Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gillibrand is right-wing because her district is right-wing.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:48 AM
Original message
Gillibrand is right-wing because her district is right-wing.
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 10:54 AM by BurtWorm
She will be forced to move leftward if she wants to represent all of New York and get reelected. She also owes David Paterson big time.

I choose to remain hopeful for the time being. I like the way the world is moving these days. It's doing fine all by itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. who's Gilliland?
it's GILLIBRAND
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. The dude on the island?
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hey, little buddy.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you. But I don't need Paterson sucking up to conservatives.
I'm disgusted with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. I voted for her 2X...
Given the choices we've had in NY20:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I would have voted for her too,
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. We had that drunken load Sweeney for 8 years, and Gerald Soloman before that...
Kirsten's not been a shining example of progressivism, but she's been okay most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Has to be better than that asshole Sweeney.
A drunken toad would be better than Sweeney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. She is not "Right Wing"...
What she ALSO is not is "Left Wing"...she's a centrist Democrat, as are many Democrats outside of NYC.

While New York is liberal by national standards, NYC is liberal by New York standards. Carolyn Maloney and Jerry Nadler will never have a problem getting re-elected, but that doesn't mean they're competitive in a state-wide race (remember, this is the same state that elected Al D'Amato and George Pataki for 18 years).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Well said,
I do think she's going to have to stay close to the center-left to get reelected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. A Clinton-Lieberman Democrat? Dems need that neocon wing of the party to SHRINK, not grow.
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 11:59 AM by blm
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Hyphenating unrelated words do not make them any less nonsensical.
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 11:38 AM by Occam Bandage
Gillibrand is strongly anti-war and pro-civil-liberties. The one and only blemish on her record on that front is her vote for the compromise FISA bill, which isn't really much next to her 100% rating from the ACLU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Clinton and Lieberman are unrelated politically? All 3 stayed in full support of Bush's decisions
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 12:05 PM by blm
on terrorism and Iraq war until Lieberman lost his primary race, only then did both Clintons start backpedaling on their own support when HRC needed to move leftward for her presidential primary race.

But from 2001-2007, Clintons and Lieberman were on the same page - the same page with Bush.

BTW - I don't mind giving Gillibrand a chance at all....I just don't want a Clinton clone in office at a time when the left is finally making some progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm a Clinton Democrat as well...
as are many other New Yorkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. You agreed with HRC's siding with Bush's war agenda from 2001-2007? You sided with Bush's decision
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 11:53 AM by blm
on terrorism and his Iraq war strategy the way Bill did from 2001-2007? Or weren't NYers thinking about any of that as they idolized the 'Clintons' and kept a blind eye to their closeness with the neocon agenda of BushInc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. No _ I also disagree with President Obama's oppostion to Gay Marriage...
fortunately, I don't make voting decisions on a single issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. Gillibrand is not right-wing at all. The only issues
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 11:03 AM by Occam Bandage
she might reasonably called "right-wing" on are the 2nd amendment and immigration, and I support 2nd-amendment rights since the Heller case (and yes, Howard Dean had an A rating from the NRA, too). Take a look through her issues ratings; she's a "centrist Dem" the same way McCain was a "centrist Republican"--a few sops to the other side mixed in with a party-line record.

http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=65147
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Good point
the Heller case pretty much set the law for many years to come on firearms. In upstate NY (as well as many, many other parts of the US) hunting is just a normal part of the way of life. Even if you don't personally hunt, if you live in one of these areas, you almost always know someone who does.

I remember my lady's union sending out mailings to all of the membership exhorting them to vote for Obama with the plea "He won't take your guns." If that's true, and Heller is the established law on the subject, then what's the problem with Gillibrand's votes on Second Amendment issues? The only way that Heller is going to be done away with is a Constitutional Amendment, and in this case, that's even more impossible than the fundies trying to get an anti-equal marriage amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. We don't need another Blue Dog but I will reserve judgement
on her until I watch her as a Senator as opposed to being a member of Congress. Any Democrat that wins a conservative district owes the Democrats that voted them in as well. The idea that Republicans have been pragmatic the last 8 years and thus we must compromise with their ideology at every turn instead of expressing a vision that represents something different is a false one, especially since more people were voting on a theme of change. People sometimes respect someone that stands up for their own position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. You got it. She is the..
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 11:33 AM by TreasonousBastard
REPRESENTATIVE of her district, not the dictator, and she's lucky she nailed Sweeney when she did.

Do not be surprised when we see the spectacle of her hanging out with Paterson helping out upstate when he runs for re-election. And do not be surprised when she digs into the Clinton moneybags for both their campaigns. I missed her campaign, not living anywhere near there, but I hear she's a real pit bull out on the stump, something our Governor will certainly appreciate when she's by his side.

In fact, do not be surprised if her connection to the Clinton cash machine makes her one of the most important Democrats in the state-- just like Hillary herself held far more power than any junior Senator would be expected to hold.

(Personally, I'm thinking she'll be a more effective Senator for New York than Schumer is or Hillary was.)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. What about her is so terrible?
She voted AGAINST the $700 billion boondoggle, and is for second amendment rights. Voting for the entire constitution and for not allowing the rich to dip into the pockets of the poor and middle class with, as was entirely predictable, no oversight, isn't wacko right-wing. This isn't Michelle Bachmann we're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC