Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now there is a botulism related recall.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:25 PM
Original message
Now there is a botulism related recall.
On top of the salmonella one.

OR IMMEDIATE RELEASE -- January 23, 2009 -- As a precautionary measure, Stonewall Kitchen of York, Maine is voluntarily recalling seven dessert sauces because they have the potential to be contaminated with Clostridium botulinum, a bacterium which can cause life-threatening illness or death. Consumers are warned not to use the product even if it does not look or smell spoiled.

Link for products:

http://www.fda.gov/oc/po/firmrecalls/stonewall01_09.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Honestly - we have to eliminate these bacterium
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. We aren't praying hard enough. : ( n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Old-fashioned sanitation and sterile techniques is how it's done, but Bush put us back 100 years...
... to the days before there were federal inspectors and federal standards. Upton Sinclair wrote "The Jungle" about conditions in the US meatpacking industry in 1906, leading directly to the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act by Congress.

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I remember that book!
I had to read it in HS and it was so gross!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Bushco never read it at all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. What if terrorists wanted to contaminate our food supply?
It would be an entry-level assignment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Has Obama named an FDA chief yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No, but scientists have been telling him it needs reform.
The anti-science, anti-ethics Bush years weren't good.

Steven Nissen Gives Obama an Rx for FDA Reform

Barack Obama most definitely doesn’t have time to read the journal Nature right now. But maybe can spare a minute for a quick read of the Health Blog? We’ll save him some time with the high points from some letters by prominent researchers about what he should do on a bunch of scientific and medical issues.

The one that really caught our eye comes from Steven Nissen, a Cleveland Clinic cardiologist who’s in favor of significant reform of the FDA.

Nissen, himself a potential candidate for FDA commish and often viewed as an enemy of Big Pharma, sounds off in favor of a fixed six-year term for the FDA chief to make the agency less susceptible to political pressures.

He also wants reconsideration of the system in which the drug industry funds a lot of the FDA’s budget through user fees: a system criticized by some for giving the industry too much sway over the agency.

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/01/20/steven-nissen-gives-obama-an-rx-for-fda-reform/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Good. I'm still waiting for word on who will head FDA and FEMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. EPA is Lisa Jackson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Wikiiality out of date on confirmations.
Senate confirms N.J.'s Lisa Jackson to EPA post
by The Associated Press
Friday January 23, 2009, 9:57 AM

Admiral Dennis Blair confirmation hearing was...today? Friday? for DNC...I watched most
of it on C-span.

Wiliality comment about Rahm Emanuel well taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. So far, I'm the only one who's updated that page.
Wikiality is an open tube and anyone is welcome to fix my mistakes!

(I will add your info about EPA)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Oh sweetie..you do not want me editing anything.
I can create invisible typos all day long.
Wouldn't even post here if spell checker and preview did not exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Oh, but I do!
But, only if your balls (or Thatchers) so desire.

The wiki is basically an interactive, hyperlinked database with pictures, and the Truthiness Encyclopedia is a wiki with jokes.

There's lots of things you can do--I've saved some very good links about privatization on that page.

Oh, and all wikis have spell check and preview.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Their stuff is terrific.........
Pricey, but really good, and they're just a small outfit.

Damn. This is terrible. This is the kind of thing that can put a small, less successful, business out of commission permanently.

Fortunately, I found some copycat recipes for some of their products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. No botulism was found - temps and pH did not meet the company's quality control
so as a precaution they initiated a recall - hats off to integrity in a company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Their integrity is going to cause panic among their loyal customers.
They should have found a better way to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. If they didn't catch it until it was shipped out - it was either recall it or keep quiet and hope
Edited on Sat Jan-24-09 05:56 PM by dmordue
I'm more likely to buy from them now actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thinking about it a little deeper, I now realize their only choice...
was to let the FDA do it for them. My concern is that the FDA doesn't have a very good reputation right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC