Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something's going down...something big.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:16 PM
Original message
Something's going down...something big.
A discerning ear can distinguish the sotto voce whispers which are occasinally reported in the MSM, constantly on the Web: those which speak of scandal, of investigations, and of impeachment. But there's something else afoot I believe: the silence from the usual right-wing pundits and their hired help in the Congress speaks volumes - the great psychologist Harry Stack Sullivan once wrote that you can tell more from what people do NOT say than from what they DO say. For all the talk of hearings, investigations, possible impeachments, and these discussions often emanate from Republicans themselves, you do not hear the blasting hue and cry of the chronically abusive, defamatory right wing. The usual goofball suspects, the Rush-Hannity-O'Reilly crowd is losing their collective breaths and appear winded.

It's not what we are hearing now which is going to be the 'straw' which will break the back of this administration, it is the story which the insiders are afraid, but know now will inevitably, come out. What this is going to be is anyone's guess at this point. No scenario is too unbelievable, including 9/11, spy networks - both foreign and domestic, lying about wars, even extraterrestrials for the true Tinfoilers - we will find out, and soon.

I recall this occurring right as the Watergate Scandal was nearing its zenith, and then Ford pardoned Nixon and the balloon burst, deflating our hopes of finding out what was really going on all those years. This time, they may not be so fortunate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
60. May not be good. May be
something about the economy. Anyone with 47 minutes to spare could do worse than watch this on Google video:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279&q=Money+as+Debt

"Money as Debt", a short animated documentary on the current monetary/banking system. Presented in a cool, factual manner, so it doesn't raise your blood pressure too much until you think of the implications after the movie's over. For those who've seen Aaron Russo's "Freedom to Fascism", this covers the same area, but from a more theoretical and impersonal POV.

I am pretty certain also that this, not the various physical evidence, should be the starting point for any 9-11 expose; too bad it's not as catchy as "hunt the Boeing". But it's certainly more rational and way, way scarier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. More than anything else the blogosphere will help to find out some of what is going on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. IMO this is bigger than big...
the 'Truth is already out there'...it's already on the blogosphere.

The question is...will it be verified somehow. Rest assurred, the theories have already been profferred. Dome here on DU, others elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. There is enough truth out there that it's going to get a lot better or a lot worse
I think we're at a tipping point. The corruption in the WH is getting a little hard to ignore. Even the base is getting restless, with the GOP party of crime showing a 15% drop in affiliation. There is no way that they will be able to claim that the 2008 election is soooo close and then steal it. They're moving on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. precisely. It worked with Gonzo, it will work on other hot issues, too
the bloggersphere is also scaring the crap out of MSM, who can't dictate what constitutes news. A few of them still decry netroots, et al, but as their boredcasts get more nicole oriented, and as more people search out information and news on alternative sites (because the pap that poses as news is indigestable) their cries show some desperation.

Politico is an example of trying to reinvent ones self and to become relevant again, but pity they are too in love with Bushista policies. TribCo's failure to sell, even after is asschopping at the LATimes, is a very serious sign.

MBAism has a lot to do with what is wrong in the news, but as you say, our solution is the blogosphere (not to be confused with the soon to be indicted gov. of Illinois)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. lol.. The silence on the right side of the Hill is just because all
the culpable GOPers have begun to lawyer up. There are so many who went away out on that rotten limb and are poking around with their toes for some solid footing to find their way back to the ground..

(And some of them, like Wiley Coyote, have forgotten rule #1 of cartoon physics.. i.e. DON'T LOOK DOWN!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Lol! Poor Wiley, he always looked. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
39. Don't Frickin' Blame It On Me! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #39
66. You think you've got probs? You wouldn't believe what they try and blame on me! :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Martial law is coming? I don't think the MIHOP 9-11 details will ever see
the light of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. But they're also losing the martial support.
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 01:56 PM by damntexdem
Can they trust a military that is increasingly upset at Dubya to impose martial law? If they do and it does, can they be sure it will do their bidding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. I can't believe they've been doing his bidding this long! Oh, well, the
real Bush military—the contractors—will do anything for money, even for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Follow the money" Deep Throat on 'All The Presidents Men"
It's the same now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Deep Throat was the vehicle
for the deposing of Nixon...today's kids would call it the 'cheat' on a video game. When stymied, they, meaning the insiders, got the Post and our boy Woodward, back on track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
41. The internet is the new DEEP (VERY DEEP) THROAT.
There are some MIGHTY investigators on the internet (I can think of at least 6 DUers who are absolutely top of the line), and they are doing the work that the media formerly did, but still gets paid for ( :puke: ) . Internet sleuths are able to research and find out where the skeletons are buried, and how the money gets traced. Look at Carlyle, Plame, 9/11, Elections Fraud... ALL of these investigations have traced the crimes back, not only to the money, but to the people behind the people committing crimes, and all of the people behind the criminals, of course, keep popping up over & over again.

This time, we've not only got DEEP THROAT, but we can get the messages out that the Washington Post PROBABLY kept off the front pages during Watergate. In other words, the internet is EDITOR-FREE, and if one blogger is inclined to shelter a buddy who might be close to an investigation, another blogger will out that "buddy" sooner or later anyway.

That's why, this time, we need to take down the criminals once and for all, and not let any presidential "pardons" take away our ability to nail the crooks.

Please, DUers, PLEASE e-mail your congresscritters, and ask for a new bill to prevent presidential pardons from being valid for a president's own staff or cabinet, or any people whose crimes (like Abramoff) lead back to the office or staff of the president or congressmen (DeLay). Crimes against our government should NOT qualify for a pardon.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
57. yes and
it was the NYT especially which downplayed Watergate for a very long time. they paid the price in the short run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. With all due respect.....
The RW nutjobs haven't been silent...they've been attacking as usual....the inside-the-beltway-talking-heads are still spewing RW bullshit at an alarming rate.....

Every few months a well-intentioned DUer will come up with a post to the effect of "I've got this feeling that something is about to happen". I've been there too (hell, I think I actually posted that once..).....It's a collective sense of anticipation coupled with a healthy dose of "wishful thinking".

I'm not criticising....in many regards I hope you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I understand and respect your post
but this time the attacks are shallow and falling on deaf ears. It's quantitatively and qualitatively different, IMO.

Thanks for the thought and the polite criticism...I'm appreciative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
38. Thanks....and
I would LOVE TO SEE a completer Conservative Meltdown!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. According to those early reports, Jeff Gannon visited the White House
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 12:48 PM by Old Crusoe
over 200 times.

I'd be interested to know just whose office he dropped in on for those visits.

http://rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/slaughter_conyers_gannon_response_425.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Speaking of Jeff Gannon.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I bet AOL keeps that page up
It's all about the traffic, baby!

Good old Jimmy D. Guckert. A whole lot of nothing that turned out to be something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
50. This is why they went after Clinton for Sex...
they know and understand this stuff with respect to blackmail and exposure. They didn't count on the fact that Americans don't much care what other people do in their bedrooms or Oval Ofices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
52. AOL?
I'd think it would be Mark Foley keeping the...oh, never mind, that's just inappropriate. :P :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. The Freedom of Information Act won that info on his visits. My question
is why he was visiting on days when there was no press conference?

If he's a journalist, why does he have unfettered access to the White House when others in the press corps do not?

And if his role there is NOT as a journalist, which offices was he dropping in on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonnieJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. My guess
Karl Rove
Scott McClellan (sp?)
Ken Melman
George Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Have no idea myself, but in the BEST of scenarios it appears that he
was given a higher role as a journalist than the rest of the press corps.

And the White House has never offered a good explanation of how come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Karl Rove, hence the name "Turd Blossom"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hell my Republican mother just stays silent every time I bring up what's going down.
She used to fight back. Now she just says nothing and I think it is because she is frustrated and probably mad at her own party.

When my mother shuts up something is very wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Impeachment is off the table. War with Iran is on the table. Pelosi has spoken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soulcore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Exactly, meet the new boss, same as the old boss. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Excuse me but the American Government and the RNC being one and the same
is not a big enough scandel for you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. RW pundits have shifted to the attack mode
which is what they are best at. They have always had a hard time defending gov't and those Republicans in charge. Now that the dems have congress any little thing wrong about the gov't will be blamed on them.

An example would be when one of the top officials at homeland security was found to have been involved in child porn - but most folks didn't even hear about this. If this had happened under a dem administration then they would have made sure everyone knew about it. That is their real power - setting the agenda by keeping certain things off the discussion table and focusing on distraction issues about their 'enemies'.

The real discussion is why Bush Co officials are not all in jail by now. They are criminals and should be charged as such for a myriad of crimes they have committed such as outing a cia operative, starting an illegal war, etc. Once the dems in congress get through with the investigations the real truth may come out.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'd put money on this:
When the last layer of wrapping paper is taken off the last present, and "some assembly required" is complete, we'll be looking at 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
43. Interesting that Kucinich announced today (or very recently) that he wants to begin
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 03:33 PM by kath
looking into the discrepancies in the 9/11 commission's report...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
67. Bushco better have steel that won't melt from jet fuel. Heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Ected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. The Scandal Is There, But the American People Have Lost Interest
I don't disagree that there's a feeling in the air of impending Republican implosion, but at the same time, I don't think America feels connected enough to ETHICS IN GOVERNMENT to give momentum to any Democratic response. The 29%-ers will continue to hang onto to an illusion, and the rest of our citizens will either be vigilant, a la DU, or apathetic, a la the majority.

I wish it wasn't the case, but if it's not sexual, not National Enquirer fodder, it's not going to interest the American public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. You drastically underestimate your fellow countrymen.
I am getting the feeling from other boards I visit that Americans now feel more connected to the notion of ethics in government than they have since Watergate. Don't sell them short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Ected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. I Certainly Hope You're Right
But until proven otherwise, I will look back on 2004 and remember how the blogosphere had all but decimated Bush-Cheney.

And we all know how that ended up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. It ain't just the blogosphere any more.
You got yourselves some Democratic Congresscritters with gavels. I don't think Waxman, Leahy or Conyers will let a bit of apathy stand between them and Doing the Right Thing.
I know I haven't had so much fun since the pigs ate my sister :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Ected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. I Have Friends All Over the Globe I'd Celebrate With
If the Bush cabal was brought to its knees.

World Party!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. Uh---Isn't Sullivan a psychiatrist, not a psychologist?
Big diff ya know?

Herbert "Harry" Stack Sullivan (February 21, 1892, Norwich, New York – January 14, 1949, Paris, France) was an American psychiatrist whose work in psychoanalysis was based on direct and verifiable observation (versus the more abstract conceptions of the unconscious mind favored by Sigmund Freud and his disciples).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Stack_Sullivan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Apologies extended...
Long day in the trenches here drilling and filling.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. "I have not seen a president so isolated from his own party. . ." -- Bob Novak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. It feels like Watergate.
I am a senior and when Watergate was coming down, I was an adult ~~ out of college and teaching HS at the time. I remember it well as to what it felt like. There was a certain feeling in the air when the tide turned very decidedly against Nixon. You could literally taste it, feel it and smell it.

That feeling is coming back on me now. Why? One of the main reasons is my friends who until now were basically politcally disinterested. All of a sudden, this has caught fire with some and others are beginning to ask questions. They all know politics has always been a passion with me, but I 99% of the time avoided any discussion with most of my pals due to their lack of interest. Now? They are asking and there is interest. One is watching the Sen and House hearings and discussing details of the pending issues on things like the US Atty firings. Things like this NEVER happened in the past.

It has begun to catch fire. I can only hope that it brings BushCo crashing down like a house of cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
45. We're probably about the same age. I feel as you do and I hope
you are right! Sometimes I think that impeachment is the only way to save our country. We've got to get rid of this administration!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. I understand what you're saying.
On the other hand, we've had posts of this sort since the very early days of the * administration, and they have always proven untrue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
32. I want two stolen elections completely exposed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
35. I've never went for tinfoil
but, you're right there is something that's going to come out, something that was never meant to see the light of day. The silence is very telling, the swagger is going out, last week when the chimp* had his angry stage show, I saw fear in his face, not anger. The deer in the headlights look is going to become clearer and clearer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
42. Yes, there is the sense of a big shift occuring.
we are certainly living in interesting times, it's true. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
46. I hate to nitpick you, but just wanted to be sure I follow you...
By "sotto", did you meant to say "subtle?" If I simply misunderstood your meaning, then my apologies.

Aside from that, yeah, I sure hope your spidey sense is correct. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. A stage whisper...as it were.
Note that on Wolfie this afternoon, they're doing a whole piece on Impeachment. Then, of course they look for ecuses why he's not impeachable - what they call a 'reality check' so don't worry, he's here to stay. We'll see.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
48. Heard on NPR: Susan Ralston is missing.
oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Things just get curiouser and curiouser....
soon...Hoo nose?

The rate of change is increasing rapidly. Can't keep up with all the news...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. sleeping w/ the fishes, no doubt.
Bada BING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
53. I listened to Rush for about an hour
No mention of these HUGH developments

Talked about Al Gore, then denied Global Warming some more, then straight into a "feminazi" rant.

Did he not talk at all about the USA scandal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. HE DARE NOT SPEAK OF THESE THINGS!
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 05:12 PM by PCIntern
They are ready to explode in their faces and he's busy ducking and feinting. As much as that fat slob can do that now.

on eidt: how can you listen to him ofr that long? Here we have that moran Smerconish---I'm good for about 8 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #54
61. I've been listening to him for years
I have to get myself into a Zen state when he starts spouting obvious bullshit, but I find it very telling what the RW is "thinking" on any particular issue.

Of course, he's doing nothing but regurgitating RNC talking points, but sometimes it's interesting to hear the rationalizations of these atrocities being committed.

It's almost like being in a Shrub cabinet meeting. Although even Rush doesn't say "nukUlar"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. The thread over at freeperville
was full of people very upset that Rush picked today of all days to put out a fluff show.

He blathered on and on about himself from what the freepers said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. See...
things are coalescing and there's BIG TROUBLE all over Rethug-land. Stay tuned!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #55
62. REALLLLY? That's interesting.
VERY interesting.

Seems like ol' MahaRushie has been told to clam up.

Delicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
58. What?
This makes no sense to me:

I recall this occurring right as the Watergate Scandal was nearing its zenith, and then Ford pardoned Nixon and the balloon burst, deflating our hopes of finding out what was really going on all those years. This time, they may not be so fortunate.

Maybe we just have different ideas of what the "zenith" was. For me, it was Nixon's resignation.

Maybe my memory just doesn't serve me very well here. Are you saying there were efforts afoot to prosecute him and others beyond his resignation, and the pardon ended that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. yes of course....
lots was coming out at the end. There would have been more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. Ford "pardoning" Nixon.
You're right. NOTHING eclipsed that summer day in 1974.

The resignation was on Aug. 8th. 1974.

The "pardon" (even though no pending lawsuits or investigations were active) was on Sept. 8th, 1974.

One whole month.

The American people, by and large, were convinced that the whole affair had been wrapped up neatly.

The "pardon" was a political afterthought.

Damage control. as I call it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Our long national nightmare is over....
....move along nothing to see here....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. LOL
I don't know if you're being satiric, jubilant or ambivalent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC