Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E&P: 'How Did Newspapers Get in This Pickle?'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 07:55 PM
Original message
E&P: 'How Did Newspapers Get in This Pickle?'
Then came an era of cheap credit, and chains began to think that if they got big enough the "synergies" would drive down costs and drive up revenue. Chains began to make multiple billion dollar deals. And not just Tribune, which bought Times Mirror, the publisher of the Los Angeles, or Gannett, which was expanding. Even once modest chains began to make blockbuster deals. McClatchy bought all of Knight Ridder getting trophy papers like the Miami Herald. Lee Enterprises, in sleepy Davenport, Iowa, took over Pulitzer, the most famous name in newspapers.

With debt. Lots of debt.


http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/newspaperbeat_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003952561



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very interesting article.
Thanks for posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. To me, it was the lies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Agreed. I'm ashamed I ever held the NYT or WaPo in high esteem.
The Enquirer has more credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sadly, the Washington Post is stil in business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. They stopped publishing for their communities
And published solely for the benefit of their big advertisers. There's more to it than that, but that's one of the big reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC