So let us assume that Obama does a bunch of presidential acts without redoing the oath of office. Even someone sues him saying none of his acts are valid because of the first flubbed attempt, who is going to determine that? Would the Supreme Court would try to invalidate all of Obama's acts? They would make their own Chief Justice look like an idiot if they ruled against Obama or let a lower court ruling against Obama stand.
it's in the constitution that he becomes president at noon, oath or no oath, so I wouldn't think someone could say none of his acts were valid based on a flubbed oath.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.