretending this is "incompetence" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
156. What? Did he get a blow job? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
157. Beyond Stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
158. This is my 2 cents when it comes to Chief Justices of the Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harry Monroe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:47 PM Response to Reply #158 |
160. Actually, I don't think ANY President should have any say as to who the Chief Justice will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-21-09 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
159. Too bad the POTUS can't appoint another Associate as the CJ.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Infinite Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
162. John Roberts, while I disagree with him most of the time, is an honest and brilliant justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 01:39 AM Response to Original message |
166. could we please prioritize? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BanTheGOP (596 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 03:47 AM Response to Original message |
171. Have No Fear, People... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconicgnom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:31 AM Response to Original message |
173. How did this BS get on the front page? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
175. This is silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
178. I think you're missing the point of it all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
180. That's just ridiculous. It's like the word "impeach" now sets off a Pavlovian "K&R" reaction here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC