Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"White House Backs AG As Support Wanes"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:44 AM
Original message
"White House Backs AG As Support Wanes"
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 10:48 AM by GreenPartyVoter
WASHINGTON (AP) - The White House stood by Alberto Gonzales on Monday, even as support for the embattled attorney general erodes on Capitol Hill amid new questions about his honesty.

Three key Republican senators sharply questioned his truthfulness over the firings last fall of eight federal prosecutors. Two more Democrats on Sunday joined the list of lawmakers calling for Gonzales' ouster.

Several Republicans also urged President Bush to allow sworn testimony from his top aides about their role in dismissing the U.S. attorneys - a standoff threatening to result in Capitol Hill subpoenas of White House officials.

"We are not negotiating," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said. "We are where we are, which is where we were last week. ... I can understand why people would think we have not made the right decision, but we think we have.'"

http://apnews1.iwon.com/article/20070326/D8O3TOM01.html

See Also:

"Justice E-Mails on Lam Show Frustrations"

WASHINGTON (AP) - In the year before her dismissal as San Diego's U.S. attorney, Carol Lam's Justice Department bosses griped about her in snide e-mails and strategized about putting her "on a very short leash."

Yet they gave no explanation when they finally kicked her out in December, Lam testified last month.

The e-mails, among more than 3,000 pages of documents released this week by the House Judiciary Committee, suggest officials grew frustrated by a prosecutor who had her own priorities and views.

In one exchange last July, a Justice Department official wrote that he was sad a top agency official was leaving. That official, Bill Mercer, wrote back suggesting other reasons for sadness.

http://apnews1.iwon.com/article/20070324/D8O27KM00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. AG
"You are doing a great job Gonzalesy"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Now that is a nice picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Boy *'s petulance is as constant as the North Star.
Good. Impeachment is just around the corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That would sure be nice, woiuldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is the strategy used by the WH to
cover their asses. Blame the AG thinking the public is too dumb to understand what they are doing. Now, either Gonzales knows what they are doing and will benefit financially for life or he is just plain dumb. Either way he is a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. *makes a big L sign on her forehead for L-berto*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. The White House does, does it?
The White House is standing by Gonzales now? Not Bush but the White House?

The AP lackies are ordered to use the term the White House when Bushco is trying to distance themselves from the statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Good point, I hadn't thought of that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC